“273% Increase in Autism and We Don’t Know Why!” Thursday, April 15, 1999, Los Angeles Times.
The rising prevalence of autism is a story destined to achieve headlines, take up column inches and even bump MasterChef from the top of the water-cooler gossip list. The headline above, which appeared in the influential Los Angeles Times, is perhaps the one that started off the frenzy of intrigue.
So, is there a rise in the number of children with autism? And if so, what is causing it?
The first question is by far the easier. Yes, there has most certainly been a steady rise in the incidence (number of new diagnoses per year) and prevalence (total number of affected individuals in the total population) of autism during the past half-a-century.
The finding is well-replicated and has been observed in every country (including Australia) that has an appropriate data source to tap.
The first survey was conducted in the 1960s and produced a prevalence estimate of one individual with autism in every 2,500 people or 0.04% of the population. When I first started my research in this area in the early 2000s, the oft-quoted figure was one in every 250 people (0.4% of the population).
In the last decade, studies have seemed to continually outdo each other with higher and higher prevalence figures, ranging from the 2005 Australian figure of one in every 160 people (0.62% of the population), to a recent South Korean study, which found an astonishingly high rate of one in every 38 people (2.6%).
Of course, the true prevalence is likely to be somewhere in the middle. Currently, the most widely recognised estimate is around one individual with autism in every 100 people (1% of population).
A 25-fold increase in any diagnosis in the space of 50 years is, to put it mildly, rather worrying. But how alarmed should we be? The answer to this is related to the second question posed above: what is causing the increase in autism?
Many researchers started to explore whether there was something about the modern environment that may be causing the increase in the number of children with autism. This fire was stoked by British medical researcher Andrew Wakefield in his now infamous 1998 press conference, in which he linked the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine to the onset of autism.
Despite the heaving amount of evidence against the MMR-autism link, and the retraction of the paper on which his tenuous assumptions were based, the drop in MMR vaccination rates triggered by this scandal remains a major cause of preventable disease worldwide.
What, then, are the possible causes for the increase in autism? The reasons are likely to be many and varied, and this is what we have come up with thus far:
Conceptual change
One of the most important discoveries in autism research over the past two decades has been that the syndrome varies along a spectrum of severity. Some 20 years ago, autism was called Infantile Autism and only diagnosed when a child demonstrated “gross deficits in language development” and “a pervasive lack of responsiveness to other people”, prior to 30 months of age.
But we now recognise that children can present with less severe autistic symptoms, which are often difficult to identify at such a young age. This understanding led to the formulation of new diagnostic categories – Asperger’s Syndrome and Pervasive Developmental Disorder – Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS), both of which come under the collective banner of Autism Spectrum Disorders.
The change from Infantile Autism to Autism Spectrum Disorders has meant a greater number of children with a more diverse range of autistic symptoms are being included in prevalence counts.
But, intriguingly, studies have found the rate of the more severe form of autism (“Infantile” or “Classic” autism) has also risen over the past two decades, which suggests the broadening of the diagnostic boundaries cannot account for the entire increase in prevalence.
Diagnostic substitution
The expansion of diagnostic boundaries has meant individuals who would previously have been placed under a different “diagnostic banner” are now more likely to receive a primary diagnosis of autism. This is particularly true for the diagnoses of language disorders and intellectual disability, and the prevalence of these conditions has decreased over the past two decades as autism diagnoses have increased.
Methodological differences
As knowledge about autism has advanced, so have the techniques used to measure the prevalence of the condition. Early prevalence studies examined populations considered small by epidemiological standards (e.g. health districts), and used relatively crude diagnostic tools.
The modern method of screening whole populations (e.g. states or countries) using improved diagnostic assessments is likely to be more sensitive in identifying affected individuals.
Socio-cultural influences
Certain societal influences make it more likely for an individual to be diagnosed with autism today than in the past. These include:
- increased awareness and understanding of autism among parents and health professionals
- the formation of specific autism diagnostic teams
- a lessening in the stigma associated with a diagnosis (particularly, the dispelling of the myth that autism is caused by “cold parents”)
- the availability of governmental assistance specific to children with an autism diagnosis.
These potential explanations assume there has been no difference in the “true” rate of autism over the past 50 years; rather, what has changed is the way that we conceptualise and measure the condition.
But one should always be cautious about adopting a position based on null findings. It’s quite possible the true prevalence of autism is increasing, and we just haven’t yet identified the cause.
One potential candidate is the increase in the survival of extremely premature infants. While recent findings suggest these infants are at increased risk of autism, research in this area is at too early a stage to make conclusive statements.
What we can conclude from research to date is that there is no single environmental factor we know of that has substantially contributed to the increase in autism diagnoses.
Research into Autism Spectrum Disorders is at an exciting stage, where we can examine how genes and the environment combine to cause this condition.
If the next 20 years of research is half as fruitful as the previous 20, it’s a good bet that we will get to the bottom of the supposed “autism epidemic”.
David Howard
Home Duties
Most evidence suggests there is a genetic predisposition that increases the likelyhood of being diagnosed. This characteristic is unlikely to have changed over time. Some environmental factors will have changed over time with changes in industry and demographics. If there were greater prevalence in environments that are more common than 50 years ago, it stands to reason that there will be greater prevelance overall. For example, if flat dwellers are more likely to be diagnosed then with more flats…
Read moreLucy
logged in via Twitter
"A characteristic that can be spread through a local environment but is dispersed over distance" could perhaps be noise? It's much noisier now than it was in the past.
Dale Bloom
Analyst
Autism affects about 4 times more boys than girls. Environmental factors that increase autism would have to affect genes that are more common in males than in females (such as certain genes in chromosome 17).
Bob Buckley
ASD advocate
The rising prevalence of autism/ASD made it into the prestigious science journal Nature very recently (see http://www.nature.com/news/the-prevalence-puzzle-autism-counts-1.9280). The article concludes "Shifting diagnoses and heightened awareness explain only part of the apparent rise in autism. Scientists are struggling to explain the rest". This is code for "no matter how hard experts try, they cannot discount the possibility that there may be a real and substantial increase in ASD prevalence…
Read moreCynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
This whole debate is silly. Autism didn't exist before the pertussis vaccine in the 1940s. It was rare until the MMR in the 1980s suddenly made the numbers jump. They spiked again with the addition of the hep-B at birth in 1991. And again with the Prevnar. My baby was given the hep-B vaccine at birth in the hospital even though I had told her pediatrician I didn't want her to get it, as I had read it often caused autism. He forgot to tell the staff. She reacted with four days and nights of constant…
Read moreGrendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
Wow - there is so much wrong with that comment it is hard to know where to begin, but I shall try anyway.
"Autism didn't exist before the pertussis vaccine in the 1940s"
Hans Asperger and Leo Kanner did initial work in describing autism in the 1930s - well before the development of the pertussis vaccine, so no relationship there. In addition, this was work describing an already known set of psychological commonalities - and not just in children but in adults.
Once they had a word "autism" and…
Read moreHelen Duyster
logged in via Facebook
Actually, I was talking about this with an occupational therapists and child psychologist at my son's Early Childhood Intervention center.
The numbers of children who developed ASD, Aspergers, ADD and ADHD started to increase when the protocol of trying to save an unborn child went from 28 weeks gestation to 24 weeks gestation and they're even talking about dropping that down to 22 weeks gestation.
Read moreA lot of children born more than 6 weeks premature, develop some kind of mental abnormality/problem…
Karen Kennedy
Mother of 3
I am a mother of 3 autistic children, all born fullterm with no complications at birth. Our little tribe may come down to genetics. A nuerologists put it o me this way. If I maybe autistic and my husband maybe autistic, then the chances of the autism gene increases tenfold as we got together and started a family. My husband and I grew up during the 1970's and autism was to our knowledge not heard. I remember going to school with a girl who had down syndrome and a profoundly deaf boy but we were never…
Read moreBob Buckley
ASD advocate
The ABS 2009 SDAC data (see http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4428.0 ) shows that 74% of people with ASD have severe or profound disability; which suggests they are not just "trouble makers". Maybe some of the other 26% fall in that category but most (74%) people diagnosed with ASD in 2009 have severe or profound disability that is unlikely to have gone unnoticed in the past (despite claims to the contrary, see http://a4.org.au/a4/node/189 ).
Timothy Cleary
logged in via Facebook
I'm a parent of an ASD kiddy and have often thought about why there seems to be more of it about now than before. I've come up with two theories.
Read moreMy son was born 9 weeks premature. The medical staff warned us at the time that prems are more likely to have issues later in life such as learning, speech & developmental delays. I'm guessing that 50 years ago, most hospitals did not have the skills or equipment to help such a baby survive. Mother Nature would have simply not allowed such babies to…
Cynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
Leo Kanner particpated with several of his colleagues at Johns Hopkins University in writing a compendium of every neurological disease know to man in the mid-1930s. Nothing even closely resembling autism was included in this compendium. Kanner said in 1943 when he described the first cases that nothing like that syndrome had ever been seen or described ever before, that it was a new syndrome. The pertussis vaccine did not come into widespead use before the 1940s, but several pertussis vaccines…
Read moreGrendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
Cynthia, I HIGHLY recommend that you read Kanner's original 1943 paper which can be found here. http://www.aspires-relationships.com/articles_autistic_disturbances_of_affective_contact.htm#Discussion
Read the case studies carefully. While the paper was published in 1943 the cases commenced in the late 1930s and into the early 1940a - well before any of the vaccines you blame for autism were in use. All, or almost all the children were born in the mid 1930s and were already being seen by doctors…
Read moreCynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
Further evidence that it is the vaccines that are causing most of the rise in cases of autism is that the Merck Manual defines encephalitis as a brain inflammation caused by either a disease or vaccines. The package inserts of most vaccines list autism as one of the documented side effects (the result of the encephalitic brain damage). The Amish in the U.S., most of whom maintain a traditional way of life which doesn't include vaccination, have an extremely low rate of autism, and it is found only…
Read moreGrendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
Cynthia, you are correct that encephalitis can be caused by disease and vaccines. In fact it is one of the key reasons that a vaccine is considered a lower risk than the disease. If you consider the MMR vaccine for example less than one child in 1 million are risk of encephalitis from the vaccine. However the risk of encephalitis from measles itself is greater than one child in every 5000 who have measles. In the United States the mortality rate from measles is 3 in every thousand children who catch…
Read moreCynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
Grendels:
I appreciate your sending me the links and the information about the children included in Kanner's initial 1943 study in which he describes the first known cases of autism. But I must reiterate that, while the pertussis vaccine did not come into general use until the 1940s, it was first developed in the early 1900s, and its prototypes were given to the children primarily of wealthy families until public health programs began subsidizing its use in every social class in the 1960s. It was a puzzle to explain the occurrence for several decades of such a strange syndrome only in well-to-do, educated families. Now, of course, the riddle has been solved.
Helen Duyster
logged in via Facebook
Cynthia Parker, you couldn't be any further from the truth. My professional back ground and 5 years of uni doing research and also just talking to parents with children with autism, shows that there's no connection between autism and vaccines like the pertussis one. As I said, there are 3 kids in my son's playgroup who did not get vaccinated, yet still developed autism. Go figure. Must be a coincidence eh?
The thing is, pro-vaxxers and anti-vaxxers will never ever see eye to eye. I do not want to…
Read moreCynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
To Helen Duyster:
Read moreI respect your desire not to continue the discussion any longer. I am unfortunately mired in it since I have a daughter who was vaccine-damaged and suffers from autism now. I don't think vaccines are the only cause of autism, there are many chemicals in the environment now which often damage the brain significantly. Some autistic children have mothers who got vaccines or Rhogam shots during pregnancy and some live near mercury-producing power plants. There are undoubtedly other…
Cynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
To Lucy and David Howard:
Read moreIt is good to think about all possible factors that could affect the spiraling rates of autism, like air pollutants and even noise, but it's important to consider that in the U.S. autism rates are very high even in unpolluted areas, and are low even in large, noisy cities in Scandinavia. There is no autism among unvaccinated Amish (the majority), only one case in an Amish boy who lives near a coal-burning electrical plant that emits mercury into the air. The Merck Manual…
Grendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
"Yes, some of the vaccine-preventable diseases can kill or cripple, but so can the vaccines."
Risk is judged on how many per thousand will die. The diseases kill and maim at many thousands of times the rate that the vaccine causes injury.
Sue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
Cynthia Parker - your Amish example is a common myth repeated in anti-vaccination circles. It is neither true taht the Amish don't vaccinate (many no) nor that their community doesn't have autism (they do).
One cannot help but sym[athise with you as a parent caring for a child that you feel has been harmed, but this issue has been extensively investigated, and your assumptions about vaccines are not supported. Death rates from vaccination are vanishingly small - almost non-existent, and the overwhelming majority of side-effects are mild and temporary.
When it comes to newborns and Hep B vaccine, the same Neonatal ICU nurse and doctors who recommend vaccination are the ones that keep tiny premature babies alive. Theya re experts on the immune systems of babies.
Cynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
Sue,
Read moreDan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill, in The Age of Autism, p. 252, have this to say about the Amish with autism:
"There are just a few of them in the U.S., with an overall population of close to two hundred thousand Amish (over two-thirds of whom reside in three states). If we had applied a recent estimate for autism prevalence of 1 in 150 (now, 1 in 88 of those born in 2000, more in younger groups), we would have expected to find quite a large autistic population among the Amish, well over a thousand…
Grendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
Cynthia, Olmstead's work was a while ago now and several follow up studies have demonstrated that not only was his approach seriously flawed but his data was wrong. On both the points he made. The Amish do vaccinate, and they do have autism,
http://blogs.plos.org/thepanicvirus/2011/06/28/anecdotal-amish-dont-vaccinate-claims-disproved-by-fact-based-study/
Cynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
Coincidentally enough, Dan Olmsted put this update on the Amish and autism question on Age of Autism today:
http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/05/dan-olmsted-the-amish-all-over-again.html#more
Grendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
It doesn't add anything at all to his original work - he comments on a paper that looked at the Amish and the prevelence of allergies, then he went into speculation about the causes. The problem is that Olmstead has already decided in his own mind that vaccines are to blame and accepts that hypothesis in the face of other more likely explanations. This confirmation bias makes his work as a journalist unreliable at best.
We are talking about a genetically homogenous group living an agrarian lifestyle - so many potential explanations and he jumps straight to vaccination as a cause. This is bad science (not science at all) on his part. Vaccination rates vary across Amish populations but they certainly do vaccinate.
Cynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
Grendels,
Read moreDr. Robert Sears in The Vaccine Guide said that there are a lot of credible studies implicating vaccines in causing the many auto-immune diseases we have mentioned, including autism. He said if it turns out that they are correct, then the damage caused by vaccines will be much greater than the harm that would have been caused by the vaccine-preventable diseases. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein says that none of the thousands of unvaccinated children in his practice has autism, and that vaccine damage…
Grendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
Cynthia, all of the sources you cite are from a similar viewpoint - have you read more widely than Drs Sears and Eisenstein?
Also if you are picking Dr Sears as a source you should know that he holds the view that mercury does not cause autism:
"As for the flu shot, here’s my opinion. Because mercury is a known neurotoxin, all the science in the world won’t convince many parents to give their baby a mercury-containing flu shot, especially when they have the option to get a non-mercury version…
Read moreCynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
Grendels,
Read moreI actually don't care for Dr. Sears, he's made his name from his alternative vaccine schedule, and he does his best to skate between suggesting vaccines can damage and recommending that children get most of them. He's raised a lot of alarm about the danger aluminum in vaccines presents, and I agree with him, but I don't think he acts on deeply-held beliefs, I think he's fundamentally self-promoting.
I think your statistics on the Amish come from the blog LeftBrainRightBrain, they found…
Grendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
I'm not sure whether you want me to accept what Bob Sears says or not now? Can he be trusted as a source or not, or only when he says what you agree with. Frankly I would consider his view untrustworthy as it does not appear to be based on evidence and thus I would seek better advice.
"Dr. Sears couldn't possibly give up the niche he's carved for himself, which renders not very important his opinion on the dangers of individual vaccines."
"Dr. Eisenstein's practice treats a lot of Amish, and…
Read moreCynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
Grendels,
Read moreHow old is your son now? My daughter will be twelve on May 5, so her experience of hep-B, encephalitic reaction, and subsequent autism was nearly twelve years ago.
The Prevnar vaccine itself has caused a lot of death and disability, but if it would have saved your son, I certainly wish that it had been available then for you,
I wish now that I had rushed my daughter to the ER after rocking her for several hours that first night of May 9, 2000, when the screaming went on and on endlessly…
Grendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
Cynthia,
Read moreI empathise with the difficulties your family has faced. My boy turns 10 in 2012 and struggles in a variety of areas. We have been fortunate to be able to access some good therapy services - first speech therapy and then a combination of physical and occupational therapy that has been wonderful in assisting him to understand himself and communicate his needs. We also have an excellent paediatrician - we had to wait for years to get an appointment at all, but it has been well worth it. My…
Cynthia Parker
logged in via Facebook
Grendels,
Read moreI appreciate your thoughtful letter. I forget whether I told you that the same day I got a tetanus booster before I went to Mexico for the first time when I was nineteen, both my arms were paralyzed for two days. My dorm roommate had to carry my tray in the cafeteria and help me dress, because both arms were very painful and I couldn't move them. I learned not long ago that it must have been brachial neuropathy, seen usually in someone who has gotten a lot of tetanus vaccines. I later…
Grendelus Malleolus
Senior Nerd
Cynthia,
I have also enjoyed having a respoectful discussion with someonewho holds a different view. In my experience on this issue that is rare.
As for MS - I hope you are receiving good care. The link below is to a study I have been watching and from which I hope there are some published results soon: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00671138
It may be of interest.
will bayley
holistic health care
I am answering this forum as a person who has suffered the ravages of partial autism there have been 83 cases of vaccine induced autism already paid by the US governent and pharmaceutical companies a part of the settlement is thay cannot make further comment about their particular case or pay out which is believed to be in the multi millions
Read moreI treat autism ADD ADHD Aspergers in my clinic
we are fortunate to have some of the worlds latest and up to date equipment for assessing and repairing some…