There’s good news from manufacturers around the world, and this should feed into economic growth.
L’expertise universitaire, l’exigence journalistique
Articles sur Trade
Affichage de 381 à 400 de 600 articles
With Britain’s exit from the EU, China is losing a champion on similar trade and investment issues.
Trump’s agenda to pull America from key global alliances is more evidence that suggests it is. A law professor probes the unknown of what a world without such cooperation might look like.
Next the negotiations begin, and Britain has two years to negotiate a trade deal with the EU if it wants to avoid the WTO cliff edge.
For Australia, Brexit is the diplomatic equivalent of moving into a shared house with a divorcing couple.
A new WTO trade deal is expected to provide up to $1 trillion in economic gains by eliminating bureaucracy. But that’s not its most important benefit.
As the UK sets up post-Brexit trade deals with Commonwealth countries, it should be mindful of history.
The continent needs investment – and China has long been providing it.
The largest economy on the planet is quickly moving to a protectionist stance in its international trade.
Analysis shows there’s less competition and more cross over in trade between Australia and the EU, making a trade deal more appealing.
The decision to give former Eskom CEO, Brian Molefe, a seat in the country’s parliament comes with the potential to cause great economic pain for South Africa.
Can Canada manage to keep up trade while also meeting US expectations for a safe border?
A former ambassador to Mexico explains how Trump’s rhetoric is sparking a backlash that could endanger U.S. economic and national security.
US accusations of German currency manipulation do not appear to be motivated by economics.
Investors have given Donald Trump the thumbs up, so far, but trader sentiment can’t be guaranteed.
Negotiating trade deals is a tremendous task and requires clarity for each and every economic sector involved. Unfortunately, the White Paper offers little detail on this.
Trade under Trump will mean more bilateral agreements, hard bargaining and ultimatums, a sharp departure from Obama’s multilateral, win-win approach.
Trump’s ‘America first’ rhetoric implies that the internationalism and ‘enlightened self-interest’ that built the postwar order was a big mistake. The evidence and basic economics disagree.
It’s all smiles as two leaders meet for the first time, but it’ll take more than warm words to navigate the choppy waters ahead.
Much of the debate around trade deals misses some of the fundamentals of what they actually are and involve.
Les contributeurs les plus fréquents
-
Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, Georgia State University
-
Assistant Professor of Economics, University of California, Merced
-
Tony Walker est un·e ami·e de La Conversation
Vice-Chancellor's Fellow, La Trobe University
-
Lecturer of international trade law, Monash Business School, Monash University
-
Distinguished Professor, Arthur J. Gosnell Professor of Economics, & Interim Head, Department of Sustainability, Rochester Institute of Technology
-
Senior Lecturer in EU and International Economic Law, Queen's University Belfast
-
Reader in Economics, University of Sussex Business School, University of Sussex
-
Former Foundation Professor of Animal Welfare, University of Queensland, Curtin University
-
Senior Lecturer in International Relations, University of Bath
-
Lecturer in History, University of Exeter
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Arizona
-
Senior Lecturer in Economics, Aston University
-
Director and Professor, Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI), University of Technology Sydney
-
Associate Professor, Agri-Food Trade and Policy, University of Guelph
