Plain packing has been a reality for Big Tobacco in Australia for three months now; New Zealand announced last week it will follow suit; and at least four other nations, including India, are also considering plain packs. So just how bad do things look for the tobacco industry?
The answer here depends on where you are talking about.
Let’s take Australia first. Thirty-five years ago when I started my career, around 45% of men and 30% of women smoked. Today 16.4% of men and 13.9% of women smoke daily. Every survey in the past 20 years has seen smoking rates heading south.
Teenage smoking rates are also at an all-time low: in 1996, 28% of 17-year-old boys smoked, and 34% of girls. Today it’s 16% and 13%. And that’s been achieved without “targeting” teenagers, which evidence suggests is about the worst thing you can do. Teenagers smoking has fallen away dramatically by stealth: they see the quit campaigns targeted at their smoking parents, have grown up since 1992 with a total ban on tobacco advertising and sponsorship, and live in a society where smoking has become thoroughly denormalised.
But what about the smokers who remain? Are they a “hard core” of thoroughly addicted smokers who either can’t or don’t want to quit?
In fact, they’re anything but. It’s not just the light smokers who have quit: many very heavy smokers have too, and if it was mostly only heavy smokers left smoking, average daily consumption would be rising, which it’s not.

A 2002 study of 8,000 smokers from four countries, including Australia, found the experience of regret at having started smoking was nearly universal: 90% of smokers agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, “If you had to do it over again, you would not have started smoking". I’ve never met a smoker who lived in hope that their own children would take up smoking, even as adults.
So with 15.1% of Australians smoking daily today, that leaves just 1.5% who smoke and who have no regrets. For every 200 people, just three will be smokers who are happy about it.
Every year about 40% of smokers make a serious quit attempt. Smokers around the world shell out $US1.8 billion on quit treatments. They are not doing this to make a charitable donation to the pharmaceutical industry. They smoke, desperately wish they didn’t and want to stop. Can there be any product in the history of commerce where the customer base feels so bad about consuming it?
Many studies have shown that large proportions of smokers welcome restrictions on where they can smoke, tax rises, and ghoulish pack warnings. They know these things help them regulate their own smoking. Only one in ten smokers now smoke inside their own homes and 58% of Victorian smokers believe that the sale of cigarettes should eventually be banned.
But what about other parts of the world?
This morning I reviewed a yet-to-be-published study from a rural tobacco-growing province in China where 89% of illiterate males smoke. Big Tobacco’s planners eye their world maps and salivate over large, poorly educated populations, ideally with corrupt officials.
Tobacco websites touchingly now “agree” that smoking causes health problems, and they cynically promote new reduced harm products, spinning the ever-so-responsible line that they hope that smokers will switch to these less risky products.

All the while they continue to virulently oppose any policy that threatens to actually reduce smoking. Their dream is of “dual use” where as many people smoke as much as they can, whenever they can, while using smokeless nicotine products during the hours or settings where smoking is banned, to keep blood-nicotine levels nice and high.
The good news is that 176 nations have have now ratified the legally binding World Health Organisation’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, obligating them to introduce the sort of policies we have had in Australia for decades. The only nations which haven’t are tobacco states such as Malawi, Zimbabwe, Haiti, Cuba and the tobacco industry paradise of Indonesia, where western rock and pop acts still assist tobacco transnationals to promote smoking at massive music festivals.
Today’s epidemic of tobacco caused disease started about 120 years ago with the invention of the safety match, the mechanisation of cigarette manufacturing, the efforts of the advertising industry and the tobacco industry’s addiction chemists. In many nations the death toll is now on the wane. But for the world’s largest and poorest nations, the worst is yet to come.
Lenard Smith
Student
Most electronic cigarette users I have interviewed have completely come off tobacco smoke. If tobacco giants plan on surving on "dual use", then they have another thing coming. There are plenty of electronic cigarette and nicotine-liquid companies that are creeping up, and those companies don't sell tobacco at all. This is why tobacco companies are beginning to buy ecog companies. The health improvement of people who have off tobacco smoke has been remarkable. This is why anti-smoking groups such as ASH UK are beginning to get behind them.
What you have to remember is that the Big Tobacco giants came into the electronic cigarette game way too late. Their products (the ones that look like cigarettes) are considered by most enthusiastic ecig users to be quite inferior. Tobacco comapnies see electronic cigarettes as a major threat, and many market experts have predicted electronic cigarette use will over take conventional cigarettes in only a short time.
Simon Chapman
Professor of Public Health at University of Sydney
Lenard, please give us a link to even one "market expert" (as distinct from someone trying to hype it all who sells eigs or who s a paid consultant) who has said eigs will overtake cigarettes in a short time.
Lenard Smith
Student
Well, personally I think paid consultants are probably the most reliable for this matter. They're the one's informing Big Tobacco of the threat and to get in on the market before it truly is too late.
In any case, Is Bonnie Herzog from Wells Fargo a credible source?
http://business.time.com/2013/01/08/can-electronic-cigarettes-challenge-big-tobacco/
Please let me know if I should be ignoring her word.
Simon Chapman
Professor of Public Health at University of Sydney
Bonnie Herzog is a long time analyst, so her views are not to be dismissed. But I've seen no one else talk like that. Here what the CEO of RJR (third largest tobacco company in the world) said to stockholders last November: "We have a little mantra inside of the company that we use, which we call the 80-90-90… We spend about 80 percent of our resources in the combustible space. The combustible space is still 80 percent, 80-plus percent of our operating income. We spend the majority of our resources…
Read moreBill Budd
Lecturer, Researcher
The Reynolds CEO seems a little like a dinosaur gazing up at the cretacean sky wondering what that bright and shiny object looming towards it was. The non 'combustible' category he refers to does not primarily relate to electronic cigarettes but more likely the various forms of smokeless or 'safe' cigarettes currently being trialled by tobacco companies, most of which have been rather poorly received by tobacco smokers. The ‘dual-use dream’ is probably a figment of an overactive imagination I suspect…
Read moreKevin Bain
Teacher
Simon, the tobacco companies claimed that plain packaging will cause smokers to elevate prices over non-price brand "features", leading to price competition and higher consumption. Any signs of this yet?
Your comments about Indonesia as the smokers' paradise are well taken, with a price of 12000 Rupiah (AUD 1.20) for a 20 pack of Marlboro Reds. But it's not only sponsoring every music and cultural event, but also education, disaster relief and political funding - anything which builds a constituency of support for their products. ITC in India has made this a fine art, extending their social and economic support to every social group that moves, as well as being a flag-bearer for Triple Bottom Line sustainable business. A lot of this is at the grassroots, well-resourced and professionally done - hard to see how the influence of these companies can be rolled back.
Simon Chapman
Professor of Public Health at University of Sydney
It's all being monitored Kevin -- but will keep the powder dry for now
Jeff Haddrick
field manager
The real bottom line is that 3.5 million Australians are in harms way and over 3 million of them don’t want to be there, but Australian parliamentarians are content to leave them there. The Australian medical establishment is complicit in that state of affairs.
Read more7 years ago, the survey “Is government action out-of-step with public opinion on tobacco control” showed that a majority of people were in favour of planning an end game on tobacco. The hearts and minds war had basically been won at that…
Sue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
"The Australian medical establishment is complicit in that state of affairs."
In what way, Jeff Haddrick? (Even assuming that there is such a thing as the "Australian medical establishment".)
Jeff Haddrick
field manager
In reply to Sue: 'They' (take your pick- Depts of Health, public health officials, the AMA) are complicit by their silence.
Read moreFor as it says in the abstract of that survey "Implications: Continued advocacy campaigns are required to align government tobacco control agenda more closely with public preferences."
100,000h have died since then and it is only in the last year that two people in articles on these pages have touched on the societal ethical aspect of this issue.(Craig Dalton - Conjoint Senior…