#Occupy movement: different aims, but united by the importance of civil protest

The “Occupy” movement has swept the world in the last five weeks, as seems appropriate in this year of demonstrations by people tired of a clapped-out status quo. Of course, the Occupy movement is quite different to those that overran Tahrir Square or who now bravely withstand the bullets of the Syrian…

Occupy_iran
The Occupy movement: different agendas, but united by the right to civil disobedience.

The “Occupy” movement has swept the world in the last five weeks, as seems appropriate in this year of demonstrations by people tired of a clapped-out status quo.

Of course, the Occupy movement is quite different to those that overran Tahrir Square or who now bravely withstand the bullets of the Syrian state.

Yet economic downturns, coupled with extreme inequalities (whether it be between political elites, their cronies and the masses; or between economic elites which dominate economic and political space, and the “99%”), are a key factor in all of the protests in this epic year of discontent.

An Occupy Wall Street protester. AAP

The Occupy strand of protest seemed to start in New York with Occupy Wall Street, but protests in Greece (over austerity measures), Spain (mass youth unemployment) and Israel (rising costs of living) were earlier precursors.

The Occupy crowd’s main beef is with the iniquities wrought by disproportionate global and local corporate power, a grievance underscored in the US where former World Bank Economist Joseph Stiglitz has highlighted how the top 1% in that country control 40% of wealth and 25% of income.

However, that narrative is supplemented by other gripes, some of which are very general, some of which contradict and some of which seem quite “fringe”.

Occupy protests in Germany. AAP

Beyond that, their “demands” or “solutions” are unclear. This lack of an articulated manifesto has attracted much scorn, the idea being that unless they tell us what they want and how we get there, they should shut up and get out of our way.

But that’s not a fair criticism. Surely one can have a sense that the current system is unwell without having all of the solutions to fix it.

If you can’t validly protest the status quo without knowing exactly how to change it (particularly difficult for those without power who are most likely to be dissatisfied), that’s a playing field designed to entrench “the way it is” (whether one likes it or not).

Instead it is surely legitimate, as is happening with Occupy, to start conversations on change, whether they result in concrete steps or not. Part of the point of Occupy is to get people talking about political and economic systems and the possible need for change, and in that respect it is probably succeeding.

Occupy protests in Greece. AAP

The unwieldy nature of Occupy is partly due to its lack of leadership, a phenomenon that it shares with the demonstrators of Egypt, Tunisia, Bahrain, Syria et al.

It may be a function of how social media has been used to galvanise and organise the protests – there is no central hierarchy but there are many who are spreading the word, even to those not attending which expands the conversation.

A desire for inclusiveness has let many into the tent, and why not? It all adds to a new conversation which is not dominated by the “same old” powerbrokers.

(By the way, the sneering criticism that protesters are hypocritical for using technology misses the point: one can be unhappy with “bad” capitalism and greed, and use an iPhone).

So what of Australia and local Occupy protests? Sure, the economic problems and inequalities are not as bad here.

Occupy Melbourne protests turn violent. AAP

But does that matter? Can’t people express solidarity with the millions protesting overseas? Can’t they complain about disproportionate corporate power in Australia?

After all, a proposed mining tax was widely attacked for the government’s failure to consult adequately with big miners and was then fundamentally altered to accord with their demands.

In contrast, a few years ago the army was sent into Aboriginal communities without the same mainstream concerns over appropriate consultation.

Most cities overseas that have experienced Occupy protests have not forcibly evicted them, as occurred last weekend in Melbourne and Sydney.

Critics railed that the protesters were somehow harming others’ rights. The evidence of the detrimental impact of small camps (even smaller in the daytime as many protesters worked) in an often moribund square in Melbourne and in a very large square in Sydney, is anecdotal and equivocal.

Sure, some found them irritating, but I suspect that feeling was balanced by the curiosity and inquiry the protests prompted in others.

And the predictable laments of violence by politicians miss the point that no violence occurred before the evictions, and they fail to identify just who was perpetrating the violence during the evictions.

It’s not “violent” to fail to obey a police officer: it’s called civil disobedience, a historical phenomenon for which we should all be grateful.

As for the idea that the protesters have had a week to have their say so it’s time to go, The Australian was right to point out that the meter does not tick on free speech and assembly.

And the time should not vary according to whether the powers that be agree with or understand a particular protest.

Certainly, Melbourne mayor Robert Doyle’s motivations seem partially driven by his inability to comprehend what the protests are for, with that puzzlement convincing him they must be wrong and “bad”.

In contrast to Occupy Sydney and Melbourne, Clubs Australia has been bellowing its anti-pokies message for well over a week: so it makes a difference that it can pay?

And the conversations at the Occupy protests seem more likely to be enlightening and edifying than the tedious “debate” that dominates our current Federal Parliament, where politicians hammer the same old soundbites (“stop the boats”, “toxic tax”, “Julia lied”, “people smugglers’ business model”) … for far, far longer than a week.

Join the conversation

26 Comments sorted by

  1. Barry Bar

    Brain Surgeon

    Wow, I've never seen so many generalisations in a piece on this. Are you sure you're a bona fide academic?

    report
  2. Libby Mitchell

    logged in via Facebook

    I am a conservative, peaceful 62 year old woman who has had enough of watching big 'gambling business' over-rule consumer safety. My Victorian Minister for Gaming is also my Minister for Consumer Affairs. Currently pokies do not appear to meet demands of our national consumer protection laws. {refer Australian Consumer Law, Chapter 3, Division 4, Section 100: Transaction records for Consumers]. I wholly support Occupy Melbourne whose quest is to challenge corruption, much because I have had no ability to get this matter addressed...and little wonder when our government representative Mr Michael O'Brien wears two such conflicting 'hats' as Gaming and Consumer Affairs? Then not to be beaten...Mr O'Brien gets protected by legislation that prevents me from criticizing his lack of success in making pokies safe for consumer use. No wonder we support Occupy Melbourne...and no wonder our government wants to shut it down.

    report
  3. talie

    logged in via Twitter

    So many times I wanted to yell YES to this article:
    "Surely one can have a sense that the current system is unwell without having all of the solutions to fix it."
    We'd all need to have masters degrees in economics to understand how to fix the system (and even then probably not)... but we're not fools... we know it's not fair to have such inequality.
    "Part of the point of Occupy is to get people talking about political and economic systems and the possible need for change"
    This is really about all…

    Read more
  4. Roxane Paczensky

    Registered Nurse

    I am a 53 year old Registered Nurse and I attend Occupy Brisbane whenever I can in person and support the movement online when I can't.
    I agree with the author. The movement is creating a place where people can gather and express their frustration with a democratic system that is failing the people who created it in favour of entities, private and public. I'm too busy caring for people at work and caring for my family at home to understand why and how inequality is rising globally and nationally…

    Read more
  5. Libby Mitchell

    logged in via Facebook

    @ Talie? @ Roxane? I agree 1000% with what you have both said so very well here. Thank you. I know that government media monitors read such messages as these...so I hope our messages get sent 'higher up to somewhere' in our governments in Australia. I am using examples from my interest area, pokies gambling reform...but every disenfranchised citizen would have equally compelling issues that they want to be raised I guess. So WHY shut down our "Occupy" platform? Why not listen instead?

    It is time…

    Read more
  6. Andrew Hack

    IT Project Manager

    Protesting for the sake of protesting it seems to me. Their lack of understanding of what they want means they cannot and should not be taken seriously. Instead of wasting time standing around holding up signs with cliche slogans written on them how about spending some time to learn about what is that is making them so unhappy.

    Jealous of the riches of others, they simply want more of other people's money and want it to be served to them on a silver platter.

    Blaming capitalism just adds to the laziness. The system as it stands in the west is far from capitalist. It is corporatist; where the larger corporations get in bed with the government and squeeze out competition through regulations and subsidies. This can not occur in a real free-market capitalist system. However, I don't expect most OWS protestors to be content with that because under that system they will still not have more of other people's money.

    report
    1. Tommy Ace

      logged in via Facebook

      In reply to Andrew Hack

      There is no blame Andrew. Jealousy for those who cannot mentally achieve as much as the psychopaths who make billions maybe. But everyone gets jealous, does that take away from the message? Maybe for some.. but for others it gives them a chance to speak to real people, something that society has lost.

      There is no opportunity to speak on corruption within democracy, or awake those of bad faith. Media finally addressing it is something I've waited for quite some time.

      When people have a opportunity to speak about it, and we then see truth silenced by police and regulated by false media news stories, it brings back our sanity again. It gives us reconfirmation, that we are being lied to, and we are not alone.

      report
    2. Andrew Hack

      IT Project Manager

      In reply to Tommy Ace

      So they are to be content with what lame satisfaction they get from venting their frustration? That is a headless chicken parade.

      Am I greedy myself, that I am simply not satisfied with venting my dissatisfaction? That is all they are achieving. Diddly squat in my books.

      Several years ago I too had a feeling that something wasn't quite right and that there was something amiss with the systems of social and economic structure. But instead of whining that others had more money than I did (since to…

      Read more
    3. Martin Spencer

      PhD student at University of Melbourne

      In reply to Andrew Hack

      Good for you Andrew, now that you have the truth, what are you doing about it?

      By the way, how about these for "truth-in-paint-on-cardboard":
      - Women deserve a vote.
      - People should not be slaves.
      - Destruction of species is wrong.
      - Corporations should not trade with tyrants.
      ....(Hint: those last couple are still relevant)

      report
    4. Andrew Hack

      IT Project Manager

      In reply to Martin Spencer

      My point is in relation to that they seem to be unclear about exactly what they are unhappy about and how the problem can be fixed. If they really understood what was going on then they would be protesting in Washington, not in Wall Street.

      report
  7. Martin Spencer

    PhD student at University of Melbourne

    Why protest in Australia? NEWSFLASH: Globalisation happened.

    Australians are not isolated morally or economically from the rights of Chinese factory workers or the destruction of forests in Malaysia or Indonesia or the too-big-to-fail/bail-out policy of Washington.

    report
  8. Libby Mitchell

    logged in via Facebook

    @ Andrew Hack...Suffragettes succeeded by hitting the streets! Apartheid; Vietnam War? Protesting in the streets made a healthy impact on social thinking. so please do not try to defuse a potentially very large government problem here..by marginalizing it as a 'headless chicken parade'? Who are you to accuse anybody else from simply 'subscribing to slogans' anyway? How do you know what information any person is basing his views upon?

    If I say..."Licence ALL pokies users...OR BAN pokies". Is that…

    Read more
    1. Andrew Hack

      IT Project Manager

      In reply to Libby Mitchell

      In the cases of Apartheid and the Vietnam War I believe the protestors had a decent idea about what was upsetting them.

      What I am taking issue with here is the suggestion that protesting something without a clear understanding of what you're protesting as well as how your goals can be achieved is entirely pointless.

      report
  9. Libby Mitchell

    logged in via Facebook

    @ Martin Spencer: Excellent comments of yours there! Globalization HAS occurred thanks very much to the world wide web...and supposedly 'democratic' governments who ignore that impact will do so at their own peril. The party is over for bribing industries, paid lobbyists with 'spin', political donors and others who lean on governments to stop the majority will from winning through!

    Dr Maarten Stapper beat the corruption he reportedly witnessed in the CSIRO when chemical farming was officially supported, despite that doctor's research that proved that biological farming methods saved the land, protected our environment, improved the yield and kept more money in farmers' pockets! Was Dr Stapper a 'headless chicken' I wonder? I think not.

    report
    1. Andrew Hack

      IT Project Manager

      In reply to Libby Mitchell

      The party is far from over; it is really just beginning. As crises arise as the necessary consequences of government intervention the general population demand even more government intervention. Just have a look at the euro crisis. Greece goes bankrupt and the solution is to pile more debt on them. Does that make sense to you? The banks get bailed out at the expense of the taxpayers.

      We become more and more slaves to the debt-based monetary system.

      As people demand for more government intervention they become the useful idiots of the political elite who will use it as reason to increase their power. PR is a far more effective way of gaining power than direct totalitarianism. Just ask Julia Gillard as her Fabian Socialists have been very effective in achieving just that.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Society

      report
  10. Libby Mitchell

    logged in via Facebook

    Andrew Flack? I understand more of what you are meaning now. Yes I agree that the party is definitely just beginning, in that sense. I guess I meant that the time for governments and corrupt corporations to be kidding themselves that their activities are going unnoticed...is now definitely over. However I wonder Andrew if the apparent disorganization and lack of focus that you are noting are in fact normal parts of 'movement development' and a typical sign of immaturity that could be normal right…

    Read more
  11. Roxane Paczensky

    Registered Nurse

    Have you been to an Occupy Andrew? Have you had any conversations with a cross section of Occupiers? I have been and I have had them. Not once have I heard an anti-capitalist sentiment expressed. I have heard plenty of discontent about the obscenities being displayed by the humans at the top of the capitalist pyramids and their apparent disregard for the humans they exploit in the name of profit and their disregard of the environment in their persuit of profit to the extent that it effects the health…

    Read more
    1. Andrew Hack

      IT Project Manager

      In reply to Roxane Paczensky

      If you don't think there is any anti-capitalist sentiment then perhaps you could explain for me the meaning of the sign at the top of this article?
      I did say that I am relying on what I've seen in articles and news reports, but most of us know not to trust the MSM to cover the real story. I think the reason tv clip in the youtube I linked would sum it up well as I have a lot of trust in Peter Schiff due to the way he has campaigned against the debt-based money system and has (in my opinion) written…

      Read more
  12. Libby Mitchell

    logged in via Facebook

    Thank you Roxane for sharing your thoughts so well. I relate to everything you say here and though my own awareness of government / big business corruption was fired mostly by my growing ire and disrespect for our government handling of one particular industry, the gambling industry....I also readily understand the alarm that we should all be hearing re the wealth distribution issue globally. In fact such rabidly ruthless industries as the global gambling industry are contributing directly right…

    Read more
  13. Roxane Paczensky

    Registered Nurse

    Thank you Libby.
    Andrew the photo at the top of the article doesn't look like an Occupy site to me. It looks like a bunch of people standing on a footpath holding a big sign (their main message) and a bunch of smaller signs in the back which they want viewers to to interpret as being related. Also there's a sign written in arabic and a picture of a man who looks like an Imam. Did the athor have to travel to the middle east to find someone with an anticapitalist sign?
    The first clip, which shows how…

    Read more
  14. wilma western

    logged in via email @bigpond.com

    Occupy Melbourne, Brisbane etc did look a bit like a very pale imitation of the Arab spring and Wall Street protest which clearly had greater symbolic value. Bandwagoning seems to be a feature of modern life thanks to 24hour TV the internet etc. To be more that a one day wonder the people who feel strongly about the various issues need to get down to the more demanding stuff of either forming new organisations with ongoing programs ( anyone remember SOS during the Vietnem War ? ) or joining existing organisations with similar concerns and being actively involved in them.

    report
  15. Roxane Paczensky

    Registered Nurse

    Wilma, what you are advocating is a peicemeal response to singular issues that crop up within the current system.
    It's funny how you talk about Brisbane's Occupy in the past tense when it is continually growing and organising itself structurally and politically. If you didn't know this you are getting your news from sources that don't want you to know.
    At a time in humanity's history where 7 billion of us exist there are many fundamental problems to be addressed. The planet can't go on supporting…

    Read more
  16. Libby Mitchell

    logged in via Facebook

    Roxane I agree that this time we need big picture solutions...globally relevant, all-encompassing solutions. However unless we all join and become one world nation etc [not so impossible as it sounds either] we are all stuck with resolving issues within our own nations as a first priority and in that sense, the approach to the really big human problems does become a piecemeal response, when these are taken across our world.

    An amazing article about Iceland was sent to me today...it shows exactly what a group of people CAN do...to work themselves out of this globally fired financial mess!

    http://sacsis.org.za/site/article/728.1

    We could do well to follow the methods used in Iceland...to get sovereignty back to the people! As the article states...no wonder we have not heard about this in the media.

    report