Sections

Services

Information

UK United Kingdom

9/11: Why suicide bombers blow themselves up

Ten years ago, nineteen young Muslims commandeered passenger jets and killed themselves, taking with them 2973 people to the inferno of fire. Since the 9/11 attacks, suicide bombings have become a staple…

The father of Nael Abu Hlayel, who blew himself up in Israel in 2002, holds up pictures of his son. AAP

Ten years ago, nineteen young Muslims commandeered passenger jets and killed themselves, taking with them 2973 people to the inferno of fire. Since the 9/11 attacks, suicide bombings have become a staple of daily news.

A commonly accepted narrative frames these attacks as a modern phenomenon of self-destruction perpetrated by psychologically impaired, morally deficient, uneducated, improvised individuals and, most of all, religious fanatics.

But the analysis of information based on 1597 suicide attacks between 1981 and 2008 which killed over 21,000 people in 34 countries undermines this common perception that the psychopathology of suicide bombers and their religious beliefs are the principle causes.

The findings published in my book Life as a Weapon present a detailed analysis of suicide bombings as a method of choice among terrorist groups around the world and the motivations.

Surprisingly, altruism emerges as major factor in the complex set of causes behind the suicide attacks.

In its most fundamental character altruism, following the seminal studies of economist Ernest Fehr and his colleagues, can be defined as being costly actions that confer benefits on other individuals.

Altruism is a fundamental condition accounting for human co-operation for organisation of society and its cohesiveness.

In the conceptual map of French sociologist Emile Durkheim, suicide bombings would fall in the category of altruistic suicidal actions.

These are distinct from other types of suicidal actions caused by personal catastrophes and feelings of hopelessness which lead people to believe that life is not worth living.

On the other hand, altruistic suicides involve, believing one’s life is less worthy than the group’s honour, religion, or some other collective interests.

The genesis of suicide bombings is rooted in intractable asymmetrical conflicts over political entitlements, territorial occupation and dispossession between the state and non-state actors.

Invariably such conflicts instigate state sanctioned violence and repressive policies against the weaker non-state party or parties causing widespread outrage and large scale dislocation of people, many of whom become refugees in makeshift camps in or outside the “war zones”.

Carolyn Nordstrom captures the mood in Sri Lanka during the recently ended civil war:

“In the war zones, violence and war permeated all aspect of daily life. It was not certain a person going for work would return in the evening. A home could be suddenly searched, someone brutally killed, a mother raped or father taken away. A shell could land anywhere destroying everything around….This kind of pervasive atmosphere of violence, rather than breaking down the resistance and spirit of population, in times creates resistance and defiance, particular in the youth”. Other contributing factors include incarceration and dehumanising treatments of insurgents in state custody and mutual demonisation of the “other”.

Israeli police clean up after a suicide bombing that killed seven people in Jerusalem on June 19 2002. AAP

Suicide bombing, rarely the strategy of first choice, is selected by terrorist organisations after collective assessments, based on observations and experience, of relative effectiveness of different strategies to achieve their political goals.

The decision to participate in a suicide bombing is facilitated by the bomber’s internalised social identities, their exposure to asymmetric conflict and its costs, their exposure to the organisations that sponsor such attacks as well as membership in a larger community where sacrifice and martyrdom carry high symbolic significance.

In Sri Lanka, the Black Tigers wing of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) attached importance to how the community would view their actions.

They were glorified in their burial rituals, and an eternal lamp adorned the tombstone of every Black Tiger grave to commemorate the sacrifice.

From sociological and economic perspectives suicide bombings can be linked to altruism as a form of intergenerational investment or an extreme form of saving in which the agent gives up current consumption for the sake of enhancing the probability of their descendants enjoying the benefit of the future public good.

Analysis of Hezbollah suicide bombers shows that incidents of suicide bombing attacks increase with current income and with the degree of altruism towards the next generation.

Hezbollah suicide bombers come from above-average wealthy families, and have an above average level of education. The willingness of more educated people to engage in suicide missions suggests that education affects deeply one’s view of the world, enhancing sensitivity to the future.

Altruism is also not antithetical to aggression. In war soldiers perform altruistic actions by risking their lives for their comrades and country and also killing the enemy.

The actions of kamikaze pilots in World War II are examples of military sacrifice.

Altruism can also be socially constructed in communities which have endured massive social and economic dislocations as a result of long, violent and painful conflict with a more powerful enemy.

Under such conditions people react to perceived inferiority and the failure of other efforts by valuing and supporting ideals of self-sacrifice such as suicide bombing.

Religiously and nationalistically coded attitudes towards acceptance of death stemming from long periods of collective suffering, humiliation and powerlessness enable political organisations to give people suicide bombing as an outlet for their feelings of desperation, deprivation, hostility and injustice.

Suicide bombings invariably provoke a brutal response from the state authorities, because by injecting fear and mayhem into the ordinary rhythms of daily life, they threaten and undermine the state’s authority in providing security of life and property and in maintaining social order.

Under such conditions the state can legitimately impose altruistic punishments to deter future violation threatening security and social order These include punishments meted out to the perpetrators and their supporters. The state-sanctioned military actions against the Palestinians, Sri Lankan Tamil Tigers, Iraqi insurgents and the Taliban in Pakistan and Afghanistan are examples of these punishments.

But altruistic punishments are only effective when they do not violate the norms of fairness. Punishments and sanctions seen as unfair, hostile, selfish and vindictive by targeted groups tend to have detrimental effects and instead of promoting compliance they reinforce recipients’ resolve to non-compliance.

Counter-insurgency operations are aimed at increasing the cost of insurgency to the insurgents. They invariably involve eliminating leaders and supporters who plan suicide bombings and destroying insurgents’ capabilities for mounting future attacks, restrictions on mobility, security checks and other violations of civil liberties.

But there is mounting evidence that such harsh measures reinforce radical opposition and even intensify it. This is now happening in Pakistan, Afghanistan and the Palestinian territories. It has also been the case in Sri Lanka and Iraq and other conflict sites.

Join the conversation

10 Comments sorted by

  1. John Phillip
    John Phillip is a Friend of The Conversation.

    Grumpy Old Man

    There is only one way to stop suicide bombers and that is the wipe out the human resource pool. Unpleasant and uncivilised and unacceptable (but I am yet to see an effective alternative). Perhaps the article alludes to a possible solution when it descibes the post murder deification of the killers - simply destroy the memorials whenever and wherever they arise much like is the current practice with grafitti.

    report
  2. jenithornley

    logged in via Twitter

    Thanks for your essay Riaz. Not long after the suicide bombings of 9/11 the Sydney Institute for Psychoanalysis held a Conference on "Terror and War". The paper, 'Circles in the Dust' (by Dr. Shahid Najeeb), explored 'fundamentalist states of mind' and 'psychotic processes': http://psychoanalysis.mylithio.com/downunder/backissues/issue2/112/circles_in_dust
    This paper and the subsequent discussion (http://psychoanalysis.mylithio.com/downunder/backissues/issue2/112/discussion_jb) contributed to my understanding of the complex factors that lead non-state actors to turn to suicide bombing as their desired course of action. I think 'Circles in the Dust' and your own discussion of 'collective suffering, humiliation and powerlessness' offer ways to think about this difficult site. It makes me wonder - what if political actors and counter-insurgency operators on all sides had the presence of mind to think more deeply about this?

    report
  3. Paul Richards
    Paul Richards is a Friend of The Conversation.

    Thank you Riaz, I appreciate your perspective and thank you for the article in "The Conversation". I find it interesting you have failed to touch on a primary problem,
    young men from the culture you specialise in suffer isolation from women.

    Segregation that starts very early in life, in a culture that views 'normal' by our standards certain contact with females as out of bounds until marriage near their thirties.

    At a time when the biological need for the opposite sex is a primary driver…

    Read more
    1. Paul Richards
      Paul Richards is a Friend of The Conversation.

      In reply to Thomas Marshall

      Thanks Thomas : ),
      a little black, but so true.

      Sexual segregation, yes. Sexual frustration yes. Unbalanced mindset, a high probability.

      Imagine a landscape where women have a smaller, less effective voice. Where they are viewed as having a lesser moral and intellectual strength, where men are a degree above all women. It starts with early, with young boys having a higher status than grandmothers, mothers, aunties, sisters, female teachers, and all women.

      We here have been largely shielded from this undeveloped thought process, and it is hard to grasp. How different would we be without this very real cultural difference?

      If you look into our cultural history you will recognise how little time has passed since we suffered from a similar imbalance.

      report
    2. Muhummed Shah Idil

      logged in via Twitter

      In reply to Paul Richards

      The issue was left out of the article probably because it isn't very relevant. To see why, I'll highlight some of the inaccuracies in your post.

      Firstly, boys aren't segregated from female members of the family - rather, the family unit is very much an integral part of many of the different ethnic cultures that tend to be Muslim (Arab, African, SE Asian, etc). Often times it is the mother that runs the household and raises the family, and it would be impossible for the "gentler, balanced thought…

      Read more
    3. Paul Richards
      Paul Richards is a Friend of The Conversation.

      In reply to Muhummed Shah Idil

      Muhummed, I commend you for defending your faith, and agree with everything you have said, as these facts you highlight are real. It is pleasing you haven't suffered this type of isolation, and I know personally many Islamic men have benefited from an accurate understanding of religious text and balanced teaching.

      But may I remind you, my comment was talking specifically about how isolated, depressed and poorly mentored young men arrive at suicide as a viable alternative to a life of creating…

      Read more
  4. Gary Luke

    IT services

    For those who do it it's a religious cleansing ritual. Those who organise it have other strategic agendas.

    report
  5. wilma western

    logged in via email @bigpond.com

    A most absorbing article by someone who has studied the suicide bombing phenomenon in depth. Comments about the isolation of certain young men from women are ridiculous and don't accord with known background facts of some of the 9/11 'suicide bombers' . What about the 'black widows' from Chechnya whose motive however may be as much revenge plain and simple ?
    Reading Riaz's article also for me awoke some uncanny and uncomfortable echoes of sermons heard in the Protestant churches of my upbringing - an idealistic young man, a member of a down trodden people , born in a manger , recognised by some as Messiah , courts persecution as he enters Jerusalem on the back of a donkey. Not quite suicide bombing but no avoiding a martyrdom. Of course Riaz would not make this parallel but I'm sure others brought up in a strong Christian background who have since questioned it would recognise some similarities even though violence was forbidden to the disciples.

    report
    1. Paul Richards
      Paul Richards is a Friend of The Conversation.

      In reply to wilma western

      I appreciate your perspective Wilma and am glad you commented.

      "....isolation of certain young men from women are ridiculous."

      Are you saying actually saying that these Shahidka females were influenced by right thinking. Issues commented on and outlined must have been lost on you.

      It is the lack of - influence by women - and the status of females in the remnant tribal Islamic culture that allows the patriarchal solution of suicide bombing to be acceptable.

      Women's position in the Islamic world is on record in many places. e.g.
      http://beta.adb.org/documents/women-pakistan-country-briefing-paper
      A good start would be to look here;
      Women in Islam
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Islam

      report