More Australian universities are now in the top 100 ranked universities in the world, according to the Academic Ranking of World Universities released today.
Five Australian universities – University of Melbourne, the Australian National University (ANU), University of Queensland (UQ), University of Sydney, and the University of Western Australia (UWA) – all made it into the top 100, compared with four last year.
Melbourne University topped the list of Australian universities. It was ranked 57, up three places from last year. ANU came a close second to Melbourne at 64 (up 6 places), while UWA made it into the top 100 for the first time at 97.
American and British universities still dominated the top 10 with Harvard University coming in at number one. Chinese universities are rising in the rankings – in 2005 China had only 8 universities in the top 500 but this year has 28.
The annual rankings are based on a number of indicators including research citations, the number of articles published and Nobel Prize winning staff or alumni.
Melbourne University’s Professor of Higher Education Simon Marginson said Australia’s improved result was likely a delayed response to extra funding and policy changes made three or four years ago, which coincided with the peak of the international student market in Australia.
Australia’s moves up the rankings were “quite significant” Marginson said, particularly the entry of UWA into the top 100. UWA’s Life Sciences subject was also the highest ranked of any discipline in Australia. But he warned these gains could stagnate:
“Because the international [student] market is headed down and with no more increases in government funding in the pipeline, we’ll be struggling to hold our current position over the next two, to three years … This could be the peak.”
UWA Vice-Chancellor Paul Johnson said his university’s improvement was the result of a long-term investment strategy, started under his predecessor Professor Alan Robson.
“[Olympic] athletes don’t get up one day and say ‘I think I’ll try and win an Olympic medal’. They have a plan, their coaches have a plan, they train very hard to get there… It’s the same for universities,” Professor Johnson said.
But he noted Australian universities' successes were much less likely to attract public attention:
“Winning the hundred metres is like getting an article published in Nature … but 9.6 seconds on the running track is great TV; four years work in a laboratory by a team of 28 researchers is not.”
Melbourne University Provost Professor Margaret Sheil welcomed her university’s top position in the rankings. She said it was gratifying to “be recognised among the world’s greatest universities.”
Monash University Vice-Chancellor Ed Byrne said he was proud of the improvement Monash had made – the university moved up 22 places from last year’s rankings. His staff would continue to “strive to be the best for our students and our staff,” he said.
Universities Australia’s chief executive Belinda Robinson described the sector’s performance as “outstanding”.
“All Australians should be very proud that our universities continue to improve their standing among the best in the world.”
Su-Lin Tan
logged in via Twitter
"The annual rankings are based on a number of indicators including research citations, the number of articles published and Nobel Prize winning staff or alumni."
But what about how well run the university is? What about student satisfaction with the professionalism of staff? or teaching ability? or how well run are university internal processes?
This measure is based on the universities' image and effectiveness of their PR teams. What about students input? Isn't that far more important?
Mister Anderson
Student
So true. I've had so many lecturers that are paramount in their field but can't hold a normal conversation let alone teach a class room full of students. It's like they are talking in tongues at times. Where's the praise and support for academics whose research suffers from caring too much about their students and dedicating 'too much' time to their education.
Anthony Nolan
Ruminant
"“All Australians should be very proud that our universities continue to improve their standing among the best in the world.”"
Groan.
Are the script writers from 'Yes Minister' designing the ranking system? My last year of employment at an Australian university obliged me to witness and participate in thirteen overseas students, ones I had failed in the final assessment for a mass introduction to sociology (word salad essays), being dragged over the line for a pass on the basis that if they failed this year they wouldn't be back next. Also, failing international students would be likely to reduce future enrollments - who wants to attend a university where you're expected to speak, read and write the language the courses are taught in?
Everyone knows this. Don't take us for mugs.
Gary Dean Brisneyland
Urban Design Student
I'm so confused. “All Australians should be very proud that our universities continue to improve their standing among the best in the world.” Queensland University of Technology (QUT) isn't even on the 500 list from what I can see. Last year it was 294 from memory. Shouldn't that spark a Parliamentary Enquiry??
Gavin Moodie
Principal Policy Adviser
QUT has never been in Shanghai Jiao Tong University’s academic ranking of world universities, which is the most authoritative but narrowest of the several university league tables published. You're probably thinking of another league table.
Wally Week
Bicycle Engineer
I am very sceptical of these rankings, having worked at an Australian university ranked within the top 100 and also at an European university that is not even within the top 400. What I found in the first case was a lot of questionable manipulation in order to make points at the expense of honesty and actual quality. I was always upset by seeing some undeserving students getting their PhD degrees when they should not (the particular examination system in Australia makes this much easier than in most places), or scaling class marks to get a good average. Also, the pressure with research staff having to publish in top journals even when the research environment (quality of staff, resources) was at a much lower level was quite stressful. On the contrary, I did not witness much of all this while working at the second, much less reputable university. So it makes me wonder about what these rankings really mean in some cases.