The latest announcements about boat-people involved heading further down the wrong track: a track marked out by the Howard government for political reasons, and sold to the public using dishonest rhetoric which the Coalition continues to peddle. The result is that we are spending vast amounts of money on indefinite mandatory detention (at least $1 billion per year, but increasing as we spin them off to more remote, more expensive, places).
The cost of indefinite detention has to be clearly recognised. Detention on-shore costs around $150,000 per person per year. It costs about $350,000 per person per year to hold them off-shore. But the cost goes further. Since most boat people are ultimately recognised as refugees, and are accepted into the community, they come into the community profoundly damaged by their detention experience and (in some cases no doubt) resentful rather than grateful. They are less able to contribute fully to the Australian community because of the damage we inflict on them. This is a profound irony, given that boat people show great courage and initiative by getting here the way they do. In principle, they are just the sort of people we should want here.
As I argued in my earlier piece, the number of boat people who get here is small, by any measure. This year we might get 20,000 boat-people arriving, but it is likely to be fewer. Just recently Greece – poor, bankrupt Greece – volunteered to resettle 20,000 Syrian refugees. If Greece can manage 20,000 refugees in one hit, I dare say Australia can cope with 20,000 in a year. Incidentally, the population of Greece is about the same as Australia’s.
If things keep going as they are, we will lock asylum seekers up, ship them off to Nauru, or condemn them to a life in the shadows as a new underclass prevented from working for five years regardless of their true status as refugees. To put this in perspective, each of these responses involves Australia in breaches of various international human rights standards but more importantly it sits badly with our vision of ourselves as a generous, decent nation.
There is an alternative.
If I could re-design the system, it would look something like this.
First, boat arrivals would be detained initially for one month, for preliminary health and security checks, subject to extension if a court was persuaded that a particular individual should be detained longer.
Second, after initial detention, refugees would be released into the community, with the right to work and access Centrelink and Medicare benefits. Even if none of them got a job, this would still be cheaper than keeping them locked up.
Third, refugees would be released into the community on terms calculated to make sure they remained available for the balance of their visa processing.
Fourth, during the time their visa applications were being processed, refugees would be required to live in rural or regional areas of Australia. Any government benefits they received would thus work for the benefit of the rural and regional economy. There are plenty of towns around the country which would welcome an increase in their population.
It would take a bit of political selling, although I suspect that rural and regional Australia would be quick to see the benefits of this new approach.
But it should not be too hard to persuade the community that we can do better than we are doing now. The present system is supported by lies. Of course criminals should be treated as criminals. But when you see that boat people are not criminals it is more difficult to understand, much less accept, our treatment of them.
I believe most Australians are decent, generous people. Our record in both world wars stands as a tribute to our national character; our response to the Asian tsunami is another. It was tragic to see our national character brought down by the Howard government’s deceptive rhetoric about boat people (most of it calculated to win back voters who had drifted to One Nation).
It is equally tragic to see our national character being damaged by a Labor government which does not have the political spine to tell it like it is: to point out to voters that there is a better way; that we are better than this.
Comments on this article are now closed.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
"The latest announcements about boat-people involved heading further down the wrong track: a track marked out by the Howard government for political reasons"
That is YOUR opinion and nothing more Julian Burnside!
Heading down the wrong path is what you advocate pal!
An uncomfotable reality you must sooner or later face is that compassion and charity is finite in the same way that water, food and minerals are finite resources.
How many 'refugees' are there in the world at present, all…
Read moreFelix MacNeill
Environmental Manager
That's right Greg, Julian's opinion is just an opinion, but yours is fact.
It's called paranoia and it's treatable. Therapy by trolling, however, is not effective and simply tends to aggravate the self-aggrandisement.
con vaitsas
worker
I agree with most of your comments Julian except that Greece's population is not the same as Australia but less than half of it. As long as people fear for their lives they will try and escape to another safe country.
Spiro Vlachos
AL
Con, these people are not fearing for their lives, just opportunists:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/immigration/forced-returns-of-sham-refugees-as-sri-lankans-deported/story-fn9hm1gu-1226522377530
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
"The cost of indefinite detention has to be clearly recognised. Detention on-shore costs around $150,000 per person per year. It costs about $350,000 per person per year to hold them off-shore. "
Oh yeah Julian.
And what about the cost of providing increasing numbers of them with centrelink payments and english lessons while they are on bridging visas etc?
And then providing them with vocational training so they can become productive?
If Australiua and the west has global obligations to cut our excessive consumption and share more with the third world, the third world also has obligations! I.E. To stop adding more mouths to the global population than we can collectively and sustainably provide for.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
How many refugees are ending up in our hospital emergency departments and then not paying their bills, which are left to our cash strapped hospitals to wear?
It is not financiually sustainable now for our public hospitals.
What do you think is going to happen if you throw out the welcome mat to the to the globes few hundred million refugees?
You and your lobby in general are seeking to treat the symptoms of the refugee problem and refusing to acknowledge and address the cause - unsustainable average third world fertility.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
"As I argued in my earlier piece, the number of boat people who get here is small, by any measure."
There is no good reason to assume that the number of boat people will remain small in the long term if you are permitted to throw out the welcome mat Julian.
As with the business community and most politicians your thinking is based on short term gratification and attainment of personal kudos.
Felix MacNeill
Environmental Manager
Greg, I don't suppose there's any chance of you making a statement that actually means anything, is there?
"As with the business community and most politicians your thinking is based on short term gratification and attainment of personal kudos."
There are few things simple, or more useless, than tossing around vague, all-encompassing insluts, unsopported by any evidence and devoid of any alternative proposition.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
"To put this in perspective, each of these responses involves Australia in breaches of various international human rights standards but more importantly it sits badly with our vision of ourselves as a generous, decent nation."
Then Australians need to carefully consider whether or not we should remain signatories of the UN refugee convention if complying with it is at odds with our obligations to our children and grand children.
Including the children and grand children of former refugees who have already become part of our Australian community.
Comment removed by moderator.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
"I believe most Australians are decent, generous people. Our record in both world wars stands as a tribute to our national character; our response to the Asian tsunami is another. "
But nor are we push overs and suckers to those who demand our charity!
Tim Mulligan
logged in via email @gotalk.net.au
Population and environment are real problems that are, and will affect all of us, but they need to be addressed with refugee policy, not against it. A siege mentality poisons the mind leading to a nationalism and social cancer that has historically afflicted parts of the world with the most horrible of outcomes. Fearing boat people is illogical and fortress Australia is no answer to civil war or ethnic hatred elsewhere. It is also worth asking why there are no longer Vietnamese boat people as there was in the 70s. The push factor is largely responsible for the world's refugees. Treat the symptoms with humanity while addressing the real problem.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
RE: Felix MacNeill
Yeah well Felix I am sick to death of the holier than thou preaching from Julian Burnside and Sarah Hanson Young et el who refuse to consider the bigger picture here.
So you are dead right it is indeed 'therapy by trolling' if that is the way you insist on describing it
It is about time that the silent majority of Australians stood up to them and put them back in their plcae!
Mike Hansen
Mr
The "silent majority" ?
I thought that term had gone out of fashion with socks and sandals.
If the bus to Frankston showed anything, it showed that the racists and bigots in our society are anything but silent.
There is a reason why the shock jocks who whip up the anti-refugee frenzy are called "shock jocks" and it is not because they are silent.
Felix MacNeill
Environmental Manager
I rest my case
John Coochey
Mr
You mean like the next election?
Go Go Go!
Sam Keast
logged in via Facebook
You speak of 'our' and 'Australians' like there is some understood, accepted and rightful ownership of this country. As far as I know there is only one group who can lay any real claim to this kind of ownership, indigenous Australians. Oh, wait.....we made them refugees too.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
"It's called paranoia and it's treatable"
May be I am paronoid or may be I have a greater capacity to see the big/long term picture than you do.
You refugee bleeding hearts have a habit of sticking your heads in the sand and ignoring the potential wider and longer term implications of what you are advocating.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
Here is a challenge for Julian Burnside (and the rest of you bleeding hearts).
If he feels so strongly about the plight of refugees then why doesn'display the courage of his convictions?
Follow the example of his Jesus Christ, give up his career, sell up all his worldy possessions, volunteer as an aid worker and use the proceeds of the sale of his assets to help refugees at the source.
Because there are vastly more refugees (and potential refugees), who will never be able to pay for a place on an illegal boat, that might benefit from such hypotentical corageous action by Julian Burnside et el.
Short of this I afraid I can only view the actions of Julian Burnside as career self interest!
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Spiro Vlachos
AL
A number of falsities in this article.
The population of Greece is approximately half of Australia.
Greece is not bankrupt.
Our national character has been damaged, but only in the eyes of recent legal immigrants, because we give a free pass and welfare benefits to those who jump on boats, whereas legal immigrants have to pay and sometimes in tens of thousands of dollars.
This is moral vanity from someone who tweets "paedos in speedos".
Mike Hansen
Mr
Greece may not be technically bankrupt but it is not in great financial shape which is the essential point that Julian was making.
But you knew that Spiro. You just thought that you could score a cheap point.
More relevant in the Greek experience is the growth of the fascist* Golden Dawn party who are targetting what they call "immigrant scum".
Anna Diamantopoulou, a former EU commissioner says
"I never imagined that something like Golden Dawn would happen here, that Greeks could vote for such people," she sighed. "This policy they have of giving food only to the Greeks and blood only to the Greeks. The whole package is terrifying. This is a party based on hate of 'the other'. Now 'the other' is immigrants, but who will 'the other' be tomorrow?"
* The term fascist can be thrown about as a term of abuse. Unfortunately the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn are the real deal.
John Coochey
Mr
Well regarding bankruptcy you could have fooled me! By the way what social security benefits are paid to illegal immigrants/asylum shoppers in Greece? Bugger all is my understanding which is why you will see them on the streets selling trinkets to make a living before moving to other EEC countries with better benefits eg the UK.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
Felix I have previously pointed out that there is no justification for Julian to assume that the number of illegal immigrants will remain at the current low numbers in the long term if we dump mandatory detention and other deterent measures.
How about you people providing evidence for your assumption that illegal immigration WIILL NOT escelate out of control if all deterrent measures are dropped!
Sean Manning
Physicist
The comments from the honourable Greg Boyles have helped me a great deal in my quest to discover if there is a link between xenophobia and ignorance. Thank you greatly for this very convincing data point.
Obviously I require more to guarantee the integrity of my statistics, however, I'm sure there will be plenty more to follow in this discussion thread.
Comment removed by moderator.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
Thanks for the free advertising Sean. IT will no doubt to contribute to my google ranking.
And I don't fear you associating my website with your racist/xenophobe slurs.
Why? Because the vast majority of my clients are blue collar workers who think similarly to me on this issue. Not holier than thou academics like you!
Including one client that I am working for at this very moment who is of Indian herritage and is outraged at the prospect of illegal immigrants being given centrelink payments while they are on bridging visas.
So your collective notion that only anglo-saxons are 'xenophobic' is flawed!
Comment removed by moderator.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
RE: Tim Mulligan
I agree about siege mentallity posioning the debate.
But Julian et el are maintaining thier own siege line regarding refugees and, as long as they do, I and a majority of Australian will react by maintaining our own siege line!
And you comment about fortress Australia is illogical.
Is it your positions that nations shouyld be abolished and that people should be able to move any where that they please?
If so I vehermently disgaree with you.
If not then maintaining sovereignty REQUIRES that we have a 'fortress Australia' so some extent.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
RE: Rick Fleckner
Yes I am for real Rick!
And your comment is a strawman argument.
Illegal refugees are as human as I am regardless of their ethnicity or skin colour.
But that is irrelevant to this debate in my view.
We have obligations to future generations of Australians (including the non-anglo-saxon ones) as well as to refugees.
Selling out the prospects of future generations of Australians to appease our short term moral pangs is not an option as far as I cam concerned.
We should help those refugees that we can now without threatening the future of following generations.
It does not serve anyone's long term interests to allow Australia to become as over populated and degraded as many of the refugee source countries are at present resulting in the 'push' for them to come to Australia illegally.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
There are ways we should be helping the world's refugees that will bring long term benefit rather than short term superficial fixes.
Principally among those measure is providing them with free contraception and family planning to help them substantially reduce the excessive number of new mouths to feed that they keep adding at present.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
You are wasting your time Mike Hanson.
Your racist slurs will not deter me.
Water off a ducks back!
Mike Hansen
Mr
Falsely accusing me of racism will not magically mask your xenophobia.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
RE: vietnamese refugees.
I posit the following.
Despite superficial human politics, conflict of all flavours is directly proportional competition among humans for scarce resources, i.e. when the population size exceeds the country's or region's capacity to provide sufficient resources to meet the needs and wants of the people living there.
Hence we get periodic wars, genocide and sectarian conflicts which reduces the regions population through death or emmigration.
The competition for…
Read moreGreg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
It is also important to note that an over populated country is not necessarily a densely populated country.
But by the same token a densely populated country is not necessarily over populated.
I posit that human conflict is the glaring marker of over population.
Comment removed by moderator.
Comment removed by moderator.
Spiro Vlachos
AL
Greg, it is important to note that people like him and the author resort to personal abuse and mistruths in appealing to a very small minority when they are attempting to justify failure. Julian and Mike would probably want us to believe that people smugglers are doing an important humanitarian community service bringing those disaffected and persecuted souls to our shores!
State your case and leave the childish personal abuse up to them. Julian is a serial offender here pandering to the chattering zealots with his offensive tweet about the opposition leader.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
One view that I share strongly with my majority blue collar clients is that I bl00dy well object to Sri Lankens (or whom ever) arriving here uninvited and demanding my charity by hijacking commercial vessels, sowing their lips together and slashing their arms etc.
Take in refugees from official UN camps but send these Sri Lankens etc straight back to where they came from.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
Thanks Spiro.
But I am afraid I get as much satisfaction in socking it to them as much as they no doubt enjoy socking it to me.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
RE: Sean Manning
So Indians are racist bastards according to you huh Sean.
What other ethinic groups to you consider racist then?
So apparently you are labouring under the self delusion that you are apart from and superior to the 99% of the human race.
I bet that some one really closley examined your life and attitudes then many of your own unavoidable xenophobic tendancies would be revealed.
In fact I think we have revealed one of those tendancies just now!
Andrew Remely
logged in via Facebook
Great article and I think it important to include a more rational approach to the debate.
Let put the emotion and rhetoric aside for a moment. The current approach is expensive and not effective. Even if you support a “get tough on illegal arrivals” view it is important to understand the budget implications. Do folks with this view think this is money well spend compared to things like health, education, and even defence?
Personally, it really irks me that we are spending a sh*t load on what is essentially an extreme ideological position about illegal migration. I also don’t like the often convenient omission of the cost from the debate.
I’m still amazed about often irrational reaction that articles like this receive. If you don’t agree that’s OK. If you go off an rant you come off looking like a nutter... this does your cause no good at all.
Dianna Arthur
Dianna Arthur is a Friend of The Conversation.
Environmentalist
@ Andrew Remeley
I agree. It is worth placing part of the Greens refugee policy right here in order to silence the naysayers that the Greens just want to "open our borders" as some have claimed.
Unlike the Libs/Labs, the Greens are aware that people will always try to flee for their lives by whatever means they can.
"The Greens would:
* Close Christmas Island and use a portion of the money already earmarked for use on the island - $973 million over four years - to set up Community Reception…
Read moreJohn Coochey
Mr
Regarding Green's policy (other than brown coal generation for Tasmania" look it up for yourself
"ensure that potential immigrants are not unfairly discriminated against on any grounds.
Read moreincrease the share of places for off-shore refugees and humanitarian entrants.
ensure that funding for public and community sector agencies providing migrant-specific services is increased to a level sufficient to provide adequate, effective and timely support.
ensure the development of networks, materials…
John McLean
logged in via email @connexus.net.au
Send them back home and tell them to apply through proper channels.
Send them back home and tell them to apply through proper channels.
Send them back home and tell them to apply through proper channels.
Send them back home and tell them to apply through proper channels.
That's my four steps. I'm fed up to the gills with it all. I've got refugee fatigue. I still don't see why we should allow these people to arrive without documentation when they obviously had it to flay to Indonesia.
Sam Keast
logged in via Facebook
A good place to start a new way of framing this issue would be to eliminate the assumption that asylum seeker = economic drain. Why not move towards seeing the migration of any people as a way to transmit cultural diversity and develop economically?
Or, we could just continue to hide behind the tatty remains of that frightened, greedy little white Australia policy that seems to still be being tossed around in various guises.