Explainer: what is short selling?

Short sellers are often portrayed by the media to be the villains of the financial markets. They are usually presented as evil traders that drive down the prices of good companies. However, the academic research on short selling typically provides evidence more consistent with them being heroes. They…

Qmct3sxr-1347840963
Are short sellers heroes or villains of financial markets? Image from www.shutterstock.com

Short sellers are often portrayed by the media to be the villains of the financial markets. They are usually presented as evil traders that drive down the prices of good companies. However, the academic research on short selling typically provides evidence more consistent with them being heroes. They identify over-valued companies and help restore more accurate prices. They also provide liquidity to the market.

Recent regulations that banned short selling have been shown to have a detrimental rather than beneficial impact on markets.

What is short selling?

Short selling means that you are selling something that you do not own. Most people struggle to understand how this is possible or why it is allowed. A short seller will sell a stock if they believe the price of the stock is going to decline in the future. Therefore, they sell at a high price in the hope of buying the stock back when the price declines.

In order to short sell, the seller must borrow the stock from someone who owns it. In return, the short seller pays a fee to the party lending them the stock. In addition, if the price of the stock rises after the short seller sells the stock, they will also be required to pay a margin to cover the potential loss of the short seller being required to buy the stock back at a higher price. When the short seller buys back the stock, the stock loan is terminated. The short seller’s profit or loss is the difference between the sale price and the purchase price.

Short selling is more risky than buying a stock because the potential losses are unlimited. When someone buys a stock, the maximum amount that they can lose is the price they paid for the stock. When someone short sells a stock, they lose more as the price of the stock rises.

How common is short selling?

Short selling is common. In the US equity market, short selling accounts for approximately 40% of the dollar value traded. In Australia, the level of short selling is considerably lower at around 13% of the dollar value traded.

Since the financial crisis, the Australian regulators have introduced a comprehensive disclosure regime for short selling. This regime makes it easy for market participants to identify the outstanding short positions and the level of shorting activity in the market. Short positions must be reported to ASIC on a daily basis. ASIC aggregates this information and reports a daily aggregate level of short positions outstanding to the market. In addition, the level of short selling activity must be reported to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) on a daily basis. ASX aggregates this information and reports the aggregate daily level of short selling in each stock to the market.

What can we learn from short sellers?

High levels of short selling in a particular stock suggest that the market perceives that stock to be overvalued. Academic research in the US has shown that short sellers are informed investors. Heavily shorted stocks underperform lightly shorted stocks by approximately 15% per annum.

This evidence suggests that short sellers are skilled at identifying overvalued stocks and that on average they are able to profit from taking a short position in these stocks.

Do short sellers provide any other benefits?

Short sellers also offer additional liquidity to the market. Recent academic research in the US market has shown that some short sellers act as liquidity providers – stepping into the market to provide liquidity when the cost of liquidity is high. A study by an Australian fund manager suggests that short sellers are also significant liquidity providers in the Australian market. This study showed that the ban on short selling by Australian regulators during the financial crisis resulted in significant reductions in liquidity.

But can’t short sellers manipulate the market?

Some investors and companies raise concerns about short sellers manipulating stock prices down in order to profit on their short position. Oddly, people seem to be less concerned about the price of a stock being manipulated upwards by someone with a long position in a stock. Regulatory attention should focus on detecting and prosecuting manipulative trading regardless of whether the manipulator is pushing the price of the stock up or down or whether the manipulator is a long or a short seller.

Join the conversation

12 Comments sorted by

  1. Laszlo O'Vari

    logged in via email @fixia.net

    I do not claim to be an expert on finance. But, as everyone else, I watched the GFC unfold.

    Based on that I have a problem with the article.

    First, the word 'investor' is used in relation to the equity market. This is a loaded term, carrying positive connotations. The problem is that most of the stuff that is going on on the equity market has nothing to with investment.

    Investor is a person who pays upfront, buying a long term revenue stream. Buying a lot of BHP shares and keeping them for…

    Read more
    1. Mike Stuart

      jaffle-maker

      In reply to Laszlo O'Vari

      The article has attempted to provide the reader with a textbook explanation and some real-world examples of the functionality and application of short-selling. To that end it is useful and clear.

      @Laszlo O'Vari the GFC had nothing to do with short-selling. The GFC was created due to inflated property markets based on excessive lending to borrowers well beyond their means. Loose regulation allowed these financial instruments to be repackaged and on-sold which, for some reason, disguised the risk…

      Read more
    2. Roy Niles

      logged in via Facebook

      In reply to Laszlo O'Vari

      There is nothing intrinsically wrong with gambling. Everything we do is to some extent a gamble. There is however a propensity for some, if not all, of us to cheat at gambling. Especially problematic when it comes to those who run and essentially self-regulate the markets.

      report
  2. Mark Gregory

    Senior Lecturer in Electrical and Computer Engineering at RMIT University

    Hi Carole,

    thank you for the explanation.

    I would appreciate naked short selling and automated trading added to this article. As an engineer who understands the design of gambling systems, it is hard to see what difference there is when naked short selling and automated trading are added to a stock exchange. It appears to be deliberate effort to increase the "gamble" - by selling a naked stock it is hoped that the sell trigger can be achieved bringing about a fall in stock price and if this is large enough then the naked seller can generate quite a return.

    It appears to be the ever increasing need for derivatives to drive the level of gambling on exchanges, is it just like the need for new plays on poker machines at the casino?

    report
  3. Garry Baker

    resarcher

    Whilst the editorial may be well intended, it misses a few points - not least, long ago stock markets once were forums where mum and dad "investors" used to choose a parking spot for their money. Time on and the parasites of the stock exchange have made wheeling and dealing a life of its own - the gaming set. Yet they still refer to themselves as investors, using terms such as "price discovery" to justify their participation. Short selling does have benefits, insofar as it brings those ramping…

    Read more
  4. William Ferguson

    Software Developer

    Interesting article, but as @Laszo points out the original intent of the share market has been perverted. The original intent was
    1) to raise capital to start or expand a business
    2) a means to trade part of an ongoing business

    Further enhancements allowed participants to insure against abrupt future prices changes
    3) futures contracts
    4) derivatives over existing holdings
    These add financial stability, just like insurance does.

    But more recently the other forms have come to dominate the…

    Read more
    1. Roy Niles

      logged in via Facebook

      In reply to William Ferguson

      Stocks are heavily shorted for good reasons, often because of insider knowledge, done by savvy investors.
      Tautologies involve saying the same thing twice. Short sales tend to be intelligently caused and causes tend to have expected effects.

      report
    2. Roy Niles

      logged in via Facebook

      In reply to Roy Niles

      I should add that over a twenty year period I worked as a PI for attorneys and other clients investigating securities' fraud cases, sometimes having to represent the fraudsters, but mostly uncovering the details of the frauds. Pump and dump cases were a specialty. So my perspective is not from the academic or regulative outside, but from the inside view of the actual game players.

      report
  5. Philip Howell

    Solicitor

    The article seems to be a fairly orthodox defence of short selling and is useful in explaining its extent and supposed justifications. However it does not examine the apparent irrationality of the stock 'lender'. Firstly, it is not a loan. Stock 'lending' involves a sale with an agreement to re-purchase. The 'lender' is exposed to the risk of the short seller going bankrupt before he/she can 'return' the stock. Secondly, and more importantly, the whole purpose of short selling is to profit from a…

    Read more
    1. Roy Niles

      logged in via Facebook

      In reply to Philip Howell

      (And there is everything wrong with gambling - it permits people to acquire value where they have created none).
      All profits from our labors are acquired values, created by our more or less intelligent strategies. The wrongness would be in any cheating that was a part of the strategies. And cheating in the selfishly self regulated stock market is endemic.

      report
  6. Baz M

    Law graduate & politics/markets analyst

    Awesome article. Thank you Carole for summarising the great usefulness of short selling. In my experience there are two reasons why people jump up and down when it comes to short selling.
    1. They don't realise the complexities behind it and how inherently the only way someone can make money from short selling is recognising that a financial instrument has been popped up way too high and is a bubble waiting to happen, and short sellers ringing alarms about this is a GOOD THING. Just ask all those…

    Read more
  7. Ngoc Luan Ho Trieu

    logged in via Facebook

    Nowadays when one enters the equity market with the conventional academic view that market is where people mobilize their financial resources to where they are most needed and consequently most profitable in the economy then one would easily burn their hard earned money because of the short selling coupled with BOT high frequency trading activities. To make matter worse dinkum mom and dad investors who underestimate the virtual world of the internet but have to be extremely careful to avoid putting their hard earned cash into many listed companies which have nothing but flashy websites and glossy periodical reports containg professionally cut false information produced by "clever but crooked accountants" (CbCA) acting as CEO, CFO, GM...I think false manipulated information increases the inefficiency of the financial market and slows down industrial and business growth. It is time for market regulators to act for real entrepreneurs' and true investors' sake.

    report