How your resolution to exercise more this year could be a recipe for injury

If I’m honest, I never really liked running, but every new year when I was in high school, I made the resolution to try out for the track team. We started training before snow was off the streets of Detroit by “running the stairs” – run down the hall, up three flights of stairs, back down the hall, down…

M5mhghh8-1355961268
Just like clothing or food, exercise goes through fashions. Alison/Flickr

If I’m honest, I never really liked running, but every new year when I was in high school, I made the resolution to try out for the track team. We started training before snow was off the streets of Detroit by “running the stairs” – run down the hall, up three flights of stairs, back down the hall, down three flights.

They worked us hard and within a couple of weeks every one of us was hobbling around with shin splints.

We all recovered, but we clearly had an effective recipe for injury. What we didn’t know was that our shin splints were actually the early stages of stress fractures.

Most research into exercise-induced injuries involve military recruits who undergo intense exercise in their basic training. Injury rates in this group can be over 35%, but they’re highly variable and dependent on the training regime, as well as the level and type of previous exercise.

It’s not necessarily the intensity of exercise that seems to produce injuries. Rather injuries are more likely with a change in intensity or loading.

First peak for injuries

It might be expected that the frequency of injury would decline with time after the load increased, but this in not necessarily the case. Rather, there are two peak times for injury – one in the first two weeks and one in the period between eight and 11 weeks.

Changes in exercise intensity or loading lead to more injuries rellim

The first peak includes a high incidence of stress fractures, just like in my high school story. Bones get stronger and re-model in response to increased exercise, but the process takes time. Increased load produces stress on the bone and stimulates remodelling to build up bone strength.

The process of remodelling begins with re-absorption of old bone and results in the temporary weakening of the total bone structure. If the same high level of loading is repeated, then the weakened bone can be stressed and possibly even damaged. And this leads to a downward spiral that can culminate in a stress fracture.

Similar processes occur for other systems of the body, where the very loading that stimulates the capacity of a tissue to increase, frequently also results in a transient reduction in tissue strength.

Second peak

It’s the second peak of injury – at two to three months – that’s more reminiscent of many of the injuries we see in clinical practice. To understand this peak, we need to consider how the body responds to exercise. Allowing for the effects of age, disease or accident, generally if we keep doing what we’re doing we will maintain our capacity.

If we reduce the challenges in a particular area, its capacity reduces; increase the challenges, and capacity increases. So, for example, if your goal is more strength and muscle bulk, then high muscle load is necessary. If your goal is endurance, duration of exercise is important. For improving bone density, the activity needs to load the bones. To increase cardiovascular capacity, the cardiovascular system needs to be challenged.

Connective tissues take longer than muscles to respond to exercise kazuhiro kimura

Exercise is often thought of as having an effect on muscle strength and cardiovascular capability, so we build up our activity levels as our strength and cardiovascular fitness improves. Effective strength can increase within minutes or days due to neurological adaptations while actual muscle strength starts to increase within two weeks. Similarly, cardiovascular fitness starts to increase within three weeks.

Connective tissues such as tendons and ligaments also strengthen in response to load. Although their response is more rapid than bones, connective tissues respond much more slowly than muscles with changes only starting to occur over a period of months.

When we use our newfound muscular and cardiovascular capacity to ramp up the exercise load, the load is also increased on the other structures that haven’t had time to remodel. It’s typically these connective tissues, such as tendons and ligaments, where injuries start to occur after six or eight weeks of exercise.

A recipe for injury

Say you want to produce an injury. Start with a new type of exercise with plenty of speed, impact, and fatigue. Increase hard and fast, and add in some awkward positions and near maximal loads. Alternatively, be pushed by a friend or personal trainer who you trust against your better judgement.

Continue for a month or so. As you’re starting to have a better cardiovascular response and feel stronger, ramp up the intensity to tolerance.

The tendons and ligaments that haven’t built up yet can then be expected to start to break down. The tissues are subjected to the downward spiral of structural stress, reduced integrity prior to remodelling, more stress on weakened structures – your injury is ready.

Ramping up exercise intensity too quickly is a recipe for injury Brian Sørensen

Just like clothing or food, exercise goes through fashions. In the 1980s, it was aerobics. When the injury rates as high as 58% to 66% were recognised, low impact aerobics were introduced and the injury rates dropped somewhat.

Today, there are a wide variety of fashionable exercises some of which follow the recipe for injury even more closely than aerobics. Look for these elements: an unfamiliar type of exercise, repeated high levels of impact or high levels of effort, particularly those performed at high speed in unusual or awkward positions, continue when fatigued. Repeat frequently, don’t allow time for recovery and keep increasing as tolerated.

A cautionary tale

A man in his late 60s came to see me recently. He and his wife had started boot camp-type exercises twice a week about six weeks previously. The exercise program was such that they would just be recovering from the pain after their previous workout when it was time for the next one.

In the previous week, he had developed three separate problems – tennis elbow, a rotator cuff problem and knee pain. He asked me if I thought he was doing too much. Once he said the question out loud, I didn’t need to answer him and he didn’t end up needing any specific treatment. He just needed to back off and apply a common sense approach rather than his following his previous recipe for injury.

So, is “no pain, no gain” a recipe for injury? Not on its own and probably not for highly trained individuals who have built up to their level of exercise. But for the rest of us, more is not necessarily better.

Returning to that new year’s resolution. Perhaps the pain is not essential and, for most of us, a motto of “no brain, no gain” might be more appropriate.

Articles also by This Author

Sign in to Favourite

Want to follow The Conversation?

Sign up to our free newsletter to get the day's top stories in your inbox each morning, with a special wrap on Saturday.

Donate and become a friend of The Conversation

Join the conversation

10 Comments sorted by

  1. Stephen Prowse

    CEO at Wound CRC

    This article gives an important message but perhaps it is given the wrong way round! With many of us desk bound sitting before a computer screen, exercise is more important than ever. This article seems to provide an excuse to opt out rather than guidance and encouragement to commence or continue.

    report
    1. Neil Tuttle

      Musculoskeletal Physiotherapist & Senior Lecturer at Griffith University

      In reply to Stephen Prowse

      Thanks Stephen, the intention was certainly not to give any excuse to not be active (I intentionaly use the term activity rather than exercise) as there is no question that most of us would benefit from more activity. A recent review provides some quantification of what is useful (http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21694556).
      The intention was more to reduce another excuse - that of an injury following inappropriate exercise.

      report
    2. Tim Klar

      Tim Klar is a Friend of The Conversation.

      logged in via LinkedIn

      In reply to Stephen Prowse

      Stephen, I interpreted Neil's article to suggest that it's as much about discernment as dedication when entering into a new/return-to exercise program. As one of the desk-bound types with a new year's resolution to return to physical activity, I am reminded by this article to modulate my choice of activity/intensity/duration etc with an awareness of my current state, the need for recovery and (perhaps most importantly) my age!

      If I had anything to echo in Neil's article, it's that counsel from a reliable soft tissue therapist can often be just as important an investment as a gym membership or personal trainer.

      report
  2. Gary Cassidy

    Thanks for a great article.

    Most exercise programs are goal based with the expectation of continuous "progression". With such a paradigm you go and flog yourself at the gym or on the pavement and don't bother with a low intensity walk or gym session (because of the perception that there will be minimal progression). Goal based programs may be optimal for athletes but for the average Joe they invariable follow your recipe for injury.

    I think a more sensible approach would be a journey based exercise program where you listen to your body - workout hard when you feel great take it easy when you feel tired or have a few niggles (even over a period of weeks or months), and somewhere in between most of the time.

    And remember that the very best exercise program anywhere in the world is consistency over years and years - be the turtle and not the hare!

    report
    1. Roger Carter

      logged in via Facebook

      In reply to Gary Cassidy

      Gary's advice is spot on. From many years of personal experimentation and study, I am convinced that the average personal trainer will have no hope of correctly supervising an unfit or older persons exercise regime. They just don't learn enough unless they are very highly qualified or very experienced.
      I am 61 and very fit for my age, but I only stay mobile with a lifetime of accumulated knowledge of what my body can and cannot do. Most important is when to back off! There are a growing number of properly qualified exercise physiologists being trained in Australia now. This a demanding university level qualification, a far cry from the 6 month and 12 month TAFE courses so many personal trainers get by on.
      If I was an unfit or older person and trying to start exercise I would find one of these properly trained professionals to get me going. I have learned from bitter experience that avoiding injury is the number one priority.

      report
  3. Paul Rogers

    logged in via Twitter

    I'm somewhat horrified at what some personal trainers do at bootcamps with participants of mixed fitness and experience. Your example of the older man thrown into bootcamp twice a week with little progression is a perfect example.

    Rotator cuff injuries are notorious in older men working shoulder joints hard, more or less, for the first time. These take 12 months to resolve for some people.

    I'm also wary of trainees jumping in to CrossFit type training without progression. One hopes the trainers are well trained!

    report
  4. Peter Shillito

    Mr.

    Thanks for a great article, one that I relate to personally. I used to be quite fit up to middle age (squash, running etc.) but now at 58 I'm desk bound, overweight and struggling with painful soft tissue injuries every time I try and exercise. Any suggestions as to programs, types of exercise, gyms etc. that might be suitable for my rapidly deteriorating body? Where can I find a very highly qualified and experienced PT that has the smarts to get me safely moving instead of bruising?

    report
    1. Neil Tuttle

      Musculoskeletal Physiotherapist & Senior Lecturer at Griffith University

      In reply to Peter Shillito

      Thanks Peter
      This is a very good question and not an easy one to answer. There are several elements that I would suggest:
      Qualifications: an Exercise Physiologist or Physiotherapist particularly with experience in an area such as cardiac rehabilitation. They should be able to screen for any other risk factors and look at options for activities or exercise.
      Word of mouth: a useful starting point, but is not foolproof. There is little correlation for example between patient satisfaction and positive…

      Read more
  5. Tim Scanlon

    Debunker

    There are several golden rules about exercise, none more relevant than this: The first week of January is when people take a break from exercise, they come back on the second week when the New Year Resolution crowd have given up for the year.

    report
  6. Anthony Peter Moss

    Project Officer

    Exercise that develops and changes gradually over time to cater for increased ability and capacity is the ideal. The Canadian Air force Exercise programme from the 60s is an excellent example of this, although some of its exercises at the more advanced stages are rightly now considered potentially injurious to backs. Still, the advice given there beneficially focuses on exercising slowly, taking time to get used to the level, never overdoing the exercise stress and only progressing when ready.

    By way of comparison, there seems to be a trend in exercise magazines and websites for promoting exercise regimes like high intensity interval training, involving quick bursts of high energy physical work, very athletic and demanding. The emphasis there is on getting results sooner rather than later.

    report