While Israel and Hamas traded explosive ordnance last month a friend of mine remarked that as a Middle East commentator I had a “future proof profession”. It does seem like that and even I have been known to joke grimly that whatever the latest Middle East stoush is, “it keeps me in a job”. (Cue comments below about feckless and unproductive academics suckling on the public teat.)
Having an almost certain wellspring of events and conflict to comment upon is the sad foundation of Middle East analysis. But however tragically repetitive unrest in the region is, there are still grades of change. In 2011 of course there was the main wave of the Arab Spring, leading to revolutionary upheaval in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Syria, the likes of which had not been seen for decades. In countries like Algeria, Bahrain, Jordan, Morocco and Yemen there were also degrees of abnormal unrest, with varying responses from the incumbent leaders.
By this standard, 2012 looks like a much quieter year, or in some cases a kind of Groundhog Day. Many of the issues and topics I was writing about at the end of 2011 seem to have progressed little in twelve months.

If there is a difference this year though, it might be termed “The rise of the Islamists”. Across the region, particularly where there is rebellion or civic disintegration, political Islam has filled the vacuum. Representative of the differing extent of disorder, the nature of that Islamist manifestation has also varied, from armed insurgency to elected parliaments.
In the coming year or two, the performances, the deeds and the authority of these ideological groupings will provide the road-bed for progress in the region and ultimately, the resolve to move forward from a troubled past.
Although some of the changes in the region may be subtle, it is worth looking at some of the recent issues as a kind of end of year wrap-up. If only because it will offer me a natural hyperlink when I am no doubt writing similar things in 12 months' time!
Libya
Libya spent most of 2012 trying to get its house in order after their lengthy and violent revolution. Regional and ideological differences have played out in the aftermath of the victory, but at present the government seems determined to walk a middle line between the extremes of radical Islamism and liberal democracy. The presence of so much weaponry in private hands is a continued source of trouble, as is the Islamist insurgency on its southern borders. The spectre of al-Qaeda is lurking in the shadows as we saw in the attack on the US ambassador and the destruction of Sufi shrines that presaged it. Libya is the classic head-tails bet for 2013. Things could get better or they could slide the other way.

Egypt
Egypt is the 400-pound canary in the Arab Spring experiment. Its size, regional leadership and intrinsic link to the Israel-Palestine dilemma make its example the one that everyone takes notice of. The last 12 months though have been a slow slog, with little real change happening, thanks to the cart-before-the-horse approach of elections before constitution. The old guard in the military and judicial strata have been part of the problem, but the uneasiness of the wealthier classes and the feeling that the revolution has been hijacked by Islamists is also important. The cheque writers in Washington will be tested by President Morsi and his backers, but the economic and social issues within Egypt are pretty much insoluble.
Syria
Syria offers the most depressing déjà vu. Nearly two years on from the original protests, the country continues to grind itself into rubble and refugees. The West’s unwillingness to step into the cess pit and Russia and China’s intransigence has stopped anything from really happening. The lack of a clearly preferred rebel group has also been problematic, meaning that the Sunni hardline insurgents have been able to step into the vacuum, gleefully backed by the Gulf States. It’s likely there will be a climax some time in 2013, but like the whole conflict so far, it will be prolonged and messy. More Ragnarök than Renaissance.

Iraq
The leadership of Iraq has benefitted enormously from all the excrement hitting the fan elsewhere. President Jalal Talibani has been slowly consolidating power and sidelining potential rivals, whilst at the same time battling to keep a lid on the continued sectarian violence. This strategy of accumulating supremacy is now likely to reap the whirlwind though as Talibani was flown to Germany this week, reportedly in a coma following a stroke. With the strong man gone, the claimants to the throne will be many and Iraq could slip back into anarchy. A bitter result with the 10th anniversary of the invasion coming up in March.

Iran
Little changed in 2012 for Iran except the application of tightened oil sanctions and a lot of slap talk from all sides. 2013 will be a critical year, with President Ahmadinejad set to step down as he is constitutionally forbidden from serving a third consecutive term. Who the mullahs approve to stand in his place will set the tone for the future dialogue on nuclear development and economic rapprochement.
The Gulf
The emirs, kings and petty princelings of the Persian Gulf have weathered the Arab Spring through various ploys, all of them underwritten by the world’s need to keep the oily stuff pumping. Bahrain faced the most serious challenge, with unrest from its large Shi'ite community simmering throughout the year. Constrained geography and the local boys club have enabled Bahrain to deal with the trouble quietly and steadily. Neighbours like the UAE and Kuwait have also backed each other with a “Nothing to see here” attitude. The Gulf States' biggest contribution to the region has been their intensifying support of the more radical elements in the Syrian opposition. This is a time-honoured approach of letting their domestic hot-heads out of the house to go play in someone else’s street.
Israel and Palestine

Another “back to the future” case in the region is Israel and Palestine. Tit-for-tat violence and hardliners of both sides refusing to negotiate with each other’s “criminals and terrorists”. The main change has been the slightly increased status of Palestine in the UN General Assembly, a result not as important for what it brings as in who backed it. In a “So what?” response, Israel announced this week the planning of thousands of new dwelling in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, the latest little increment of expansion. If Joseph and Mary turned up looking for a room in Bethlehem this year, Netanyahu would build them a settlement. But he has his own election to fight very soon.
***
That’s it for this year. Thankyou to all those who have read my column over the months. No doubt there will be plenty to cover again in 2013 and I wish you a happy holiday season in the meantime.
Lynne Newington
Lynne Newington is a Friend of The Conversation.
Researcher
The Jewish community took in Mary MacKillop when she became a refugee [from the church], and contributed generously to Charity sister Fabian Elliott when the order was seeking to build Melboune's St Vincents Private Hospital [again the church refusing to help but lay claim to it when completed], so whatever the need of peace loving Joseph and Mary, a settlement if necessary, wouldn't be out of the question.
Greg MADDEN
Researcher
And what about Turkey? most especially Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's suggestion that "separation of powers was the main obstacle of the government" and the speculation he wants the Presidency to extend his stay in the limelight. Erdogan is resonating with Morsi's beliefs and perhaps Putin too, who was visiting Turkey last week. Most importantly there's been a big surge in investment from the oil rich Gulf countries too. With investment comes influence.
Mat Hardy
Lecturer in Middle East Studies at Deakin University
Greg,
I admit that when I started writing this article I had grander ambitions, Turkey, Tunisia, Algeria etc among the countries slated for inclusion. But the reality of time caught up with me, especially as the kids finished school at 1.30 on Friday and I had to go and get them!
You make a good point about Turkey, which again is a state that has remained relatively stable for decades but now seems to be evolving in a couple of different directions.
Peter Ormonde
Peter Ormonde is a Friend of The Conversation.
Farmer
An excellent romp across the region Mat. Like you say, no shortage of misery.
There's a consequence of the rise of the Islamists - in far more places than you've been able to list, notably across Africa and Pakistan: which is the gradual public exposure of the Gulf States in promoting and supporting fundamentalist medieval notions of Islam all over the Muslim world.
I look forward to that. these feudal despots have been conveniently tolerated and supported for far far too long. They oppress…
Read moreAndrew Wright
logged in via Facebook
Perhaps some comments about Jordan would be appropriate - if the King's authority starts to erode then we are going to see consequences not only for the Israeli-Palestinian relationship but also potential implications for the Gulf States. Also as the probably the most trusted Arab ally of the US and Britain a change here will provide a new quandary for those countries.
Sean Lamb
Science Denier
There is so much cliche and basic lack of knowledge beyond anyone could get from scrutinizing the CNN ticker that is pointless to single out anything in particular. But if a prize for the most ill-informed and laziest statement was to be awarded, it would have to be this: " Russia and China’s intransigence has stopped anything from really happening"
Read moreThere is nothing stopping the US bombing Syria if it wants to, it managed to bomb Serbia and invade Iraq without Russian approval. The Russians in…
Sean Lamb
Science Denier
2011 saw the end of the hunt for Osama bin Laden, 2012 saw the beginning of the hunt for evidence of his genotyping or indeed anything relating to his death.
Read morehttp://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/5061
"Citing the law, The Associated Press asked for files about the raid in more than 20 separate requests, mostly submitted the day after bin Laden's death. The Pentagon told the AP this month it could not locate any photographs or video taken during the raid or showing bin Laden's body. It also said…
Greg MADDEN
Researcher
Me thinks that you protest to much Mr Lamb. On many international matters Russia & China have taken an 'intransigent' amoral stance befitting their political interests, no less so than you accuse America of. A tad lazy not to admit it I think.
Sean Lamb
Science Denier
"Who the mullahs approve to stand in his place will set the tone for the future dialogue on nuclear development and economic rapprochement."
How is it possible to show some much ignorance of Iran? I mean you are paid a handsome wage by the Australian taxpayer for a little bit of teaching and marking and to keep yourself informed about the Middle East - and that is the sum total of your understanding of Iran? You can probably get more depth in an Andrew Bolt column.
Greg Madden, you seem to…
Read moreGreg MADDEN
Researcher
Read more carefully Mr. Lamb. That's exactly my point - you write of Russia's "considerable integrity and good faith" and rattle your sabre at the Americans. There has been no less self-interest in Russia & China's stand on many international issues including this one. As for Matthew Hogans words, it was a brief article done during Xmas week, not a Phd. Get off his back.
Yuri Pannikin
Director
Wha . . .? It's all in 'Zero Dark Thirty', Seany. What more do you want to know?
Anyway, I don't think it happened. It's a conspiracy delivered by Dubya, Cheney, Jews, aliens, Blackwater, Bluewater, Silverchair, and several unidentified members of the military industrial capitalist no-good shootin' tootin' US of A complex!
Rory McGuire
Science commentator
Ok, I will rise to your challenge of commenting on "feckless academics suckling on the public teat".
Read moreNo, I am not against your commentary or our cost supporting you. The Middle East is a grim place and needs all the education and levity it can get; it might help more people understand the situation a little better. My gripe is your use of "suckling". According to the OED suckling is a noun or a verb. If a noun it means an unweaned animal, ie one still sucking (no "l") at its mother's teat. In this…
Mat Hardy
Lecturer in Middle East Studies at Deakin University
Rory,
I'll never use suckling again lightly! But my OED says that "to suckle" is a verb transitive to feed or nourish from the breast or udder or intransitive "feed by sucking the breast". Would that not mean is correct to conjugate it to 'suckling' when referring to a group drawing sustenance from a maternal mammary?
"Sucking" is more general and has no specific breast implications. eg. we say that babies are suckling at a nipple but sucking at a bottle.
Thanks for the interesting nitpick!
My guess on the Iran thing is that Sean is referring to the fact that Iran has electoral mechanisms, so when I talk about the mullahs installing a president I am showing my ignorance. But nobody even gets to be a presidential candidate without the nod from the Guardian Council, and of course there were plenty of questions at the last election over the legitimacy of the poll returns. ie. the election was rigged to show less support for the 'reform' candidate than was truly there.
Don Butler
Don Butler is a Friend of The Conversation.
Paediatrician
Greg
The ongoing persistent Israeli Palestinian conflict seems illogical unless it is seen as a way of empowering groups who benefit from conflict. The present actors on both sides would be sidelined politically if peace broke out. The reasons given for continuing the conflict seem weak and often illogical. The arguments seem to be directed to the hot heads on both sides or pressuring Washington.
I have concluded that the political leaders in the area do not want peace. Therefore persistent low grade conflict will continue for years, the worry is that the power brokers may lose control and the conflict may get out of control. For the rest of us if Iran became involved it could be interesting.
I wish commentators would emphasise more the role elites have in entrenching their power at the cost of everyone else.
Greg MADDEN
Researcher
In the Middle East different kinds of elitism collide like the tectonic plates - there's the elitism of people who believe they follow the one true faith, the elitism of citizenship in places like AbuDhabi, the elitism of masculinity and of the clerics and scholars, the born to rule elitism of the wealthy. And for all these elites their honor is so easily offended. Lurking beneath the surface of all these self righteous elitisms is pigheadedness, blaming, lack of empathy and a belief in over the top, severe punishment for the opponent. Anybody with an opposing viewpoint is forced to be obsequious or to match their opponents vehemence. The art of diplomacy is very weak. It will need some great leaders to break through the the ingrained paradigm of belief, honor and people management.