The first real test of whether the public will accept Australia’s carbon tax will be when electricity bills start landing in peoples’ mailboxes after 1 July 2012.
The main issue is that while the carbon tax is set at $23/tonne for 2012-13, the actual carbon tax embedded in the electricity bills will vary from customer to customer. This is the inevitable result of how electricity is produced and brought to the customer’s property, as well as retailers’ buying decisions in the wholesale electricity market.
The way the carbon tax is passed on to electricity customers is likely to be more difficult to explain than the GST ten years ago.
The first issue is the impact of energy lost in the electricity networks. Let us assume that a particular customer consumes about 2000 MWh of electricity in one quarter. Some electricity is always lost in transmission and distribution networks due to the laws of physics. Let’s say we lose 8% in this case, or about 160 MWh.
Therefore, a power station will have to generate 2160 MWh to meet this customer’s requirement, and pay the carbon tax for the resulting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Who will pay for the emissions from generating this extra 160 MWh lost in the electricity networks? The customer, of course.
If one assumes that this power station emits 1 tonne of GHG to generate 1 MWh of electricity, the imputed carbon tax the customer pays after network losses will be about $24.84/tonne – 8% more than the $23. The percentage of electricity lost in networks depends on how far the customer is located from the power stations; the longer the distance, the greater the electricity lost.
The second issue is that each electricity retailer will have a portfolio of purchase contracts with different generators: coal, gas, hydro, wind. Each will have a different emissions intensity (the amount of GHG they emit when producing electricity). The overall emission intensity of the retailer’s contract portfolio will depend on its relative mix of different generator contracts, which could also vary with time as existing generator contracts expire and new ones are entered into.
Don’t forget also that some brown coal generators will be getting assistance in the form of free permits in the early years.
All these factors will affect retailers' portfolio cost for procuring power. And all will affect the embedded carbon cost in the electricity retail price to the customer.
The third issue is one of transparency, or the lack thereof. Given the highly competitive nature of the energy retail market, retailers will be loath to share their principles and methodologies for including the carbon cost in their final prices to customers.
One can hardly blame them: they also incur costs under the various additional regulations such as the Renewable Energy Target Schemes and state-based energy efficiency certificate schemes. As the proverbial meat in the carbon sandwich, electricity retail businesses face a multitude of risks. The risk premium will have to be eventually borne by the end-customers.
Some electricity retailers may choose to pass on only part of the incurred carbon costs to their customers in an attempt to defend or increase their market share. But this is likely to be a passing phenomenon until a shake-out takes place in the retail market.
Now, all the above factors are legitimate operations of the carbon tax regime and electricity market. But the fact remains that different customers could face different embedded carbon costs in their electricity bills post-July 2012.
As such, there is considerable potential for some customers to feel, albeit wrongly, that they are being over-charged. This could result in many complaints to consumer watchdogs such as the ACCC and the various ombudsmen. These initial “bad” experiences could also adversely affect their perception of the carbon tax, which the government cannot afford, as the carbon tax is likely to be an issue in the next election.
Government and retailers both face the challenge of telling household and small business customers, in simple terms, the complex process of how the $23/tonne carbon tax will be passed on in electricity bills. They should let customers know what they can do in their negotiations with retailers to minimise the impost on their bills. This communication is best done before July 2012 as part of an overall customer education campaign. Otherwise, both government and retailers may face a backlash as bills start to hit letterboxes.
Tim Scanlon
Author and Scientist
Nothing worth doing is ever easy.
I drove past a farm that was off the grid yesterday. Wind and solar. The overall use of energy will play a big role too. Gujji, drops in energy consumption, whilst good for our emissions, will they also have big impacts or tipping points for prices?
Askgerbil Now
logged in via Twitter
There are many avenues to reduce energy costs. The carbon tax provides motivation to go and look over current options. Too too numerous to describe here.
(Energy efficiency, Carbon Farming Initiative and other Clean Energy Fund programs...)
Worth more reading: Example of Rooty Hill RSL - installed its own power system, cutting its energy bill from $2.5 million a year to about $0.75 million.
Along the way, it greatly improved efficiency and slashed its CO2 emissions.
Also some good ideas in the Australian Decentralised Energy RoadMap.
(I put a summary, and a link for down-loading its report : http://blog.gerbilnow.com/2011/11/australian-decentralised-energy-roadmap.html )
David Arthur
n/a
Power prices will be a partial test of the carbon pricing scheme (please do not call the Clean Energy Future package a 'tax', it's a disguised mechanism for delivering Australia up to the tender mercies of the carbon derivative trading markets).
Power prices will also be an excellent test of Australia's fondness for coal-fired electricity. As the price of PV panels continues to fall, expect a great deal more activity on the nation's roofs.
Jonathan Maddox
Software Engineer
There is an elephant in the electricity bill, and it's not the carbon price.
http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/the-hidden-cost-of-infinite-energy-part-1/19/
Essentially : electricity network operators in Australia are pretty much obliged to deliver whatever customers demand, when they demand it. This means that the network infrastructure must exist, year-round of course, to deliver enough electricity to deliver *peak* demand, which is 50% higher on some days than average. But peak demand…
Read moreJonathan Maddox
Software Engineer
I think I neglected to say that any discussion of contemporary power bills that doesn't mention the huge cost of network upgrades is essentially misleading.
Susan Ruthenbeck
Luftmensch
Well it's clear that some states sold of their electricity infrastructure at bargain basement prices and since the sell-off, very little has been spent on improvements or maintenance. Already enough profit has been made for the companies to recoup their money and they are making a profit - still consumer bills have risen substantially.
It's not the "carbon tax"...it's the relentless drive for profit. Carbon tax just gives a reason which can be cited for further price rises.
Price put on carbon should make companies uncomfortable enough to start moving toward alternative energy generation as it becomes more viable.
Just hope that the figures are right..
Jonathan Maddox
Software Engineer
There have been massive investments in new generation and transmission infrastructure in the last two decades, however poorly the states did financially out of privatisation. And the states continue to subsidise the big generators, whether public or privately owned, for instance by selling them coal from state-owned mines at a 65% discount to the market price.
Ian Rainbow
Analytical Chemist
Following John Maddox comments it seems to me that many people will be disappointed that the compensation they receive via the government from the carbon price paid by the main generators of CO2 will not cover the full price rise most of us will see in the bill and as Gujji mentions they may feel overcharged. This could generate a huge backlash at the next election. Certainly opponents will make plenty of noise about it. The government will have to be pretty good at explaining this since we have…
Read more