Back in September 2012, an Irish food safety inspector noticed some discrepancies in the labelling and packaging of some frozen meat brought in by a small import-export company. By January 2013, the scandal had become public: almost 30% of the mince beef meat sold in Ireland and in the UK through giant retailing chains such as Tesco, Aldi and Lidl is, in fact, horse meat. Its origin: Poland.
The news forced the largely self-regulated European food industry to launch a series of controls on a variety of frozen meat products. By the end of January, the French food processor Comigel (which also manufactures Tesco, Aldi, Lidl, and Carrefour’s home-brand frozen meat products) advised the frozen food brand Findus that its line of beef lasagne is adulterated with horse meat coming from Romania.
Shortly after the story broke, Findus withdrew most of its meat-based prepared dishes from the retail shelves in most of its European markets. In its wake, other international food manufacturers like Birds Eye and Nestle have had also to withdraw their meat products off the market.
The complexity of the food supply chain is outstanding. Between the French supermarket shelf and the Romanian meat producer (the abattoir) there have been four other intermediaries: the food brand (Findus), the food manufacturer (Comigel), the meat processor (Spanghero), and the trader (a Cypriot and Dutch trader).
Central to the scandal are the meat processor and possibly the trader, who himself had spent nine months in jail for unlawfully selling horse meat from South America as halal beef. It was where the horse meat was re-labelled as being beef meat, for an estimated profit of €550,000.
The scandal is far-reaching in many parts of Europe, from Ireland to the UK, France, Sweden, Germany, Spain and Italy.
There are two key elements to the story.
The first one is to do with an oversupply of inexpensive horse meat. Over-zealous equine breeding programs to cater for the demand of status symbols or playthings have flooded the markets of now cash-strapped owners since the start of the 2008 recession. In Ireland alone, 25,000 animals were sent to slaughter houses in 2012. In the United Kingdom, the number is closer to 9,000.
The cause is different in Eastern Europe. In Romania, legislation forbidding horse carriages on roads has led to many of these animals being sent to the abattoirs.
Today, European meat markets value horse meat at half the value of beef meat. More than 60,000 tonnes of horse meat were traded by European countries in 2012 and this includes “horse-like” animals, such as donkeys, mules, and asses.
The other key element to the story is to understand how the food supply chain falls victim to opportunistic behaviours. The food industry, mostly concerned with costs and “just on time” management, has developed very long supply chains to facilitate the purchase of ingredients for processed foods at the cheapest prices, and to provide flexibility by outsourcing the processing activities to small or medium size operators. The longer the chain, the higher is the risk of integrity break-down.
The recent push for self-regulation in the food industry has considerably changed the food safety operational structures. In the UK, for instance, food safety controls are now outsourced by UK Food Standards Agency to the private sector. At the height of the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crisis the FSA employed 1700 inspectors; today there are only 800. The reduction in enforcement powers has been justified by claims of greater transparency and traceability, claims that are hardly sustainable in light of recent events.
The squeeze on prices for “economy lines” of processed foods from supermarket chains and brand names is pivotal to explaining the breakdown. When UK Tesco retails 450 grams of spaghetti bolognese for only £1 (AU$1.50) it implicitly accepts that these low-cost meat products are of mitigated quality. Under current European legislation, food companies are under no obligation to disclose the provenance of the meat contained in these prepared meals.
Changing meat consumption patterns can partly explain the magnitude of the public reaction to the fraud. Not only has horse meat been abandoned by continental European meat eaters in recent years, but consumers are increasingly relying on the convenience of ready (and processed) meals.
Could this happen in Australia? Most probably.
As in Europe, too many horses are being bred in Australia, creating an oversupply of inexpensive horse meat coming out of abattoirs and knackeries. The Australian food supply chain shows the same level of complexity as its European counterpart.
The highly concentrated meat processing sector, in the hands of three major international companies (the American Cargill, the Brazilian JBS, and the Japanese Nippon Meat Packers) is also subject to aggressive pricing forces from traders, food companies and retailers.
Industry self-regulation is extensively practised in Australia as a complement to government regulation. In NSW, the NSW Food Authority has implemented a system whereby food businesses with a satisfactory compliance history moved to a self-regulated auditing model for which the frequency is to be determined on a case by case basis by an appointed external auditor (FSANZ Standard 3.2.1).
How safe is it to eat horse meat? At a nutritional level, horse meat can be an excellent lean source of protein and iron when bred for human consumption. However, most horses are routinely treated with an anti-inflammatory drug (phenylbutazone or “bute”), which can cause a potentially life-threatening illness to humans. Horse passports are supposed to record “bute” treatment and therefore prevent human consumption, but fake passports are circulating and prevent proper control.
Every day we make food choices. Sometimes these choices are informed. More often than not, and especially when purchasing processed food, these choices are based on trust. It would be regrettable if we had to bring a DNA tester along every time we visit our local supermarket.
Andrea Smith
Research Associate, School of Public Health, University of Sydney
You ask whether this could ever happen in Australia. I would say undoubtedly. Most of us undervalue food and are prepared to think about our hip pocket rather than the ethics and ‘business’ of food production. Your comment re Tesco retailer says it all:
“When UK Tesco retails 450 grams of spaghetti bolognese for only £1 (AU$1.50) it implicitly accepts that these low-cost meat products are of mitigated quality”
And it’s not just Tesco, it's all of us. And it's not just meat: the same comment could apply to many of the food 'products' we buy and consume.
Corinne Cowper
general layabout
I agree Andrea. We made a decision some years ago to go for quality food from a known source so we felt comfortable about what we eat.
These days, only the basics come from the supermarket, e.g., cheese, flour, milk, occasional tinned tomatoes and beans. We enjoy eating better quality, fresh food that we prepare ourselves without wondering what's in it.
Brigit Busicchia
PhD Candidate, Political Economy at Macquarie University
I agree with you Andrea, it is not just Tesco or meat based products.
There is another dimension to this story and it is to do with the equity of the food system. Prepared meals (and frozen) are over-represented in the low-budget end of the food supply implying that socially disadvantaged groups are more likely to use these products than affluent people.
And to join the dots with Michael's comment below, governments should not allow self-regulation for food production for reasons of public health and social fairness (or justice).
Pat OBrien
Activist
Lets not forget the "roo in the stew scandal" in the early '80's. Those of us who were involved in the meat Industry at the time, also were aware of truckloads of buffalo meat from the NT arriving at small Victorian meat works and being unloaded and processed at night. Meat substitution in Australia has happened before, its probably still happening, and will happen again. I've also heard recently of venison being included in kangaroo meat exports too.
Michael Croft
logged in via LinkedIn
"Industry self-regulation is extensively practised in Australia......."
It ought to be self evident that private corporations sole raison d'etre is profit generation and shareholder wealth maximisation, as such they cannot be trusted to regulate themselves for the common good of all citizens when this is at odds with their only reason for existence.
Frankly I don't understand why "industry self-regulation cannot be trusted" is not written in stone in government statutes - perhaps we need a revised Australian constitution, "We hold these truths to be self-evident; that private corporations cannot be trusted to work for the common good of all Australians........."
Oh, and the longer the supply chain, the more industries and oxymoronic self-regulations are involved. What could possibly go wrong?
Pamela Curr
logged in via Facebook
What shocked me is the food miles- frozen dinners from Romania on the shelves in UK. Surely this is crazy.
I wont buy almonds and oranges from California or garlic from China etc etc.
Where is our sense of proportion not to mention our moral sense?
LOCAL FARMERS PRODUCING FOOD LOCALLY is best for all of us.
Those flower farms in Kenya and the Phillipines are not feeding the poor people but
they are lining the pockets of AGRI BUSINESS while decorating the homes in Europe.
The world has gone mad.
Michael Croft
logged in via LinkedIn
But wait - there's more madness....
Some English 'local' apples are flown to South Africa where they are washed, waxed and labelled, then flown back to the UK where they are sold as "fresh local apples". So much for buying local.
or
Dutch potatoes are trucked to Spain where they are washed. Then they are trucked back to Holland for processing. This came to light when Spain was in a severe drought and the people were suffering water restrictions. Profits before people!
neral
logged in via Twitter
I know what you mean by food being sent around the world to take advantage of lower cost production, whether in processed foods (where labour cost can be a factor) or just plain out cheaper overall costs of production (government subsidies can confuse the issue, though). In the light of this, though, can anyone explain why I could buy nice fresh strawberries from Wanneroo (north of Perth city) in Carrefour in say Dubai cheaper than what I could in Coles in Perth itself (and I assume they were airfreighted in)? Same goes for Australian beef, which I bet you can buy cheaper in some countries than what you can in Australia. System transparency is muddy, at best, and does a disservice to everyone on the planet except the few who have monetary or policy control.
Eric Anderson
Eternal Student
For Australians, I think an important unacknowledged food risk lies across the Tasman. New Zealand considers Country of Origin labelling "a voluntary practice for the food industry to use as a marketing tool." (See http://www.foodsmart.govt.nz/whats-in-our-food/food-labelling/country-of-origin/) My impression is that the kiwis prefer to keep these things vague for food export marketing purposes.
The complexities are too great to go into here (cf the PDF linked at http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/303666 ), but rest assured that if those frozen vegetables were expensively and substantially tranformed, reading a packet in the supermarket is a quite unreliable way to screen out the produce of a nation a consumer might consider distasteful or potentially unsafe.
Riley Breen
Student
According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_meat#Attitude_of_various_cultures), the legal definition of Meat in Australia does not include horse meat, which makes it much less likely to happen. In Europe this is only distasteful, but here it would be illegal.