Rudd as ‘swift and bold in his vision as Whitlam’ says McKew

The Rudd government came to power in 2007 with the reforming zeal of Gough Whitlam’s team more than three decades before, but was ultimately betrayed by a self-serving and brutal ALP machine according to former Labor MP Maxine McKew. Speaking with La Trobe University’s Dennis Altman ahead of the launch…

4p6yw8y2-1351388046
Maxine McKew arrives to vote in the 2010 federal election. AAP/Tracey Nearmy

The Rudd government came to power in 2007 with the reforming zeal of Gough Whitlam’s team more than three decades before, but was ultimately betrayed by a self-serving and brutal ALP machine according to former Labor MP Maxine McKew.

Speaking with La Trobe University’s Dennis Altman ahead of the launch of her political memoir Tales From The Political Trenches, McKew, who was widely respected as a journalist at the ABC before “jumping the fence” into politics, says anti-Rudd forces within the caucus used internal party polling to destabilise the sitting prime minister ahead of Julia Gillard’s move to challenge for the leadership.

McKew also addresses the current debate over misogyny in Australian politics, observing that while Tony Abbott has been forced onto the defensive by Gillard over many of his statements and actions towards women, the ALP also has an internal culture of sexism that requires remedy.


Dennis Altman: Let’s begin with the contest of ideas. You were very clear that there needed to be a new set of values and ideas brought to Australia and that you think that came with the election of Rudd in 2007. One of things that rather puzzled me as I was reading the book is virtually no reference to a couple of crucial areas that I thought you would’ve talked about: one was foreign policy, and the other was asylum seekers.

Maxine McKew: In terms of foreign affairs, I think the most critical thing, of course, that Rudd did, very early on, if you like he was as swift and as bold in his vision as was Whitlam in terms of wanting Australia to be engaged in the wider world and very quickly he identified Australia had to have a seat at the top table so what does he do? He gets Australia into the G20. He’s critical in pushing and pushing for that and I think that’s a substantial coup. Of course, the other thing he did very early on was to say “we are going to make a bid to have a seat at the Security Council”.


Dennis Altman: What was your experience, going into the Australian Parliament as an already established public figure, did you come across the sort of sexism that is now being claimed as the normal experience of women?

Maxine McKew: In terms of Labor politics, certainly the sexual politics is pretty rough and ready, you might recall in the early section of the book it was made very clear to be by Eric Roozendaal, a former state secretary of New South Wales that a safe seat could be found for me but it would be a highly conditional proposition and I remember him looking at me in Sussex street and saying “Well the question is Maxine, who would own you? Us or your hubby?” So that is not untypical. Now I didn’t fall down faint but I didn’t want to be owned by anyone.

Now you might call that patriarchal, sexist, whatever you like, but this whole question of how you navigate your way through the Labor party as a woman or indeed as a free-thinker, an independent thinker, someone who insists on playing the game a certain way, such as John Faulkner. This is the biggest issue the Labor Party is facing.


Dennis Altman: Looking back do you think it would have been better had you immediately not stepped into a parliamentary secretaryship but actually sat on the backbenches for a term and learnt the arcane processes of how the parliament works?

Maxine McKew: Yes. Absolutely. I have thought about that, but given the way things played out I had close friends pushing me to ask Rudd for a ministry. I certainly didn’t think I was up for that. But there are no prizes in politics for hiding away under a bushel. It’s all about making the mark, it’s all about, these days, being an instant success, getting immediate runs on the board, demonising your opponents. The whole contest of ideas is secondary or, I would argue these days, almost buried. That’s been part of the disappointment that I think I’ve noted and written about. But I think you’re right, I was an oddity, a political amateur up against exceptional political professionals and I think that was difficult for me to chart.


Dennis Altman Towards the end of the book you talk about, in effect, the need for Labor to regain some overall sense of what it stands for, what its values are, what it offers as an alternative to Australia. I have to say that I can’t quite tell where the difference is in what you see as Labor standing for and what Julia Gillard sees Labor standing for.

Maxine McKew Well I think the difference is that I’m not interested in sectional appeals. I’m not interested in the Labor party that only argues to smaller and smaller groups.

Now whether you look at Gough Whitlam or Bob Hawke or Paul Keating or Kevin Rudd, they were only successful because they knitted together a broad based coalition. The Labor base, the progressive middle, self-employed individuals, migrants in our major cities. We have lost that capacity to speak across the board. We are playing class warfare, we’re playing gender warfare, and we are playing the geographic divide, I mean, early this year Julia Gillard was talking about the “North Shore versus the rest”. There are actually Labor voters on the North Shore.

Join the conversation

11 Comments sorted by

  1. John Newton

    Author Journalist

    The problem with knitting together a broad- based coalition, as McKew says, means you have to sacrifice core principles, something Whitlam, to his detriment, never did.

    The problem with today's Labs is that increasingly there's only a vowel separating them from the Libs.

    report
    1. Marilyn Shepherd

      pensioner

      In reply to John Newton

      Spot on, and on some issues they are far worse.

      Bowen now wants to cut the whole nation out of the migration zone just for a couple of thousand of the world's 43 million displaced and not one lazy journalist ever bothers to ask one simple question - what if every nation did this.

      report
  2. Jack Arnold

    Director

    The major problem for the ALP (Australian Labor Party) is that the heart of Sussex Street ALP (All Lebanese People) is still poisoned by the Obeid era incumbents, despite the best efforts of John Robertson before the last NSW elections.

    Arguably, one big mistake made by the ALP was failing to recognise that a well respected former ABC journalist was a natural public face for policy, providing an experienced link between party machinations & general public voters.

    Here was an MP who had beaten a sitting Prime Minister out of both his seat & government, only the second time since federation in 1901.

    It appears that the political super egos dominating the party, both elected & unelected hacks, were unwilling or unable to recognise the significance of this great achievement and so capitalise upon this success for the benefit of both the party & Australia generally.

    report
    1. Michael Leonard Furtado

      Dr at University of Queensland

      In reply to Jack Arnold

      Interesting assessment of Maxine as 'well respected', Jack, - and I agree - in view of our current disagreement about integrating Australian Catholic schools within the public sector on another Conversation blog. When Howard, through Abbott and Pell, trumped Latham on his so-called 'hit-list' proposal, Max asked a question on Lateline suggesting that integration would have provided Latham with a much better policy outcome than the furore he aroused by drawing Pell and Jensen into an alliance against the Labor Party, which handed Howard his subsequent election victory!

      report
    2. Jack Arnold

      Director

      In reply to Michael Leonard Furtado

      Hi Michael, I have little regard for the Jensen brothers. They were both unimpressive seniors at my church fellowship.

      I wonder how the Archbishop is going to personally repay the about $200 million lost from Sydney Diocese funds by investments made during the GFC, that as a trustee he appears personally liable to repay from his stipend.

      In my view, Howard is one of the great betrayers of the Australian egalitarian society.

      report
  3. Mark O'Connor

    Author

    What a fascinating selective vision!
    Maxine claims, "the most critical thing, of course, that Rudd did, very early on, he was as swift and as bold in his vision as was Whitlam in terms of wanting Australia to be engaged in the wider world and very quickly he identified Australia had to have a seat at the top table, so what does he do? He gets Australia into the G20."

    As ideals go, that sounds pretty dull to me! I think it would have to Gough, too.

    And Maxine's memory is highly selective. She…

    Read more
    1. Jack Arnold

      Director

      In reply to Mark O'Connor

      Hi Mark. An interesting insight into the Australian xenphobia.

      it is interesting to note that Taylor's 1911 prediction about the population capacity for Australia appeared to hit the numbers exactly & on schedule as he projected.

      report
  4. Lynne Newington

    Lynne Newington is a Friend of The Conversation.

    Researcher

    I was amazed how he permitted himself to be manipulated so badly by the Catholic Bishops Conference in relation to the asylum seekers.
    And as prime minister, he never spoke out in relation to the Australian Catholic children's plight, many having commited suicide claiming in an interview with Sky News reporter David Speers, (July 17th 2008) " this is a matter for the church and I respect the internal judgement of the church".
    A Royal Commission now being called for and a Parliamentary Inquiry in Victoria.

    report
    1. Jack Arnold

      Director

      In reply to Lynne Newington

      HI Lynne. Now what Church fearing Roman Catholic believer would be brave enough to challenge the dignitaries of the Church that has an infallible leader? Read Geoffrey Robertson QC, "The Case of the Pope" to discover more details on this very urgent matter.

      report
  5. wilma western

    logged in via email @bigpond.com

    Mc Kew is good at quoting others as if they support her general thesis but bad at providing any convincing evidence of deliberate undermining by an "ambitious" and "impatient" deputy . As for sexism , she quotes a salesperson enthusing about Keating's speeches and comments "did I detect a girlish swoon"? and goes on about K Keneally giggling. Some don't regard this king of stuff as sexism, but others do .....plenty of other quibbles above.

    report