The rising level of obesity, along with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other related diseases, is predicted to slow down or reverse the decline in mortality seen in most Western countries in recent decades. But closer examination shows the picture is more complicated than that.
Obesity rates have been increasing in developed countries since the 1950s (albeit slowly at first). And since the 1960s, deaths from disease have steadily decreased in most developed countries while life expectancy has consistently increased.
It seems obesity’s negative impact on mortality may be outweighed by other factors favourably influencing life expectancy. In the United States, for instance, cholesterol, smoking, and physical activity levels have all improved in recent years. Indeed, the rate of decline in mortality might have been even faster if it weren’t for the increasing prevalence of diabetes.
But some researchers predict that the negative effects of increasing levels of obesity will soon outweigh the benefits from reductions in smoking.
Improved medical treatment of some of the pathways linking obesity to mortality may have also blunted obesity’s negative impact. Hypertension, for example, has been better managed in recent years.
The impact of obesity may itself have been overestimated because its main adverse effects are experienced by a minority of the population. The best estimates of the association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality suggest that the mortality risk from excess body weight increases from a BMI of 25 but isn’t substantial until BMI exceeds 32 or 35.
Between 15% and 25% of the US population have BMIs in this range. While this is a significant proportion, it is nevertheless a minority. And the relationship between obesity and health appears to reverse in old age. In old age, people who have low body weight are at higher risk of disability and mortality. But this reversal may be due to weight loss in old age due to disease.
Indeed, body weight may not be a significant risk factor for mortality in itself. Instead it might simply be a surrogate marker for a particular lifestyle, or a particular diet, physical activity level, and genetic factors. If this were so, obese individuals would represent a heterogeneous group of people with high body weight for different reasons, some of which may not be strongly related to morbidity or mortality.
But the negative impact of recent obesity trends, including longer duration of living with obesity, may not have yet affected life expectancy due to the lag time between the onset of obesity and disease. And the adverse impact of obesity may be due to both its severity and duration.
As extreme obesity is becoming increasingly common and people are becoming overweight and obese earlier in life, it may be with more recent cohorts that we observe the deleterious impact of obesity on life expectancy.
Recent mortality statistics demonstrate, for the first time in over 25 years, a slight decline in US life expectancy. But diabetes and cardiovascular mortality rates have maintained a continual decline.
Further, studies of obesity’s effect on cardiovascular disease and mortality, and of the positive effects from weight loss after bariatric surgery, suggest relatively short lag times of ten years and less (two years for bariatric surgery).
Then there’s the “obesity paradox” in which survival from acute events such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, and dialysis for renal failure is better in patients who are overweight or obese.
The reasons for this are unknown, but its unlikely to be simply that very unwell patients lose weight due to the severity of their illness. It’s also possible that diseases such as hypertension and diabetes may be more aggressive and of a different origin in lean individuals than when associated with obesity.
Considerations such as lag time, duration of exposure to obesity, and increasing proportions of the population with severe obesity suggest that obesity may in the future have a considerable impact on life expectancy. But there are also important reasons why obesity may not be strongly linked to life expectancy, except at the extremes of the weight distribution.
Several studies suggest that obesity’s main adverse impact is the risk of becoming disabled, rather on life expectancy itself. It’s also possible that health and life expectancy gains could be even greater if it weren’t for the increasing prevalence of extreme obesity.
James Jenkin
EFL Teacher Trainer
I'd suggest obesity is a sign of great human achievement. It means we know how to feed people. The WHO says malnutrition is the biggest public health threat - and in twenty years the proportion of malnourished people worldwide has fallen from 19% to 12% (http://www.fao.org/hunger/en/), despite rapid population growth. That's great news.
We should stop wallowing in our first-world problems. We know what it takes to lose weight - eat less, exercise more - so if we want to lose weight, we should get off our fat backsides and do something about it (me included). If people couldn't be bothered, it's their problem.
Tim O'Hare
Science Student, University of Melbourne
James,
I'd suggest obesity is a sign of great human failure. We have failed to value our health as a priority, instead we are over indulging in excessive amounts of food and lacking exercise. Yes, it is great that malnutrition is decreasing, however 12% is still far too high a figure when there are people eating too much.
If people can't be bothered it is their problem. It is also a problem for the healthcare system that loses millions of dollars treating the easily preventable symptoms of obesity.
Gordon Smith
Private citizen
I agree with James that it is simply a reflection of an affluent society. Tim, I find it hard to see any evidence that it is a sign of great human failure.
The risk is that we develop an "obesity industry" that will feed itself greedily without any influence on health outcomes and people's personal habits.
Moha Adam Isack
Network Admin at Somaliweyn Media Center
A Fatter World, Yet Fewer Cases of High Blood Pressure
Read moreLast week a study of one hundred ninety-nine countries and territories confirmed what many people may have already noticed. People around the world are getting fatter. The study found that obesity has almost doubled since nineteen eighty.
Majid Ezzati at Imperial College London led the research team. He says the results show that obesity, high blood pressure and high cholesterol are no longer just found in wealthy nations. These are now worldwide…
Colin MacGillivray
Retired architect
"Indeed, body weight may not be a significant risk factor for mortality in itself." Does any study point out or take into account that many obese people must be quite fit.
With my BMI of around 23 I'd be much fitter if I carried a 25kg load around my abdomen every day on my morning round of golf. (Actually no golf at present, slipped and bust my fibula 2 weeks ago.)
Seamus Gardiner
Citizen
The problem is Colin that some of the 25 kg may be lining your arteries.
Comment removed by moderator.
Roque Mcdonald
logged in via email @live.vu.edu.au
I'm not sure on the statistics. But would the increasing improvement of Western Medicine through doctors, pharmaceuticals, surgeons etc be contributing much in relation to Obese people living longer particularly in their more senior years?
Pera Lozac
Heat management assistant
Social and medical scientist should really work seriously on their statistical skills. In most of the cases they lack some of basic significant parameters for a statistically sound study but nevertheless jump into conclusions that are often misleading and very damaging.
People go back to school and learn the basics on testing of the hypothesis or just stop using a tool that you clearly do not know how to use.
Comment removed by moderator.