Consumers can’t read, understand or use information in companies’ privacy policies. So they end up less informed and less protected than they’d like to be. New research shows a better way.
If you’re handling big datasets, it’s important to think about user privacy.
Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock
Every government, business or organisation releasing data needs to think about how to ensure that the risk of re-identifying an individual or revealing personal information about someone is low.
Many more faces to be added to a national database, but will it make us any safer?
Shutterstock copy/Andrey_Popov
Australia now has more states and territories with specific revenge porn laws than those without. But they may not be the most effective way to tackle the problem.
The contentious book documenting Nelson Mandela’s last days that was pulled of the shelves left many unanswered questions. Judgement must be suspended until it’s content is made public.
I’ve told you before, the Lawrence v Texas decision says it’s fine.
Africa Studio
To properly address the social harm of online privacy invasions, such as in the “CanadaCreep case,” Canada must devote federal attention to strengthening its minimal and unclear privacy laws.
Can artificial intelligence help us stop drowning in paperwork?
Jiw Ingka/shutterstock.com
Family violence will not always be ‘obvious’ to CCTV. Therefore measures must be put in place to ensure that footage cannot be used against victims should circumstances of violence be challenged.
Then government’s new law enabling the collection of metadata raises serious privacy concerns.
shutterstock
BCI devices that read minds and act on intentions can change lives for the better. But they could also be put to nefarious use in the not-too-distant future. Now’s the time to think about risks.
What happens if your smart kettle is hacked?
Shutterstock
When smartphone apps get permission to access your location or other activity, they often share that data with other companies that can compile digital profiles on users.