Boost growth, or counter a weaker dollar - which way should the RBA go?

Over the next twelve months, the Shadow Board members attach a 40% probability that the cash rate will need to increase, slightly more than the probability that the cash rate needs to fall. AAP

Whither the Aussie dollar? Since the RBA dropped the cash rate to 2.75% last month the Australian dollar has fallen to below 96 US cents, a depreciation of more than 7% against the US dollar.

With weaker data coming from China, India and Europe and mixed data coming from the US, the rapid fall in the Aussie dollar highlights the downside risks to the Australian economy, as perceived by the markets. Will the dollar slide further in anticipation of mounting downside risks, or will the current level suffice to boost Australian exports and breathe new life into the Australian economy?

The tug-of-war between the need to lower the cash rate due to sustained weakness in the Australian economy and the need to raise the cash rate in response to the expansionary stimulus emanating from the historically low cash rate and the weakened Aussie dollar, is clearly on the minds of the Shadow Board members. The strong consensus of the nine members is that the Reserve Bank of Australia should leave interest rates unchanged from May at 2.75%.

The probability that rates should rise in the next six months equals approximately 1/3, somewhat less than the risk that rates should be lower.

Over the next twelve months, the Shadow Board members attach a 40% probability that the cash rate will need to increase, slightly more than the probability that the cash rate will need to decrease. Overall, compared to previous months, there has been a small shift in favour of lower interest rates at the six-month and 12-month horizon, reflecting concerns about muted consumption, weaker global demand, falling commodity prices and tighter fiscal policy following a likely change of government later this year.

The Shadow Board is a project by the Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, based at the ANU, which asks industry and academic economists what interest rate the Reserve Bank of Australia should set.

The project is designed to test and improve transparency of central bank deliberations by revealing the opinions of individual members, emphasising the underlying macroeconomic uncertainties.


Paul Bloxham, Chief Economist (Australia and New Zealand), HSBC Bank Australia Ltd:

The significant depreciation of the Australian dollar over the past month should be both supportive of growth and shifts the balance of inflation risk to the upside. The looser financial conditions implied by the lower currency means that a further cash rate cut should be unnecessary at this stage. I recommend the cash rate is left unchanged at 2.75% this month.


Mark Crosby, Associate Professor, Melbourne Business School:

Recent weakness in the Australian dollar would suggest a pause in rate cuts. International data signals are mixed and market reactions complicating policymaking. Weakness in US GDP interpreted as reducing the likelihood of an earlier end to quantitative easing (QE) and thus strengthening asset markets being a case in point. One would suggest that in some QE countries asset price bubbles are becoming a serious issue - though the Fed has of course ignored these dangers in the past.


Mardi Dungey, Professor, University of Tasmania, CFAP University of Cambridge, CAMA:

No comment.


Saul Eslake, Chief Economist, Bank of America Merrill Lynch Australia:

The decline in the exchange rate since the last Board meeting reduces the pressure on the RBA to implement a second successive rate cut, while the data flow over the past month hasn’t presented any compelling rationale for a further rate cut.

The currency may not fall a lot further, while the economy is likely to remain sluggish and the incoming government will probably seek to tighten fiscal policy more than is currently planned.


Bob Gregory, Professor Emeritus, RSE, ANU, Professorial Fellow, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Adjunct Professor, School of Economics & Finance, Queensland University of Technology:

No comment.


Warwick McKibbin, Chair in Public Policy in the ANU Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis (CAMA) in the Crawford School of Public Policy at the Australian National University:

No comment.


James Morley, Professor, University of New South Wales, CAMA:

With inflation at 2.5% and expected to remain within the target range of 2-3%, the real cost of borrowing is far below its neutral level. This risks propping up a housing market bubble, a collapse in which will become more difficult to address with monetary policy alone the longer it persists. Policy should focus on aggregate conditions and adjust back towards a more neutral stance over the medium term.


Jeffrey Sheen, Professor and Head of Department of Economics, Macquarie University, Editor, The Economic Record, CAMA:

The recent weakening in private sector investment (across all sectors) in Australia is not matched yet by demand increases elsewhere in the economy including the government sector. The trade-weighted exchange rate has depreciated 8% since mid- April, and alongside the positive outlook in Japan plus the gradually recovering global economy, Australian net exports should eventually improve. However there is a fair risk that the likely change in the Australian government will lead to even tighter fiscal policy. Thus I consider the current accommodative stance appropriate, and expect minor tightening to be required in six to 12 months, depending on the election outcome.


Mark Thirlwell, Director, International Economy Program, Lowy Institute for International Policy:

No comment.

The Conversation is a non-profit + your donation is tax deductible. Help knowledge-based, ethical journalism today.