Dental and health policy experts have welcomed a $4 billion dental health package from the Federal Government, which specifically targets children and pensioners.
The package provides $2.7 billion in new funding for subsidised dental care for more than 3 million children, and $1.3 billion for services for adults on low incomes, including pensioners and concession card holders.
“While Medicare and free hospital care have been a basic right for Australians for decades, millions of people in this country still go without adequate dental care,” Health Minister Tanya Plibersek said.
Stephen Leeder, director of the Menzies Centre for Health Policy at University of Sydney, said it’s never made sense that dentistry has fallen outside the Medicare basket.
“Fundamentally they’re rectifying a very simple problem, which is the exclusion of dental care from the philosophy of Medicare.”
The package will make an enormous difference to the 400,000 Australians on public dental health waiting lists around the country, said Mike Morgan, program leader for oral health at the University of Melbourne.
“We don’t know how many people are not putting themselves on public health waiting lists around the country because they think it’s too hard,” Dr Morgan said.
Universal access to publicly funded dental care is a major plank of The Greens’ policy, and improving the system was a key item pledged by Prime Minister Julia Gillard in return for the Greens’ support after the 2010 election. The additional $4 billion in spending comes on top of $515 million announced in the 2012-13 Federal Budget to target dental waiting lists and training and support for people in rural and remote areas.
“Cost is an issue, but so are other things like availability of services,” said Dr Morgan. “This not only reduces the cost but also promises workforces and infrastructure, particularly in the bush and those areas where there tends to be a greater level of low income and poverty.”
Children aged 2-17 in Family Tax Benefit Part A-eligible families will be entitled to subsidised basic dental treatment, capped at $1,000 per child over a two-year period. The government says this initiative aims to address dental decay in children, which has been increasing since the 1990s.
Ian McAuley, lecturer in public sector finance at University of Canberra, said the package is a well-targeted initiative.
“But as a targeted largely ‘welfare’ system it doesn’t make much progress to universalism, and makes no progress towards integration of dental with other aspects of health care.”
Mr McAuley said it’s a pity the government hasn’t done a cost-benefit analysis, as it would likely stand up very well.
“I suspect that it will have considerable offsetting public and private savings not only in dental care but also in other health care. In fact those benefits go beyond health care, because good dental health has wider benefits. For example, poor dental health is an impediment to overall workforce productivity.”
Mr McAuley said he gave the government high marks for squeezing money out of a tight budget and for filling in some gaps, but no marks for progress on systemic reform.
With the $4 billion to be spent over 6 years, Mr McAuley said some people will still fall through the gaps. “We spend $7.7 billion a year on dentistry (2009-10), of which $4.7 billion is out-of-pocket (i.e. not covered by either private or public insurance).”
Ms Plibersek said poor childhood health leads to poor adult oral health, which can have wide-ranging impacts on general health and wellbeing.
“There’s no doubt poor oral health will impact on general health so anything that addresses oral health is a good thing,” Dr Morgan said.
However Dr Leeder said he was less convinced of the linkage between oral health and general health, urging a focus on the issue at hand.
“I think we’ve got to look at dental care in its own right…We’ve got to press on with the main game which is to make sure people who need dental care, restorative or preventative, have reasonable access to it and are not denied it on the basis of cost.”
Dr Morgan said continued focus on water fluoridation and workforce development was required, but added the package was a “big win” for dentistry in Australia.
Riddley Walker
.
The headline is misleading. This was always a Greens initiative. http://greensmps.org.au/denticare
Chris Weir
Analyst
If it was a result of a Greens initiative someone has pulled the rug from under them during negotiation and guess what?
There was no floor.
The withdrawal of the Chronic Diseases Dental Scheme was vigorously opposed by the Greens and the LNP in the Senate on previous attempts to can it by the Labor Government.
Wade Macdonald
Technician
I fully support this initiative.
I also support 'Dental Rescue Days' for the underpriviledged.
The great work these professional vounteers do for so many makes me proud to be an Aussie.
Chris Weir
Analyst
What happens for the mostly aged people who would have been eligible under the now defunct Chronic Diseases scheme?
No real detail there, and from what is available the whole scheme is aligned to kids.
Which is no bad thing, they are mostly cuter than old people.
The funding shouldn't be a worry, it appears to be less pa than the existing system.
Jason Bryce
logged in via Twitter
Chris Weir is right.
Read moreThis is a huge step back to the dark ages of dental treatment for poor and sick people.
They should call this the Plibersek tooth extraction plan.
The Chronic Disease scheme provided poor, sick and elderly people with $4,000 of non-cosmetic dental treatment by the dentist of their choice every two years, as long as they were on a GP health care plan and the dental treatment was assessed as needed to improve their overall health.
That meant, for the first time ever in Australia…
Chris O'Neill
Telecommunications Engineer
"That meant, for the first time ever in Australia, poor people were getting root canals, crowns, implants and other procedures that Plibersek describes as "over-servicing"."
I didn't read everything she said but to describe those procedures, especially root canals and crowns, as "over-servicing" is appalling.
That said, Australia really should have free check-ups and treatment available for all children. At least that will encourage their parents to think about dental health even if they've given up on their own and allow children to know what good dental health is when they become adults. If they let it go then at least they'll know what they could aspire to.
Gabrielle Henry
logged in via Facebook
Two of my relatives have accessed the Chronic diseases scheme and all they could get from private dentists for the money was to pull out all their teeth and give them ill fitting dentures. If they had spent the money on a root canal then they would have had only one healthy tooth and a mouth full of problems. Perhaps some contributors have no idea of what dentists approved by this scheme were charging people.
Jason Bryce
logged in via Twitter
Gabrielle - Under CDDS patients got more than $4,000 worth of treatment of their choice by a private dentist of their choice every two years. At the end of two years, they could renew their GP health care plan and be eligible for another $4,000.
That money can fund a lot of tooth saving root canals - a lot more than one as you seem to think.
But patients could choose to have their teeth extracted if they wanted, that's called patient choice. But now your relatives have no choice - they get to have their teeth pulled and sent home with panadol. Some contributors have no idea what public dental means.
Chris Weir
Analyst
There may well have been flaws in the administration of CDDS.
Flaws can be fixed.
Canning the whole scheme is like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
I write also from experience, where one of my relatives got the necessary treatment to save her teeth instead of a holus bolus extraction and as well a small partial denture.
If ones teeth are beyond saving I guess that makes a difference.
I suppose it's who one uses.
Certainly considering the number of actual treatments done under the life of the scheme it wasn't all just squandered and in any case what now?
Jason Lewis
Owner at Centre for Professional Development
I agree with Dr. Morgan's statement and i think its the time to enhance our policies and take dental health and education same as general health issues.
It is a forward step taken by our Government to facilitate poor and unprivileged sections of our society, i appreciate.
It was very informative and helpful
Thank you