UK United Kingdom

If you don’t like people tweeting about cancer, don’t read it

If there is a set of rules about coping with cancer, I have never seen it. Perhaps in some circles a commonly accepted method exists. If so, I remain in the dark, despite my own experiences with this disease…

11,000+ followers seem to like it. Twitter

If there is a set of rules about coping with cancer, I have never seen it. Perhaps in some circles a commonly accepted method exists. If so, I remain in the dark, despite my own experiences with this disease.

Equally uninformed are many fellow cancer patients who are coping, in remission or “cured.” Only now we’re being told in a blog by Bill Keller in the New York Times and another by his wife Emma G Keller in the Guardian (as I write removed from the site, pending investigation) that certain ways of talking about our condition are self-serving, inappropriate, and in bad taste.

Bogus rules of coping with cancer

Many bloggers have responded to Keller’s article in which he criticises a blog and Twitter feed by Lisa Adams, where she shares with some 10,000 followers what it is like living with Stage 4 cancer. Keller sees her “online omnipresence” as unsettling, especially when compared to his father-in-law’s “calmer” passing, and wrote:

Lisa Adams’s choice is in a sense the opposite. Her aim was to buy as much time as possible to watch her three children grow up. So she is all about heroic measures. She is constantly engaged in battlefield strategy with her medical team.

There is always the prospect of another research trial to excite her hopes. She responds defiantly to any suggestion that the end is approaching.

Keller does give Adams credit for participating in research trials, even if he feels the need to refer to her as an “eager” subject. He recognises that she has benefited from her blogging and the social support she garners. He continued:

Her digital presence is no doubt a comfort to many of her followers. On the other hand, as cancer experts I consulted pointed out, Adams is the standard-bearer for an approach to cancer that honours the warrior, that may raise false hopes, and that, implicitly, seems to peg patients like my father-in-law as failures.

War on cancer cells is only one of many metaphors cancer patients use to mentally cope. It sure beats depression. Keller may have a point here, though. There are no Admirals or Generals of Cancer – no superior officers.

But coping with cancer is surely a battle. I learned that from Bernie Siegel, a former paediatric surgeon turned writer, who taught me to meditate and to fight thoughts that get in the way of recovery.

Cancer is arduous

For years I was reluctant to talk publicly about cancer, so I can visit Keller’s perspective on this. When people applauded after I was introduced at one fundraising event, I felt undeserving. I’ve learned, however, that people don’t applaud because I won or made it this far when someone else didn’t. They clap because coping with cancer is an arduous journey. Just as often, they’re remembering someone they knew and loved.

There are ample targets online without going after a cancer patient who is coping in the best way for her and who is helping many people along the way. Keller’s desire to praise those who “accept an inevitable fate with grace and courage” is fine. But Adams is coping with the challenge of a lifetime and doing so with her own style of grace and courage.

If you believe someone is overdoing their writing about an illness, don’t read what they write. If you haven’t had Stage 4 cancer – or any of a host of challenging and often frightening illnesses – then give us all a break and find another topic. Start a different trend. Leave the rest of us to getting on with things the best way we know how.

Kathleen Reardon is author of Shadow Campus and has been a regular blogger for Huffington Post since 2005. She also blogs at

Sign in to Favourite

Join the conversation

3 Comments sorted by

  1. Steven Hirschler

    PhD Candidate, Politics at University of York

    There can be no excess of articles or websites dedicated to coping with cancer, in my opinion. When my father was diagnosed with Stage IV non-hodgkin's lymphoma a few years ago, the internet was an extremely important place to find information that went unexplained by medical practitioners. There's a danger, of course, in running the risk of 'self-diagnosis', but being able to see how other people are choosing to cope with their illness goes a long way in helping the individual and family come to terms with reality. From others' experiences, you can get a sense of how long you might expect to live and what steps can be taken to access specialised treatment if typical treatment is no longer effective. Thanks for this article.

  2. Robin Huber

    Graphic Artist

    Granted I have not read the original articles referenced here, but based on the quoted passages, I'm not seeing how "we’re being told...that certain ways of talking about our condition are self-serving, inappropriate, and in bad taste," or that Keller sees Adams' online presence as "unsettling." I kept rereading the quotes, thinking I missed something. There is a questioning of the warrior attitude in battling cancer, but that can hardly be characterized as overly critical. It seems that either Reardon is projecting a bit here, or she's not chosen the right bits to quote.

  3. Stephen Joyce

    logged in via Facebook

    I have been in remission from non-hodgkins lymphoma for nearly 3 years. While undergoing chemotherapy I found blogging about my experiences extremely beneficial and cathartic. I did not care whether anyone else read it. A distilled version was printed in a writing anthology. I would advise anyone in the same position to write about their feelings whether for themselves or a wider audience. Thanks for the sensible conclusions in your article.