Small businesses that invest in paid parental leave and other work-life balance programs are more likely to retain quality employees, a survey has found.
Charles Sturt University’s Stacey Jenkins looked at how 219 small and medium-sized enterprises across Australia tried to improve work-life balance for their employees.
The most common practices were flexi-time, which gives employees more control over which hours they work; additional paid parental leave; support benefits, and on-site care arrangements, such as dedicated breast feeding areas.
“If the employers were offering these it could have positive impact, with employees being more likely to take fewer sick days,” Jenkins said.
She said the research showed how important paid parental leave schemes are in maintaining a high quality workforce.
“Without them, it poses a real difficulty in employees being able to meet the needs of their families but also being able to stay within the workforce,” she said.
“For employers, the major benefit is in attracting and retaining staff, especially for employers in non-metropolitan areas where there’s a limited pool of qualified employees.”
The study found that all employees, not just those with families, could benefit from such programs.
“For younger workers or those who don’t have children or caring responsibilities, there’s still a need for them to manage their stress levels.”
Barbara Pocock, Director of the Centre for Work and Life at the University of South Australia, said increased flexibility is a growing trend for all businesses.
“Flexibility is certainly increasing and we know that many employers, including small businesses, understand that they have to respond to what their employees want in terms of work patterns,” she said.
“A lot of small businesses have invested in their employees, who know their business really well. They don’t want to lose those people.”
“That’s partly because of the changing nature of the workforce with one in two workers now being women,” she said. “But it’s also about making the best of the people who have experience and qualifications in the business that they’re trying to grow.”
Stacey Jenkins' research has been submitted to the International Journal of Human Resources today.
Craig Minns
Self-employed
I find it hard to take the research seriously when there is a such a glaring error as the statement: "one in two workers now being women"
The ABS participation rate for men is about 80% and for women it is around 65%.
I am all for flexibility, but let's not gild the lily.
Dale Bloom
Analyst
I have rarely found an objective or accurate account of anything to do with gender from a university.
There does appear to be certain industries men and women predominate.
"In 2010-11, the largest proportion of the employed population aged 20 to 74 years of age (12%) worked in the Health Care and Social Assistance industry. This industry also employed the largest proportion of the female workforce (21%), while 5% of employed males worked in this industry. Of those employed in this industry…
Read moreStacey Jenkins
Teacher
I can't speak for Barbara but perhaps reference when she made this statement she was referring to the following ABS site http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/6306.0
which states "In May 2010, 50.1% of all employees were male and 49.9% of all employees were female."
Craig Minns
Self-employed
That's fascinating, Stacy, thanks. I must look further into why there's such a vast discrepancy between the participation rate and the figures you quote.
Craig Minns
Self-employed
Stacy, I've looked up the ABS in relation to the discrepancy. They carefully say that the figures you quoted are not comparable to the Labour Force series, so I looked up that series
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/6291.0.55.003Aug%202012?OpenDocument
It says that total male employed persons is 6183800 while the total female employed persons is 5218000. In other words, women make up about 45% of all employed persons, while men are about 55%, or nearly 25% more than women
This seems to correlate quite well with the figures I quoted.
I wonder whether Prof Pocock might like to clarify her assertion that 1 in 2 workers is a woman?
Firozali A.Mulla
PhD
25/11/2012European banks have asked the European Commission to postpone the introduction of tougher global bank capital rules by a year to 2014 after US regulators told lenders they did not expect the new regulations to take effect in 2013. The tougher rules, known as Basel III, are the world's regulatory response to the 2007-09 financial crisis and would force banks to triple the amount of basic capital they hold in a bid to avoid future taxpayer bailouts. The European Banking Federation sent a letter on Nov 21 to EU Internal Market Commissioner Michel Barnier, formally requesting a delay on the grounds that EU banks would be at a competitive disadvantage if they introduced the new rules before their US counterparts. . I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA