Menu Close

Bank executives forced before parliamentary committee for ‘regular health check’

Malcolm Turnbull announced the banks would now be regularly accountable to the parliament. Mick Tsikas/AAP

Malcolm Turnbull has announced that the heads of Australia’s big four banks will be grilled annually by the House of Representatives economics committee, as the government hits back at the banks’ refusal this week to pass on the full interest rate cut.

Turnbull, who fronted the media with Treasurer Scott Morrison, said the banks “operate under a social licence”. “They are built on a foundation of trust and they have to earn that trust through being open and accountable at all times.”

In what the government dubs a “regular health check”, Turnbull said the banks would appear at least once a year “to give a full account of the way in which they are managing their affairs, their dealing with customers, their interest rate policy”.

The banks would be regularly accountable to the Australian people through parliament “in exactly the same way as the Reserve Bank and APRA [the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority],” he said. The appearances would be part of the “regular financial calendar”.

The move follows Turnbull’s Wednesday tongue-lashing of the banks for passing on only part of the 25 basis points cut, and the pressure the government has been under from Labor which continues to advocate a royal commission into the banks.

The banks will be required to explain:

  • international economic and financial market developments and how they were affecting Australia
  • developments in prudential regulation, including capital requirements, and their effect on Australian banks’ policies
  • the costs of funds, impacts on margins, and the basis for bank interest rate pricing decisions
  • how individual banks and the industry as a whole were responding to issues previously raised in parliamentary inquiries through their package of reforms announced in April
  • bank perspectives on the performance of the Australian economy.

Continuing his attack of earlier this week, Turnbull said there was “no commercial basis… other than to improve their profitability,” for the banks not to pass on the full rate cut. “They must provide a full account of why they have not done so.”

He said the new requirement “will become, if you are a bank chief executive appearing before the House economics committee, part of your regular annual schedule”. He noted that the committee could have additional hearings and call people back.

Morrison said the government had been in touch with the banks about its announcement and had also consulted with the Reserve Bank and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and had advised APRA. “So there’s been an appropriate assessment and consideration of how this process would work.”

The Australian Bankers Association chief executive Steven Munchenberg said the government was entitled to call the banks before a parliamentary committee but noted pointedly that “no other businesses are required to justify their commercial pricing decisions in this way”.

“We are confident banks can explain why the interest rates they set for borrowers are determined largely by the costs of funds and the pressures of a highly competitive market, not the Reserve Bank cash rate.”

He said that in making interest rate decisions “banks have to balance the needs of borrowers and savers, and shareholders in banks, most of whom are also ordinary Australians”.

Opposition Leader Bill Shorten said Turnbull was protecting the banks.

This response was a “cop out” from a weak prime minister who was “in the pockets of the big banks”.

“There is nothing Mr Turnbull won’t do to protect the big banks from a Royal Commission. After giving them a $7 billion tax cut, he’s now inviting them to lunch in Canberra once a year so he can wag his finger at them. This is a friendly catch-up, not an investigation,” Shorten said.

Shorten said that Turnbull was only doing what the banks would let him do. “We know this because he admitted he checked with them to see if this is okay.”

Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 184,300 academics and researchers from 4,971 institutions.

Register now