In the absence of comprehensive AI regulation from Congress, the executive branch is building on its previous efforts to address AI harms.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on AI transparency
Displaying all articles
ChatGPT is fuelled by our intimate online histories. It’s trained on 300 billion words, yet users have no way of knowing which of their data it contains.
We’re facing a significant advance in AI using methods that are not described in scientific literature, and with datasets restricted to a single for-profit company.
Politicians of all stripes, computer professionals and even big-tech executives are calling on government to hit the brakes on using these algorithms. The feds are hitting the gas.
No one knows exactly how AI-based DNA analysis software works, so it can’t be scrutinised in court.
Top contributors
-
Professor of AI, Research Group Leader, UNSW Sydney
-
Professor in Business Information Systems, University of Sydney
-
Postdoctoral research fellow, University of Strathclyde
-
Professor of Computer, Web and Cognitive Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
-
Professor of Information Systems, Michigan State University
