Since the launch of the massive open online courseware (MOOC) phenomenon, universities not involved in one of the three main platforms have been trying to decide how they should respond. The concept of free online courses from some of the world’s most prestigious universities like Harvard, MIT, Stanford and others has certainly proved popular with the public with literally massive enrolments. 160,000 people enrolled in Stanford University’s first MOOC on artificial intelligence given by Professors Peter Norvig and Sebastian Thrun.
Despite the massive interest generated from the initial course offerings, progress has been limited by the speed at which the current platforms, like edX, Coursera and Udacity, can expand. For the moment, these groups are taking on partners very slowly or not at all despite 120 different universities having approached edX. Coursera has just taken 17 more universities on with 180 other universities having expressed interest.
The other issue is that once Coursera and edX start taking on other partners, the competition amongst candidates is likely to be fierce with only a small number of universities being added each time.
Another option is for universities to host their own MOOCs, either on their own or in small groups. This will now be a great deal easier thanks to a small group of engineers at Stanford University. They have released an open source platform called Class2Go which is being used by Stanford itself to host two upcoming MOOCs on Computer Networking and Solar Cells, Fuel Cells and Batteries.
Developed using open source databases and software itself, Class2Go also makes use of existing services like YouTube to host video, and piazza to host online exercises. The idea is that content becomes portable and not necessarily locked into the platform. This also has the advantage of dealing with the issue of scalability. A key problem facing anyone putting on an online course is scaling access if 160,000 people all decide to watch a lecture. Class2Go’s use of YouTube to host video makes the problem YouTube’s to deal with.
The Class2Go interface captures the essential approach to online courseware that is being distilled from Coursera and Stanford’s own prior experience: short-format videos of 5 to 10 minute duration, reading material and other content, online assessments and an online forum. A simple interface allows academics to edit content and decide when that content should go live.
Using a platform like Class2Go effectively reduces the barrier to establishing a MOOC from any university. This means that we could soon start seeing courses offered in languages other than English, tailored for local cultures and content. We could also see universities potentially collaborating to provide content for basic introductory courses that otherwise would be done separately by each university.
In addition to providing a Stanford experience to anyone around the world, a stated aim of Class2Go has been actually aimed at its own students. According to Jane Manning, Manager of Production and Platforms in the office of the Vice Provost of Online Learning at Stanford University, “the ultimate aim from a Stanford perspective is to improve the experience of our enrolled Stanford students. Having a platform that lets instructors easily “flip” their classrooms”. In this way, students get the content for their courses from the online videos but use class time to do other activities.
The concern over differentiating an on-campus experience that is paid for, from an online course that is free, has been expressed by many when considering offering MOOCs. Although you can indeed “flip” a classroom, it is still dependent on the students attending. One of the dangers is that if it is made too easy for them to do the course entirely online, then that is what they will choose to do.
At that point, it may prove harder to justify charging the same fees unless the on-campus experience is significantly enhanced.
Linus Bowden
management consultant
There is no doubt that the nasayers aout these online degrees will be proven wrong. But I am not persuaded they are a threat to the rivers of gold from elite on-campus college degrees. Even though the fees are an inredible $40-50,000 per year, my hunch is that most students are not paying for the classroom education, but for the plutocratic grooming. This grooming experience could never be matched by their online offerings. I also think that the experience of living in a real academic setting with…
Read moreColin McIvor
Knowledge Management Aficiando
David - great article - though I seem to remember that there is a "virtual" university being set up in Germany based on online video tutorials and assessments - at the end of the day people don't get a degree but they do get a virtual qualification that is recognised. Dont know if you have seen this - but agree a lot of the universities have to get away from the lecturing to an auditorium of 100 spellbound students to releasing great content to 100,000 students which requires a re-education of our academic profession - the closest i could think of is the podcasts and itunes uni stuff coming out of Columbia Unviersity http://www.twiv.tv/ twiv - this week in virology where they have a podcast and then links to all the lectures the two profs who do the podcast give - great stuff
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Gavin Moodie
Principal Policy Adviser
This article is factually wrong: Coursera added 17 new universities on 19 September 2012.
I don't know whether attrition matters to MOOCs, but if it does, they are in deep trouble. Nelson (2012) calculated Stanford’s artificial intelligence subject's retention rate to be 12.5% and Kolowich (2012) calculated edX’s circuits & electronics’ retention rate as 5.3% and its pass rate as 4.5%.
Kolowich, Steve (2012) The MOOC survivors, Inside Higher Ed, 12 September, retrieved 12 September 2012 from
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/09/12/edx-explores-demographics-most-persistent-mooc-students
Nelson, Robert (2012) Comment on Marginson, Simon (2012) Online open education: yes, this is the game changer, the Conversation, 16 August 2012, retrieved 16 August 2012 from
http://theconversation.edu.au/online-open-education-yes-this-is-the-game-changer-8078#comment_63173
David Glance
Director, Centre for Software Practice at University of Western Australia
Hi Gavin,
Yes - the announcement of the 17 universities came out *after* I posted the article - I have updated it to reflect that. Regarding the retention rate - even 1% would represent more people having completed the course than the on campus version. It also does not meant that they didn't watch all of the videos or get something out of the course.
Obviously this is not deterring all of the universities - including the University of Melbourne that are moving to put these courses on