UK United Kingdom

Tracing the Earth’s hottest volcanoes from core to ore

Volcanic eruptions are as old as the planet itself. They inspire awe, curiosity and fear and demonstrate the dynamic internal activity of the Earth. However, the impact of modern volcanoes pales in comparison…

Nailing down the sites of ancient volcanic eruptions could help identify mineral deposits. Ásgeir Kröyer/Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA

Volcanic eruptions are as old as the planet itself. They inspire awe, curiosity and fear and demonstrate the dynamic internal activity of the Earth. However, the impact of modern volcanoes pales in comparison to those that graced our planet millions (even billions) of years ago.

These include “supervolcanoes”, volcanic eruptions a thousand times more powerful than the 1980 eruption of Mt St Helens; and large igneous provinces (LIPs), which consist of rapid outpourings of more than one million cubic kilometres of basaltic lava, such as the Siberian Traps in Russia.

In a paper published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, my colleagues and I set out to find how the hottest and rarest type of volcanoes – the ancient komatiites – were formed.

Knowing how and why komatiites are concentrated in specific belts could help discover new ore deposits, potentially worth billions of dollars.

Komatiite lava flows date back around 1.8 to 3.4 billion years and formed when Earth’s mantle (the layer between the crust and the outer core) was much hotter.

Earth’s layers. Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

They erupted at temperatures exceeding 1,600C and produced hose-like fire fountains and lava flows that travelled at more than 40km/h as bluish-white, turbulent lava rivers.

These crystallised to form some of the world’s most spectacular igneous rocks – as well as a number of giant nickel deposits, found mainly in Western Australia and Canada.

A 3.4-billion-year-old komatiite flow from the Barberton greenstone belt in South Africa, where these ultra-high temperature lavas were first recognised. The A-zone (upper) is dominated by fine crystals of olivine called ‘spinifex texture’, while the B-zone (lower) consists of a solid matrix of olivine crystals, which mark the base of the komatiite lava river. David Mole

Komatiites have been studied for more than 60 years and are fundamental in developing our knowledge of the thermal and chemical evolution of the planet, but until recently we didn’t understand why they formed where they did.

So how are komatiites formed?

Komatiites are found in ancient pieces of crust, or cratons, preserved from the Archean Eon (2.5 to 3.8 billion years ago). These cratons contain greenstone belts – preserved belts of volcanic and sedimentary material that often contain deposits of precious metals.

Granitic rocks, such as the 2.675-billion-year-old monzogranite shown here, are the dominant rock type that form the Archean continental crust in the Yilgarn Craton. Left: monzogranite hand specimen. Right: the same sample under the microscope. David Mole

Many cratons exist worldwide. One of the largest is Western Australia’s Yilgarn Craton, which hosts most of the gold and nickel mined in Australia. This craton has only a few specific belts that contain major komatiite flows.

Previous research shows that komatiites were formed from mantle plumes – upwelling pipes of hot material that stretch from the outer core to the base of the crust.

Around 2.7 billion years ago in a huge global event referred to as a “mantle turnover”, multiple mantle plumes formed, and one hit the base of the early Australian continent – the Yilgarn Craton, forming some of the hottest lavas ever erupted on Earth.

When plumes first hit the base of the lithosphere – the 50-250km-thick rigid outer shell of the Earth – they spread out into discs of hot material more than 1,000km in diameter.

Today there is evidence of this in places such as the huge Deccan basalts that cover much of India.

Despite this spread, komatiite belts are sparse and only found in certain areas. One of our research goals was to find out why.

The mineralised base of a komatiite lava river, from Kambalda, Western Australia. A: the underlying basalt with evidence of melting by the overlying komatiite. B: the massive nickel sulphide ore that pools at the base of the komatiite lava river. C: the overlying komatiite lava flow. David Mole

Mapping the early Australian continent

We used specific isotopes of the element hafnium to determine the age of the crust that formed the granites (the material which makes up the cratons) and if it had a mantle or a crustal source.

Mapping out the isotopic compositions of the granites revealed a jigsaw pattern in the crust, and regions where the granites formed by melting pre-existing, much older crustal rocks.

It also showed younger areas where the crust was newly created from sources in the deeper mantle.

By collecting samples of Archean granites from all over the Yilgarn Craton, we were able to map the changing shape of the Archean continent through time.

When we compared the nature and shape of the continent with the location of the major komatiite events, we found a remarkable correlation. The maps showed that the major komatiite belts and their ore deposits were located at the edge of the older continental regions.

By imaging the older, thicker and younger, thinner areas of ancient lithosphere in the Yilgarn Craton, we were able to map the three-dimensional architecture of the craton and explain why komatiites are localised in specific belts. Plume melts are ‘channeled’ into the younger, thinner continental areas, resulting in a concentration of komatiites, and their associated ore deposits, in these areas. David Mole

This is due to the shape at the base of the ancient Australian continent. As the plume rises, it impacts the older, thick lithosphere first.

As a result the plume cannot generate much magma so it flows upwards along the base of the lithosphere into the shallower, younger areas. Here huge volumes of magma are generated at the boundary between the old, thick and young, thin areas of the lithosphere, so komatiites and their nickel deposits are located at the margins of Earth’s early continents.

Some research questions remain. The origin of the continents imaged in our study and the tectonic system that formed them is still unknown.

What our work shows is that continent growth significantly affects the location, style and type of later volcanism, as well as the location of major ore deposit areas.

We hope that this work will help unravel the volcanic history of other ancient geological terranes, as well as aid in the search for mineral deposits in relatively unexplored cratons such as those in West Africa and central Asia.

Sign in to Favourite

Join the conversation

9 Comments sorted by

  1. Robert Molyneux

    Citizen at Drehmex Sales and Services

    An excellent article, Dr Mole, burrowing down into the Earth!
    Do you have any thoughts about whether there are segregated bodies within the core. That is, has the liquid core been thoroughly mixed over time, so that its composition is fairly constant, or are there bodies (presumably harking back to when the Earth was first conglomerated together out of star matter) still there. So for example, there could be a glob of gold, or a glob of lanthanides, and so on, that a magma flow might drag to the surface.

    1. David R Mole

      OCE Post-doctoral Fellow at CSIRO

      In reply to Robert Molyneux

      Hi Robert - and thanks!
      Core formation on Earth, and in the other terrestrial planets, is believed to have occurred within the first 60-30 million years of planet formation, so in geological time virtually straight away. In the magma ocean that was the very primordial Earth, liquid sulphur would have scavenged certain sulphur-loving elements such as Platinum, nickel, and iron. This liquid sulphur would then be transported to the planets core due to its high density. It is also likely there was a…

      Read more
    2. Robert Molyneux

      Citizen at Drehmex Sales and Services

      In reply to David R Mole

      A question is did the Earth come about through a merging of "mists" or "blobs: of star stuff . So for example the gold production described in the link might have ended up with largish lumps moving through space, or simply a fine dispersion.
      Then when the various mists and / or blobs of different elements came together a ball of uniform composition could have resulted, or a ball with lenses and blobs of elements.
      If the former, then I would expect that magmas would have uniform composition everywhere and everywhen. If the latter, then I would expect different magma events would result with some having concentrations of elements.
      Lots of fun, but not much chance of knowing?

    3. David R Mole

      OCE Post-doctoral Fellow at CSIRO

      In reply to Robert Molyneux

      The details of these processes are a little beyond my expertise, but from a geological perspective, it appears that matter gradually amalgamated and accumulated from dust and gas through a process of coalescence, collision and accretion, to form larger masses. Some of these primitive masses may even have differentiated into core-mantle (i.e. iron-nickel meteorites represent fragments of the cores). Many of these cores are rich in Platinum group elements, as well as gold, although I am not sure there…

      Read more
    4. Robert Molyneux

      Citizen at Drehmex Sales and Services

      In reply to David R Mole

      Hi David, thanks for your response.
      Purely speculative of course, but once the blobs came together, with gravity tending to make the result a sphere, I wonder what the forces would be to actually "stir" the core to attain homogeneity.
      I can see how the relatively thin mantle through the millennia of heating / melting / tectonics would become homogenous..

    5. David R Mole

      OCE Post-doctoral Fellow at CSIRO

      In reply to Robert Molyneux

      This is a very challenging discipline, as all our knowledge of the core comes from deep geophysical techniques and experimental work. Geophysics tells us about the temperature and 'state' of the core, but little about composition, which is mainly inferred from meteorites and experiments. As a result it is unclear how homogenous the core is - if I were to speculate, it may be that prior to crystallisation, some convective processes drove a 'stirring' process - but this would not have lasted very long - perhaps less than 30 million years, so it is unclear as to the degree to which homogenisation occurred.

      We know the mantle has certain 'stirring' properties from the Platinum group element history of komatiites:

      However the core is much more difficult to 'trace' as we have no eruptive expression. The reference below may offer more insights:

    6. Robert Molyneux

      Citizen at Drehmex Sales and Services

      In reply to David R Mole

      Hi David, I did not know about the meteorite showers adding platinum group element to the crust subsequent to the Earths' initial formation. Thanks very much.

  2. John McDowell

    geophysics engineer

    An interesting article that revived memories of exploration fieldwork that in the 1980s east of Southern Cross WA where the long time surface weathering masked the underlying volcanic rock. An old well sinker joined our team to help with transport. soon he was identifying narrow (3 to 10 metre wide) volcanic dykes of apparent high temperature due to the wide aura (5 to 10 meter either side) of heat effected country rock. Lines porous vents in the heat effected country rock were drains for rare heavy rain that we presumed facilitated deep weathering of the volcanic rock. We plotted the dykes whenever or survey work crossed them eventually finding rock samples that identified as komatiite. The straightness and length of the dykes were exceptional (up to 50km) making identification of the emanating centres quite easy to locate. Since our commodity target was gold no geological use was made of our interesting findings.

    1. David R Mole

      OCE Post-doctoral Fellow at CSIRO

      In reply to John McDowell

      Hi John - Yes I know Southern Cross well - we did a lot of sampling and camping around that area for this project. Komatiites are known from the area, although they are typically thinner and less extensive than the major flow complexes in the Eastern Goldfielfds and Forrestania area (south of Southern Cross). In the paper discussed above - we think that these komatiites were focused by older continents but not to the same extent as these other areas - as a result the Southern Cross komatiites were erupted very hot, but at a lower rate. The eruption rate seems to be critical for the formation of the nickel deposits, hence there are no known deposits in this belt, apart from the small resource at Trough Well. Check out the link below for some more info on the Southern Cross komatiites: