Why Michigan matters

President Obama has carried Michigan, a state noted for its troubled car-making industry. EPA/Steve Pope

Moments after its polls closed, networks called Michigan for President Obama. That’s important for two reasons.

First, it shows that in the auto-industry states of the Rust Belt, Obama has closed the deal. Michigan may be more Democratic than the all-important swing state of Ohio, but it’s a good sign for Obama that the race there wasn’t close. The auto bailout may have saved not just the industry but the president’s re-election chances.

Second, it indicates that political journalists fell for some sleight-of-hand from the Romney campaign. A few feints from Romney toward the state and suddenly everyone was talking about how Michigan may be the newest swing state. But this is a feature of the new unlimited-spending race: campaigns can throw money at states they would never have contested otherwise. The media have been slow to catch on to this, assuming that any application of resources is a response to internal numbers that indicate a state is in play. That’s no longer a safe assumption. Unlimited spending has already altered American elections in fundamental ways, but it will take the press – and the rest of us – a while to figure out just how changed things really are.

Join the conversation

Post a Comment sorted by

    There are no comments on this article yet.
    To have your say and join The Conversation please sign in if you have an account already, or sign up.