Forecasting commodity prices is like buying a second hand car. Only the car’s previous owner and perhaps the dealer really know what the car is actually like. In contrast you, the buyer, are an outsider with very limited insight and can only judge the car’s true value by what you see in the car yard. Second hand cars, and iron ore, are classic cases of asymmetric information at work, pioneered by George Akelof’s 1970 study on the market for lemons.
In 2008 BHP Billiton grew tired of the practice of selling iron ore to China at an annually negotiated and hard fought fixed price of around $120 per tonne only to see its competitors in India selling iron ore in the spot market at prices of $300 per tonne.
The company was selling iron ore directly to many of the large and some smaller steel makers in China at annually agreed benchmark prices, only to see them sell it on to other producers at much higher spot prices. Steel producers could now make more money from trading iron ore than making steel. Many smaller steel producers simply shut down their blast furnaces, traded iron ore and retreated to the local tea house to watch the money rolling in.
Iron ore was one of the last of the heavily traded commodities that could not be readily bought and sold by intermediaries. So BHP Billiton got serious. BHP Billiton jump-started the market started by donating around two million tonnes of iron ore to form a spot market to entice a limited number of “informed” (sanctioned) intermediaries (not speculators) to provide liquidity and establish a floating price index against which their contracts could be priced.
The dominant iron ore producers desire a floating price index for iron ore that reflects global steel demand. But they also want to sell iron ore directly to steel producers, and avoid pesky brokers, traders and speculators in between. These intermediaries are regarded by the producers as market parasites latching on to their hugger-mugger marketplace to undercut prices and destroy value.
A floating index is only effective if such intermediaries are present and are freely allowed to trade. Traded volumes of iron ore barely reach 80% of the total global volume of iron ore produced. This is better than zero, as it was prior to 2008. But compared with copper and other metals, whose traded volumes in futures and other derivatives often exceed 100 times their production volume, the iron ore market is stale. The iron ore price index relies upon buyers and sellers to report their transactions to a data compiler, and only a few transactions are ever reported. This is unlikely to improve.
An efficient market is regarded as one where prices reflect prevailing demand and supply conditions. There will naturally be price volatility. Prices for copper or bananas are generally seen as the squiggly line of a random walk and contain inherent volatility, with some price jumps. In contrast, iron ore prices exhibit a volatility all of their own and are capricious in a different way. Instead of a large number of minor price changes with a few large price jumps reflective of normal market activity, iron ore prices are not continuous and mostly only jump up or down. Sometimes the prices changes are quite extreme, taking the market by surprise even though this type of behaviour is expected in a market with limited trades.
This is largely a function of the commodity itself. Iron ore is sold in large parcels to buyers and supply interruptions can trigger price changes as demand spikes. But critically, the fact that the dominant producers have elbowed speculators out of the market, while reluctantly acknowledging their necessity to maintain market liquidity, has created a volatile iron ore price index of questionable relevance to market observers.
This does two things. First, forecasting iron ore prices becomes tricky. Most of the forecasts will be wildly wrong because of the jumpy and largely opaque nature of how the price series is generated. And second, because forecasts are difficult, the Federal Treasurer and his Treasury have no idea how much tax revenue is due to them from iron ore sales, either through normal corporate tax receipts or via the MMRT because the forecasts will be wrong.
Squeezing speculators from the iron ore market has allowed the dominant producers to maintain market secrecy under the guise of price discovery. Until speculators penetrate the iron ore trade, forecasting prices in the market for lemons (and iron ore) will remain a mystery.
Robert McDougall
Small Business Owner
"compared with copper and other metals, whose traded volumes in futures and other derivatives often exceed 100 times their production volume"
how the #%^! does this happen?
Jason West
Associate Professor, Griffith Business School at Griffith University
Traders can bet on the future price of copper without actually ever coming into contact with it. Around 95 percent of all trades are closed out before the need to take delivery is required. Same with options - you can bet on the price of copper, without ever needing to take delivery of it. The contracts are often cash-settled. More market participants means greater market liquidity. This is how futures work. In contrast when there are only 3 or 4 sellers and 30 or so buyers (like iron ore), and no real futures or options market, the market is not very liquid.
Robert McDougall
Small Business Owner
So in essence, everyone is having a gamble, with very little actual connection to the commodity.
Why the need for greater market liquidity? Not knowing much about it, the futures and options market seems just a little bit risky and divorced from any actual thing being produced.
Jason West
Associate Professor, Griffith Business School at Griffith University
Yep you are basically right. Anyone can trade commodity futures. But the addition of more and more participants is intended to add more information to the market, increasing its efficiency and transparency. Very risky indeed, and if you are an 'uninformed investor' you will get smashed by those who have a direct interest in the commodity. But there are a lot of players who have an interest in the base metals, so they are quite liquid. Iron ore not so.
If this didn't happen, and there were no speculators, there would be very little trading of commodities, stocks, bonds, FX, etc.It would be like trading and trying to make money in the stodgy old market for holiday flats in Noosa.
Robert McDougall
Small Business Owner
Thanks Jason. Though from what I have seen of speculators, the whole world could do without them.
Without being religous, it kinda reeks of the reason why Be-Jeses tossed the money changers out of the temple and why interest (aka usury) is called a sin.
Nothing is created, only made more expensive, no real wealth, just more imaginary money skimmed from the physical world economy.
Dale Bloom
Analyst
This is probably one of the scariest articles to appear on The Conversation.
In a world filled with debt, Australia’s economy has become totally dependant on iron ore and coal prices, and if coal prices were to drop to year 2000 levels, Australia would be totally bankrupt, and could be placed in the same basket as Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain, and numerous other countries now heavily in debt.
We now find iron ore prices are being manipulated by speculators.
Added to this is also the strong possibility that China is “cooking the books”, as its reported exports to other countries no longer seem to match the reported imports by the other countries.
So everything appears to be dependant on speculators, and whether or not China is being honest when stating its exports are again increasing.
Mark Harrigan
Dr
Actually, Futures trading was born in Feudal Japan with the Samurai. It was created to meet the needs of the Samurai who were often settled in rice and as a result of bad harvest needed a way to guarantee payment.
It was also a way to lock in a price. The traded futures market in rice back then was also several times the physical market.
Today futures (and options) are still used for that purpose. It is true there are traders who speculate using futures and options - but there are people…
Read moreGarry Baker
resarcher
The really scary part is our second rate country managers(politicians) have steered Australia into a bleak future if the price of rocks declines. Indeed, we now hold the status of being a 'one trick pony' under their so-called good management. Rock sellers, up to our eyebrows in debt, with no hope of paying it if rock sales decline. As a substitute for the zero sum their MMRT will actually deliver, Canberra's attention has turned to selling other hard assets to rake in some much needed cash to…
Read moreReinhard Dekter
logged in via Facebook
I suppose this has resulted from the erroneous attack on speculators. As the article highlights they serve a vital role in stabilising the price, by buying when other demand is low and selling when other demand is high. This smoothing action is most effective when the individual speculator is most correct in his forecasts and therefore makes the best profit. Thus when the speculator profits everyone else also gains from a stabilised price which makes production decisions easier and therefore cheaper.