The Occupy movement in the US has brought into sharp focus the level of income inequality that exists in society.
For example, in 2009 the top 10% of households in the US had an income that was about 11.5 times as high as the income of the bottom 10% of households (the so-called 90/10 ratio). In many ways it is surprising to an outside observer that there is not even more popular anger about how income is distributed there.
Income inequality in Australia is not anywhere near as high as it is in the US. However, it does appear to be rising. According to the ABS) the 90/10 ratio of disposable household income was 4.21 in 2009/10 compared to 3.78 in 1994/1995.
The release of initial data from the 2011 census allows us to pick apart this income distribution by where a person lives as well as their individual, family and household characteristics.
According to the ABS, median personal income in 2011 was $577 and median household income was $1,234.
After adjusting for inflation, median personal income was 7.5% higher than it was in 2006, whereas median household income was 4.3% higher. Unlike much of Europe and North America, income in Australia has increased over the past half-decade.
As documented in the following figure though, this increase has not been consistent across states.
Quite clearly, the fastest rate of growth in median household income has occurred in the Northern Territory and Western Australia and it is tempting to think that the commodities boom is driving most of the increase in household income.
We will have to wait till labour force data on the census is released later in the year to check how income has grown across different occupations and industries. However, with an increase in income of 10.3%, the ACT isn’t that far behind these resource-rich states. Looking out our windows at the ANU, there aren’t too many mining trucks rumbling along Northbourne Avenue.
Looking at individual characteristics, we can see that there has been a faster increase in mean income for women (8.66% between 2006 and 2011) than men (4.48%). Although men on average still have a higher average income than women, there has been a slight decrease in the gap between the sexes over the past 5 years.
The second set of bars gives the ratio of the median income in the richest part of the city to the median income in the poorest part. Here, we can see that although Sydney has quite a high income on average, this is not evenly spread by geography.
Median income in North Sydney ($2,111) was more than twice as high as median income on the Central Coast ($1,003). There were disparities in other cities (for example between Inner Perth and Mandurah) but they weren’t nearly as large.
Income data from censuses and other surveys suggest that while Australians have on average experienced significant income growth since the 2006 census, concerns about income inequality are still valid.
Overall income inequality is rising in Australia, with this phenomenon reflecting differences both between regions, and within major cities. These numbers can’t tell us how the man on the street feels the effects of this inequality, but they do suggest that the situation in Australia is not yet as dramatic as that in the US.