Cannabis harms young brains, study finds

More effort should be directed towards preventing the uptake of cannabis by young people argue US researchers, after a study of more than 1,000 New Zealanders found it could cause memory loss and drops in IQ scores by mid-adulthood. The study, which followed the participants until age 38, found those…

C3ksvxy5-1346050668
Despite calls for it to be legalised, a new study has found taking up cannabis in adolescence when the brain is undergoing critical development can cause long-term harm. AAP

More effort should be directed towards preventing the uptake of cannabis by young people argue US researchers, after a study of more than 1,000 New Zealanders found it could cause memory loss and drops in IQ scores by mid-adulthood.

The study, which followed the participants until age 38, found those that started using cannabis in adolescence and continued to use it experienced a greater IQ decline compared with adult-onset users.

In their paper, published in PNAS, Madeline Meir and colleagues write that quitting or reducing cannabis use did not fully restore neuropsychological functioning among that same group, suggesting that taking up cannabis in adolescence when the brain is undergoing critical development, could have neurotoxic effects.

“Adolescence is a particularly critical period of brain development and maturation,” said Nadia Solowij, Associate Professor and ARC Future Fellow in the School of Psychology at University of Wollongong.

“As such, it may be more vulnerable to insult from drugs than the more mature adult brain.”

While evidence has been accumulating for impaired function in both adult and adolescent samples, Professor Solowij said evidence for ongoing impairment after cessation of use has been mixed.

“This study was able to rule out a range of potential confounds that are often suggested to underlie reports of adverse effects on cognitive function in cannabis users.”

The study’s findings add to the case for preventive public health education to reduce adolescent initiation and use of cannabis, said Professor Wayne Hall, NHMRC Australia fellow deputy director at The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research.

Professor Hall said in the past it has been difficult to decide whether cannabis was the cause of cognitive impairment, or cognitively impaired young people were more likely to become involved in regular cannabis use.

“This prospective study greatly strengthens the case for regular cannabis use being a cause of cognitive decline by mid adulthood in young people.”

Robin Murray, Professor of Psychiatric Research, at, Kings College in London, said we have known for some time that heavy use of cannabis increases risk of schizophrenia-like psychoses.

“There are far fewer studies on its effect on minor psychiatric illness or on everyday life. However, there are a lot of clinical and educational anecdotal reports that cannabis users tend to be less successful in their educational achievement, marriages and occupations…This study provides one explanation as to why this might be the case.”

Sign in to Favourite

Want to follow The Conversation?

Sign up to our free newsletter to get the day's top stories in your inbox each morning, with a special wrap on Saturday.

Spinner
Help evidence based journalism become the norm and donate

Join the conversation

15 Comments sorted by

    1. Charis Palmer

      News Editor at The Conversation

      In reply to Matthew Albrecht

      Oops, that was an oversight. The link has now been added.

      report
  1. Brett Twentythree

    Typer

    "Young people"?
    Did you not think it worth mentioning that the study was on 13 year olds?

    report
  2. Peter Reynolds

    logged in via Facebook

    The vital and important point about this study is that it sheds light, yet again, on the appallingly irresponsible policy of prohibition. Our government is failing entirely to provide any protection to our children against cannabis dealers. All the evidence is that where cannabis is legally available to adults through a properly regulated system, use by children falls and age at first use increases. Any psychoactive substance can be harmful to the developing brain. The equivalent results with alcohol would be much more damaging. Professor Terrie Moffitt, from the Institute of Psychiatry, said: “It’s such a special study that I’m fairly confident that cannabis is safe for over-18 brains, but risky for under-18 brains.” Cannabis is safe for adults.

    CLEAR published independent, expert research last year which shows that a tax and regulate policy on cannabis would produce a net gain to the UK economy of up to £9.3 billion per annum.

    report
  3. Daniel Kinsman

    logged in via Twitter

    For those interested, regular use is defined in the study as using cannabis 4 or more days per week.

    report
  4. Robert Tony Brklje

    retired

    A quick read of the report finds it pretty poor for two reasons.
    Firstly no investigation of alcohol use during that same period by those same persons, for the obvious reason that alcohol has well known deleterious affects.
    Secondly, profession and hobbies, use it or lose it, has been well proven with regard to maintaining mental acuity as one ages.
    So it seems very much like a distorted report, specifically designed to achieve a preferred result by making absolutely no effort to remove two well documented causes of mental deterioration over time.
    Very poor science indeed.

    report
    1. Danny Hoardern

      Analyst Programmer

      In reply to Robert Tony Brklje

      What gets me is the portion of the tax we pay that fails to stop adults from consuming pot (at most they will stop one source, you can always get it from someone else, and usually the case is your regular supplier can get it from somewhere else).

      It doesn't matter what studies are put out, adults will still consume pot, just as the earth will spin. We would have more success at eradicating obnoxious weeds or cane toads.

      Separate studies for alcohol exist with similar results, but in a way it is good for them to focus on cannabis - it draws political attention because our government (hopefully) knows that regulation and enforcing regulation is a smarter approach to keeping pot away from adolescents.

      Some reading material: http://healthland.time.com/2011/07/19/study-marijuana-not-linked-with-long-term-cognitive-impairment

      report
  5. Danny Hoardern

    Analyst Programmer

    I completely trust the black market will check the IDs of younger people and not sell to them if they're under age. If we regulate cannabis all we do is take away money from those that profit from selling weeds. Do we really want to take money from these people? Of course not. I guarantee you that an unregulated drug is safer than a regulated drug.

    Oh wait what was I smoking...

    Once we regulate we can have current law enforcement efforts focus on enforcing age restrictions instead of wastefully spending our tax money trying to stop adults from consuming pot.

    report
  6. Sue Ieraci

    Public hospital clinician

    Rather than an ideologically-driven "this drug is worse than that one" argument, why don't we try an "all hazards" approach:

    The use of ALL mind-altering substances that affect behavaviour, brain development and judgement in the immature brain should be minimised until brain development has a chance to mature (early twenties, they say).

    How about this:

    Children and teens: minimal or no alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, sedatives, petrol sniffing, ecstasy, caffeinated drinks (?)

    Adults: take responsiblity for own actions, work towards laws reflecting potential harm.

    report
    1. Danny Hoardern

      Analyst Programmer

      In reply to Sue Ieraci

      Adults making their own decisions about what they put in their body? Sounds good!

      report
    2. Sue Ieraci

      Public hospital clinician

      In reply to Danny Hoardern

      Selective reading, Danny.

      "Taking responsiblity for own actions" and working towards altering laws is not quite the same as "do whatever you like"....

      report
    3. Danny Hoardern

      Analyst Programmer

      In reply to Sue Ieraci

      Indeed Sue, thank-you for pointing this out. Harm reduction should be our number one priority, closely followed by smart fiscal policy - we need to be able to afford the important things like better health-care.

      Scrapping an ineffective and expensive prohibition can only help (not so much reducing spending; re-allocating police resource resources to more important matters).

      I know of the horrors you guys go through with the prevalence of alcohol. After we have legalised cannabis and have…

      Read more
    4. Sue Ieraci

      Public hospital clinician

      In reply to Danny Hoardern

      Thanks, Danny - I'm with you on harm reduction and "penalty in proportion to harm".

      report
  7. Roger Crook

    Retired agribusiness manager & farmer

    Don't suppose the world has changed much in the last six or seven years?
    Table 7. Top Cash Crops in the United States (Average Value 2003 – 2005)


    Average
    Rank

    Crop

    Production


    Value ($1000s)
    1

    Marijuana

    $35,803,591
    2

    Corn

    $23,299,601
    3

    Soybeans

    $17,312,200
    4

    Hay

    $12,236,638
    5

    Vegetables

    $11,080,733
    6

    Wheat

    $7,450,907
    7

    Cotton

    $5,314,870
    8

    Grapes

    $2,876,547
    9

    Apples

    $1,787,532
    10

    Rice

    $1,706,665
    11

    Oranges

    $1,583,009
    12

    Tobacco

    $1,466,633
    13

    Sugarbeets

    $1,158,078
    14

    Sugarcane

    $942,176
    15

    Sorghum

    $840,923
    16

    Cottonseed

    $821,655
    17

    Peanuts

    $819,617
    18

    Barley

    $653,095
    19

    Peaches

    $474,745
    20

    Beans

    $467,236

    How do you 'control' an industry is big as big as that?

    report
    1. Danny Hoardern

      Analyst Programmer

      In reply to Roger Crook

      You can't Roger, the Mars mission is just a hoax, as with everything we've been spoonfed relating to humans being able to accomplish anything. Humans inventing of the TV? Fake, aliens did it. Humans inventing breakfast cereal? Fake, aliens did it. Humans inventing the lightbulb? Obviously fake, aliens did it. That device you're using to interface with the Internet? Yup.

      report