UK United Kingdom

Are pigeons as smart as primates? You can count on it

We humans have long been interested in defining the abilities that set us apart from other species. Along with capabilities such as language, the ability to recognise and manipulate numbers (“numerical…

The humble pigeon mightn’t look smart, but it’s no bird-brain. Seamoor

We humans have long been interested in defining the abilities that set us apart from other species. Along with capabilities such as language, the ability to recognise and manipulate numbers (“numerical competence”) has long been seen as a hallmark of human cognition.

In reality, a number of animal species are numerically competent and according to new research from psychologists at the University of Otago in New Zealand, the humble pigeon could be one such species.

Damian Scarf, Harlene Hayne and Michael Colombo found that pigeons possess far greater numerical abilities than was previously thought, actually putting them on par with primates.

More on pigeons in a moment, but first: why would non-human animals even need to be numerically competent? Would they encounter numerical problems in day-to-day life?

In fact, there are many reports indicating that number is an important factor in the way many species behave.

Brown cowbirds are nest parasites – they lay their eggs in the nests of “host” species; species that are then landed with the job of raising a young cowbird.


Cowbirds are sensitive to the number of eggs in the host nest, preferring to lay in nests with three host eggs rather than one. This presumably ensures the host parent is close to the end of laying a complete clutch and will begin incubating shortly after the parasite egg has been added.

Crows identify individuals by the number of caw sounds in their vocalisations, while lionesses appear to evaluate the risk of approaching intruder lions based on how many individuals they hear roaring.

But numerical competence is about more than an ability to count. In fact, it’s three distinct abilities:

  • the “cardinal” aspect: the ability to evaluate quantity (eg. counting the number of eggs already in a nest)
  • the “ordinal” aspect: the ability to put an arbitrary collection of items in their correct order or rank (eg. ordering a list of animals based on the number of legs they have, or ordering the letters of the alphabet)
  • the “symbolic” aspect: the ability to symbolically represent a given numerical quantity (eg. the number “3” or the word “three” are symbols that represent the quantity 3).

We know that humans are capable of all three aspects of numerical competence, but what about other animals?

For a start, we already know that the cowbird, lion and crow possess the cardinal aspect of numerical competency – they are all able to count. Pigeons possess the cardinal aspect too (as was reported as early as 1941) as do several other vertebrate and invertebrate species.


And in 1998, Elizabeth Brannon and Herbert Terrace showed that rhesus monkeys have the ability to order arrays of objects according to the number of items contained within these arrays. After learning to order sets of one, two and three items, the monkeys were able to order any three sets containing from one to nine items.

This discovery represented a clear progression in complexity, since ranking according to numerical quantity is an abstract ability – the ordinal aspect.

The new research by Scarf, Hayne and Colombo – which was published in Science in late December – has pushed, even further, our understanding of numerical abilities in the animal kingdom.

So what did they do?

Well, first they trained pigeons to peck three “stimulus arrays” – collections of objects on a touch screen. These arrays contained one, two or three objects and to receive a reward, the pigeon had to peck the arrays in order – the array with one object first, the array with two objects second, the array with three objects third.

Once this basic requirement was learned, the pigeons were presented with different object sets – one set containing arrays with one to three objects, and sets containing up to nine objects.

Having been presented with these novel object sets, the pigeons were once again required to peck the sets in ascending order. Pigeons solved the task successfully, even though they had never been trained with arrays containing more than three items.

A pigeon taking part in the University of Otago experiment. William van der Vliet

In fact, they performed on par with rhesus monkeys, demonstrating that both pigeons and monkeys are able to identify and order the numbers from one to nine. This is significant because it shows these complex numerical abilities are not confined to the primates (and that pigeons are smarter than many people think!)

So if non-human animals possess the cardinal and ordinal aspects of numerical competency, that means it’s the symbolic representation of numbers that makes humans unique, right?

As it turns out, no.

It’s been shown that red wood ants (Formica polyctena) can not only count up to several tens (20, 30 etc.), but can also communicate this numerical information to their brethren.

It would seem, therefore, that not even the symbolic representation of numerical information is specific to humans.

Of course, we still have much more to discover and understand within this fascinating field of research. In the meantime, you might want to think twice before dismissing pigeons as “stupid birds”.

Sign in to Favourite

Join the conversation

3 Comments sorted by

  1. Shirley Birney


    Clever pigeons? Indeed. And of course the term "bird brain" is an insult to birds and reveals the ignorance of humans.

    Now I'm reminded of my young son's pigeons which he had in the 80s.

    Mr Choc and Mrs Whitey were lovers. Alas Mrs Whitey took ill and so we took her from the back yard loft and placed her in a box in the enclosed back verandah, hoping she would recover in the warmth.

    A few hours later we witnessed Mr Choc waddling towards the back verandah where we had left the door ajar. He jumped up the steps, entered, waddled over to the box, hopped in and covered Mrs Whitey with his feathers and there he remained.

    After a day or two, Mrs Whitey died and we had to return Mr Choc to the back yard loft. There were tears all around but none so prolific as grieving Mr Choc's, I imagine.

    Vale Mrs Whitey.

  2. John Harland

    bicycle technician

    If ants do not have fingers and toes to count on, they presumably don't count at base 10.

    Do we know anything of how they encode number to communicate its?

    1. David Guez

      Lecturer, School of Psychology at University of Newcastle

      In reply to John Harland

      What appears to be happening is that the ants transmit numerical information in the following way:

      To transmit the information “one”, the ant ‘says’ “one”; to transmit the information “two” the ant ‘says’ “one-one”, and “one-one-one-one-one” for five, and so on. Therefore the time taken to transmit the information is linearly correlated with the quantity transmitted. Some human cultures use the very same way of counting and verbally transmitting numerical information.

      Also, if the ants need…

      Read more