Online pharmaceuticals: bricks, not clicks, keep us safe

Antibiotics that are laced with rat faeces and floor polish? Cough syrup that contains more than a dash of antifreeze? Antipsychotics with no pharmacologically active ingredients? Medications for heart or erectile disorders that feature floor sweepings and plaster but insufficient chemicals to the job…

8pdbb8b7-1363650775
Counterfeit drugs are an unintended consequence of globalisation. Melanie Tata

Antibiotics that are laced with rat faeces and floor polish? Cough syrup that contains more than a dash of antifreeze? Antipsychotics with no pharmacologically active ingredients? Medications for heart or erectile disorders that feature floor sweepings and plaster but insufficient chemicals to the job?

Counterfeit drugs are an unintended consequence of globalisation. And they’re one reason why Australian pharmacies matter.

Modern consumer protection began with laws restricting the sale and advertising of quack medicine, alongside those requiring increasingly rigorous qualifications for people dispensing and advising about medications. This made pharmacy a true profession rather than an occupation for vendors of pills and potions.

That emphasis on quality has served Australia well. We have not seen the disasters evident in low-touch (or no-touch) regulatory regimes, such as in India, eastern Europe and the Middle East. Pharmacy, like the pathology sector, has been a quiet performer.

That performance is worth bearing in mind as consumers shift from bricks to clicks in sourcing DVDs, clothes, wine and books. It’s become commonplace to hear forecasts about the death of the department store and dire prospects for retail property.

What’s less apparent is the willingness of some consumers to buy medications online, particularly medications from overseas. That shift is also underway and can be expected to continue. This is bad news for public health rather than just for pharmacists who have spent several years at university and are now competing with no-name entrepreneurs operating out of Kiev, Vladivostok, Tijuana or Mumbai.

There are good reasons for treasuring your pharmacist – and for encouraging her autonomy in the face of competition from the retail juggernauts named Woolies and Coles.

One reason is her expertise – she is aware of inappropriate mixes of medications. Consumers who are self-medicating through offshore suppliers are buying a commodity that isn’t tied to advice and isn’t wrapped up with an effective legal framework if something goes wrong.

If you’re shopping online from a pharmaceutical smorgasbord, the only thing that’s likely to save you from bad choices is the effectiveness of Australia Post and the Australian Customs & Border Protection Service in blocking dodgy imports.

But the officials policing the border can’t be everywhere. The government has acknowledged serious problems at the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the agency that seems to have been asleep when defective breast implants and hip joints were distributed.

The local pharmacist, on the other hand, is likely to provide cogent advice about what not to mix and match, and cautions about self-diagnosis based on Wikipedia and cyberchondria sites or about what is promoted through global direct-to-consumer marketing.

Another reason is that the conventional distribution chain for medications in Australia doesn’t have the systemic failures evident overseas. Buying your medications online from an overseas supplier may be significantly cheaper but that purchase is accompanied by significant risk.

A succession of independent scholarly studies and government reports has demonstrated serious problems with counterfeits of legitimate pharmaceuticals (estimated at around US$30bn each year) and the appalling bad quality of some generic medications. Some generics are as good as branded products; others fail basic tests of efficacy and safety.

Globalisation means that the main victims of bogus medications are sadly some of the people in greatest need: those on subsistence incomes in the developing world, who depend on genuine anti-malarials and other life-determining pharmaceuticals rather than the “blue pill” that addresses the first-world problems of middle-aged men and their partners.

But we’re not immune, and defective medications with increasing resistance among diseases such as tuberculosis and malaria, affecting Australians visiting overseas.

If you’re relying on offshore clicks, rather than visiting local bricks (or the online presence of an Australian pharmacist) what will you be getting? The answer matters if you’re buying better living through modern chemicals rather than cotton buds, jelly beans and squeaky toys.

You’re out of luck if something goes wrong and you want compensation from the supplier in Kolkata or Bucharest.

In thinking about the future of the pharmacy sector in Australia, we should recognise the significance of the “bricks and mortar” chemist, possibly even subsidising professionals to stay open longer, rather than doing our drug shopping from Amazon.com or DodgyRX.com.

This is the second article in our short series about pharmacies. Click on the link below to read the previous instalments:

Part One: Pharmacy gravy train drives up the cost of prescription drugs

Part Three: Note to pharmacists on how not to sell the morning-after pill

Part Four: Pharmacists should drop products that aren’t backed by evidence

Part Five: Why you have to show ID to buy cold and flu tablets

Join the conversation

9 Comments sorted by

  1. Sean Lamb

    Science Denier

    "Antipsychotics with no pharmacologically active ingredients? "
    You say that like its a bad thing. If recent revelations are to be believed SSRIs that lacked pharmacologically active ingredients might possibly outperform those that possess them.

    report
    1. Peter Fox

      Peter Fox is a Friend of The Conversation.

      Medical doctor

      In reply to Sean Lamb

      Sean, SSRIs are antidepressants. Antipsychotics, which are used to treat psychotic disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar), are backed by grade 1A recommendations with control of 'positive' symptoms (delusions, hallucinations) of about 70% - so very effective in comparison with many other classes of pharmaceuticals.

      So, for an antipsychotic to be unknowingly substituted with placebo, could be a disaster.

      report
    2. Sean Lamb

      Science Denier

      In reply to Peter Fox

      Thank you for the correction, although some might suggest an anti-depressive that increases rates of suicidal ideation by 80% is not doing a particularly good job.
      www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/04/briefing/2004-4065b1-10-TAB08-Hammads-Review.pdf

      I can't give an opinion about those drugs that interact with the serontonin receptor without specifically being SSRIs - such as clozapine - beyond my personal and doubtless ill-informed opinion that you would have to be crazy to take them.

      report
  2. Peter Fox

    Peter Fox is a Friend of The Conversation.

    Medical doctor

    "Modern consumer protection began with laws restricting the sale and advertising of quack medicine, alongside those requiring increasingly rigorous qualifications for people dispensing and advising about medications. This made pharmacy a true profession rather than an occupation for vendors of pills and potions"

    Bruce, I think it's a tall order to hold pharmacies as bastions of high-order scientific rigour when there's an easy dollar to be made from CAMs. You need to look no further than your local Canberran community pharmacy, where the majority of shelves contain herbal and homeopathic treatments with limited scientific basis.

    Aside from that, I agree with the rest of your argument.

    report
  3. Professor Heinz

    logged in via Twitter

    This reads as typical rent seeking by incumbents threatened by more efficient new entrants. As in countless other areas of retail, people are cottoning onto the fact that prices could be much lower than offered by typical corner shop pharmacies.

    Regulation needs to swim with the tide, not against it. People are not going to accept internet shopping in every other area but continue to put up with substandard service in pharmaceuticals. Not only does online shopping mean lower costs and wider ranges of products, it also means an end to intrusive interrogations by pharmacists, wasted time in queues, and having to fend off makeup salespeople and herbal 'medicine' placebos masquerading as the product that you're actually looking for.

    Regulation needs to provide a way to shop online for pharmaceuticals with an assurance of safety. The failure to do so will just mean the persistence of fraud, it won't prop up corner stores. The suggestion that they be subsidised is risible.

    report
    1. Ian Musgrave

      Senior lecturer in Pharmacology at University of Adelaide

      In reply to Professor Heinz

      Pharmaceuticals aren't like shoes. Getting a fake pair of Addidas shoes over the Internet has no repercussions beyond not looking cool, getting fake antipsychotics or blood pressure tablets is life threatening.

      No one has yet to find a way to regulate Internet sales, it is the nature of the Internet that it is hard to regulate in the first place. Good for freedom of speech, bad for pharmaceuticals

      report
    2. Professor Heinz

      logged in via Twitter

      In reply to Ian Musgrave

      No dispute on the former. But there are plenty of ways to regulate internet sales. All retailers have a bricks and mortar presence somewhere that can be regulated, all internet retailers lack is a physical storefront on a street. Instead they have a distribution system.

      There's no lack of ways to pass laws to restrict trade, it's a lack of ways to conduct business legitimately and efficiently, that leads to semi-legal or outright illegal workarounds popping up to meet demand. The government should be asking how best to facilitate internet trade in pharmaceuticals, not how to restrict it and prop up corner stores.

      report
  4. Geoffrey Campbell

    General Practitioner

    It is one thing to consider the big scary Internet in the global sense, peddling ineffective/illegal things, as opposed to genuine Australian businesses adopting more efficient business processes to benefit their customers. Look how some pharmacy prices tumbled when Pharmacy Direct commenced its mail service.

    report