Aussies vs mozzies: a user’s guide to repellents

Mosquito-borne disease is a serious concern, with millions of people worldwide impacted by pathogens spread by these blood-sucking insects. In Australia, there are more than 5,000 cases of human illness caused by the mosquito-borne Ross River virus and Barmah Forest virus every year. When mosquitoes…

28b75mnv-1355887185
Not all mosquito repellents are equal. Flickr/sachman75

Mosquito-borne disease is a serious concern, with millions of people worldwide impacted by pathogens spread by these blood-sucking insects. In Australia, there are more than 5,000 cases of human illness caused by the mosquito-borne Ross River virus and Barmah Forest virus every year.

When mosquitoes bite, they inject saliva into the skin. Our bodies react to this mozzie spit, causing a skin irritation. The severity of the “itchy bite” varies from person to person and, in some cases, severe allergic reactions can occur.

Mosquito control programs can reduce the rates of human disease but the first line of defence remains personal protection measures: avoiding known mosquito habitats (such as wetlands) and peak biting times (dusk), wearing protective clothing (often treated with insecticides) and using bed nets and insect repellents.

But not all mosquito repellents are equal. There are over 60 individual repellent formulations currently registered including aerosols, creams, lotions, pump sprays, wipes, wrist bands and sticks. Despite this diversity of products, there are only a handful of active ingredients, the most common of which are DEET (diethyltoluamide) and Picaridin.

All topical insect repellents sold in Australia must be registered with the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). The APVMA assess products for their efficacy and safety. This also means the label must display the active ingredients and their concentration.

Picaridin is often favoured because it’s as effective as DEET but doesn’t smell. Frlick/gfpeck

Active ingredients

DEET has been shown to be effective at preventing bites from a wide range of pest mosquitoes. It’s considered the gold standard in mosquito repellents. But there is still not unanimous agreement on how DEET works. While it’s generally thought to prevent bites by inhibiting the host seeking stimuli, there is also some evidence that the mosquitoes smell, and are repelled, by DEET.

Picaridin works just as well as DEET and is generally considered to be a more pleasant product to use as it is odourless.

There is some resistance to the use of these chemical repellents because they’re unpleasant to use, are thought to damage clothing or belongings or are perceived to pose adverse health effects. But despite the widespread use of DEET, and increasingly picaridin, there are very few serious adverse reactions reported. As such, the two products have been endorsed by health authorities internationally as a safe way to avoid mosquito bites.

Formulations

There is often confusion about how the concentration of a repellent determines the level of protection: the concentration of a repellent relates to the duration of protection, not the amount of mosquitoes that are kept at bay.

Repellents containing DEET at concentrations of 80% or 10%, for example, will both protect against mosquito bites for about two hours. While the protection provided by the 10% formulation may stop after a few hours, the 80% formulation will continue to provide protection for over ten hours.

When choosing a repellent, it’s worth keeping in mind just how long you’ll need to protect yourself. For a quick trip to the park, a low-concentration repellent will do the trick. But if you’re off on a major bush walk or fishing trip, a higher concentration repellent will be required. Alternatively, you’ll need to reapply a lower concentration repellent more frequently.

The concentration of a repellent relates to the duration of protection, not the amount of mosquitoes that are kept at bay. Flickr/arnybo

So does formulation matter?

Probably not. The choice of active ingredient is really the most important decision. The choice of formulation is probably best guided by the ease of application. Sprays are generally most effective for arms and legs while creams and wipes are good for the face.

For complete protection, the entire surface of exposed skin must be covered. For this reason, it is probably best to apply repellent to your hands first, and then rub into exposed skin. A spray “here and there” won’t offer protection. Spraying repellent on clothes and/or belongings won’t help either.

What about ‘natural’ repellents?

Products derived from plants are often considered a safer alternative to the chemical products such as DEET and picaridin. Homemade concoctions of essential oils, particularly Eucalyptus and Melaleuca oils, are often promoted as suitable repellents.

First, it’s important to note that these products have the potential to cause skin reaction.

Second, studies have shown that essential oils provide only limited protection from biting mosquitoes. Registered commercial products that contain botanical extracts offer some protection but will need to be reapplied far more frequently than even the low concentration DEET- or picaridin-based repellents.

A spray ‘here and there’ won’t offer protection. Cameron Webb

Despite its popularity, citronella has repeatedly been shown to be less effective than DEET.

The Australian native plant Corymbia citriodora (lemon-scented Gum) plant sits in an interesting position among botanical repellents. While the essential oil from this plant doesn’t demonstrate substantial repellent activity, the by-product of the hydrodistillation process has been shown to be a very effective repellent. The active ingredient is p-menthane-3, 8-diol (PMD). In Australia, PMD is listed as, “Oil of Lemon Eucalyptus being acid modified extract of lemon eucalyptus (Corymbia citriodora)”.

Although patches or plastic wrist bands are registered as repellents by APVMA, these only offer very limited and localised protection (generally only immediately around the product, if at all).

Ultrasonic repellents have been sold in many forms for many years. The most recent incarnation is smartphone apps. The failure of sound to repel mosquitoes has been shown time and time again. They simply don’t work.

What’s best?

A group of experts recently reviewed the benefits of a range of strategies, from insecticides to taking vitamin B supplements.

Their conclusion? As well as insecticide-treated bed nets and clothing, topical insect repellents provide the best protection. DEET- and picaridin-based repellents are a cheap, safe and effective way to prevent mosquito-borne disease.

Join the conversation

18 Comments sorted by

  1. Mat Hardy

    Lecturer in Middle East Studies at Deakin University

    "Although patches or plastic wrist bands are registered as repellents by APVMA, these only offer very limited and localised protection (generally only immediately around the product, if at all)."

    Hooray! I was going to buy some of these the other day and decided I didn't know if they were worth the price. I love it when I get things right. Even by accident!

    Now, can anyone tell me if those little piezo-electric clicker things that are supposed to relieve bite itchiness actually work?

    report
    1. Grendelus Malleolus

      Senior Nerd

      In reply to Mat Hardy

      "Now, can anyone tell me if those little piezo-electric clicker things that are supposed to relieve bite itchiness actually work?"

      Prevention, as always is better than the cure - Like Michael I could not find evidence to support the use of Piezo - a nice hypothesis, and some studies have been done around the safety of the device but nothing published that I could see that indicated effectiveness. I suspect that like scratching, some external stimulus to the site of the bite delivers some temporary relief.

      report
  2. Stiofán Mac Suibhne

    Contrarian / Epistemologist

    I am considering buying one of those propane gas devices that lures Mosquitos and then kills them. I wonder if the experts have any views on their use?

    The cost upwards of $800. My garden is unusable due to Mosquitos. I don't want to slather on DEET to take the rubbish out!

    report
  3. Pera Lozac

    Heat management assistant

    Just to add to the whole picture - from Wiki:

    "DEET has been found to inhibit the activity of a central nervous system enzyme, acetylcholinesterase, in both insects and mammals.[19] This enzyme is involved in the hydrolysis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, thus playing a role in the function of the neurons which control muscles. Because of this property, many insecticides are used to block acetylcholinesterase, which leads to an excessive accumulation of acetylcholine at the synaptic cleft, causing neuromuscular paralysis and death by asphyxiation.[20] DEET is commonly used in combination with insecticides and has the capacity to strengthen the toxicity of carbamates,[21] a class of insecticides known to block acetylcholinesterase. These findings bring evidence that, besides having known toxic effects on the olfactory system, DEET also acts on the brain of insects, and that its toxicity is strengthened in combination with other insecticides."

    report
    1. Sue Ieraci

      Public hospital clinician

      In reply to Pera Lozac

      Pera Lozac - carbamates are agricultural insecticides, with similar effects to organophosphates.

      This article is about the use of DEET as a single active ingredient in personal insect repellants. In this context, it is never combined with insecticides, and certainly never with carbamates.

      report
  4. Keren Lavelle

    freelance journalist

    I have used a lemon-scented gum insect repellent, Mosiguard, which was recommended by a travel medicine service via my GP (and based on the scientific evidence). It was a hassle to purchase at the time, only available from certain travel medicine practices, but is now available via Mosiguard's website www.mosiguard.com.au
    I notice that a UK manufacturer is also producing a lemon scented gum repellent.

    report
    1. Sue Ieraci

      Public hospital clinician

      In reply to Keren Lavelle

      The Mosiguard website provides a link to this review article:

      http://www.mosiguard.com.au/downloads/Expert%20Review%20of%20the%20Evidence%20Base%20for%20Arthropod%20Bite%20Avoidance.pdf

      This paper clearly describes DEET as the most effective topical repellant, with the strongest evidence for efficacy. Deet on wristbands had the lowest level of efficacy. Citronella was less effective, and essential oils less again (including the type of eucalyptus oil present in "Mosiguard".

      This is an excellent reference for the efficacy evidence of the various types of insect control and repellants.

      report
    2. Keren Lavelle

      freelance journalist

      In reply to Sue Ieraci

      I'm not sure about that, Sue, the paper you referenced at the link says "Studies carried out both in the laboratory and the field using rigorous methodology have shown PMD to be a repellent of equal efficacy and longevity as deet."

      report
  5. Robin Bell

    Research Academic Public Health, at University of Newcastle

    Living in the Lower Hunter of NSW, not too far from the Hexam wetlands, mossies are a constant part of any outdoor event.
    The risks associated with long term use of repellants is often on my mind. Relying on public reporting of adverse reactions is problematic. Use of these chemicals is not effectively monitored by Public Health authorities, and adverse events are rarely reported even when causal links are suspected. While Public Health authorities generally recommend that DEET and other repellants are safe to use, DEET has anti-acetylcholinesterase activity in insects and mammals, and has been linked to deaths and fitting consistant with similar more toxic compounds.
    How systematic are the investigations into repellant toxicity? Are there clinical trials? Or is it a matter of no evidence of toxicity due to no evidence generally!

    report
  6. Sue Ieraci

    Public hospital clinician

    Thanks for the article, Cameron.

    As a person who both appears to attract mozzies and also mounts an allergic response to them which can last weeks, I've found DEET products to be a life-saver.

    The other thing to add is that, once bitten, one can mitigate the allergic response (big itchy lump that lasts days to weeks) with topical steroid cream (if there is no contraindication to its use) and/or oral antihistamines.

    People like me who spend summer covered in bites can benefit from this dual approach - an effective repellant (especially in early evening) and post-bite anti-allergic reaction treatment.

    report
  7. Ryan Farquharson

    Research Officer

    So where does 'smoke' fit in to this? Lighting up my chimenea seems to keep the mozzies well away. I also remember a scene in '10 canoes' where smoke was used overnight to keep the mozzies off.

    report
    1. Grendelus Malleolus

      Senior Nerd

      In reply to Ryan Farquharson

      I would propose a couple of hypotheses - first being that the smoke plume may obscure other odour plumes that the mosquito may otherwise follow so that being downwind from smoke (and effectively within the plume) may hide a person from detection by the mosquito.

      The second possibility is that mosquitos, like other animals, are averse to fire - and where there is smoke...

      report
  8. Ian Flynn

    High School Teacher

    @Sue Leracie: I'm certainly no expert in this topic so feel free to contradict me with better information, but where it says "DEET has been found to inhibit the activity of a central nervous system enzyme, acetylcholinesterase, in both insects and mammals." , doesn't that mean it's affecting both the insects AND us? So even when DEET is only being used as a single active ingredient in personal repellants, not in combination with insecticides, it's still causing some level of harm in humans? I'd love…

    Read more
    1. Sue Ieraci

      Public hospital clinician

      In reply to Ian Flynn

      Ian Flynn - if you go to the actual reference paper for that assertion, you will find this intro:

      "N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) remains the gold standard for insect repellents. About 200 million people use it every year and over 8 billion doses have been applied over the past 50 years. Despite the widespread and increased interest in the use of deet in public health programmes, controversies remain concerning both the identification of its target sites at the olfactory system and its mechanism of toxicity in insects, mammals and humans. Here, we investigated the molecular target site for deet and the consequences of its interactions with carbamate insecticides on the cholinergic system."

      As is mostly the case, toxicity depends on both dose and interactions. Does that help?

      report
  9. Comment removed by moderator.

    1. Steve Davis

      Brian Surgeon

      In reply to sdfkw hiuhsdfi

      Now there's someone who shouldn't use mozzie repellent and with a little luck will be sucked dry...

      report