The number of Australians who were homeless on census night increased by 17% to 105,237 in the five years to August 2011. When adjusted for population growth, the increase the increase is still worryingly high, at around 8%. It’s clear we need a stronger commitment to address this significant social issue.
The census data, released this week by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), continues to shatter the stereotype of homelessness: the middle-aged alcoholic or drug-addicted man sleeping in a park.
Rather, 60% of people experiencing homelessness were under 35 years old, and an incredible 17% were aged under ten. The ABS acknowledges that census methodology is likely to underestimate youth homelessness, so the number is probably higher than the estimated 44,083 Australians under 25 currently recognised as homelessness.
As subsequent research from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare shows, these young people will be more likely to be involved in child protection and juvenile justice services, further entrenching their disadvantage.
Almost half (44%) of homeless Australians were women; with women and children the fastest growing group seeking assistance from specialist homelessness services. This number, however, does not include women and children remaining in unsafe housing and continuing violent relationships. The ABS recognises that data sources other than the census must be used to better understand the incidence of family violence and the consequences on housing security and homelessness.
In welcome news, the number of people “sleeping rough” (in improvised dwellings, tents or sleeping out) decreased from 7,247 in 2006 to 6,813 in 2011. But more people are sheltered in such substandard overcrowded housing as to warrant being classed as being homeless; this group increased from 31,531 in 2006 to 41,390 in 2011.
The homelessness rate grew by more than 20% in New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania, with a gob-smacking 70% rise in the ACT. Meanwhile, the largest fall was in the Northern Territory, which still has (by far) the highest proportion of people experiencing homelessness (731 people per 100,000 population, compared with a national average of 48.9).
The ABS has acknowledged it has further work to do to understand and measure homelessness experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which goes a long way to explaining the NT’s massive homelessness rates.
The ABS report has been the subject of significant media coverage, much of it couched in terms of the failure of governments to reduce homelessness. But given the social and economic changes since 2006, it’s surprising that the growth wasn’t higher.
Rather than whacking governments, the ABS data shows a need for governments to continue their efforts to address homelessness.

Committing to end homelessness
The Commonwealth’s 2008 white paper on homelessness, The Road Home, boldly aims to halve homelessness by 2020 and offer accommodation to all rough sleepers. Similarly, states and territories have introduced bold and targeted action plans to address homelessness.
These commitments have been underpinned by important agreements between the Commonwealth and the states and territories. The National Affordable Housing Agreement (NAHA) focuses on early intervention and prevention strategies, better assistance for people with multiple support needs, and providing ongoing assistance to ensure stability for clients post-crisis. The National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness (NPAH) outlines funding arrangements for specific projects and commits partners to addressing agreed outcomes through program delivery.
But these agreements end in June 2013, making the next few months a vital time for the agreements to be renegotiated. At his address to the National Press Club this week, Housing Minister Brendan O’Connor committed to providing half the funds required for another year while the NPAH is renegotiated.
The states are yet to meet this commitment and are seeking additional resources from the Commonwealth. Details will be discussed at today’s meeting of housing ministers in Brisbane.
In addition to resourcing, more work needs to be done to ensure homelessness services are sufficiently funded and effectively delivered. To achieve this, we need to establish a monitoring system with nationally consistent, evidence-based measures to assess the effectiveness of homelessness services. This will allow us to focus on the outcomes of people experiencing or at risk of homelessness, rather than just on the number of people being provided with services.
As the ABS figures show, homelessness continues to be a social crisis in Australia today. Governments, and the broader community, must redouble their commitments to address, and ultimately end, this significant social policy challenge.
Ian Donald Lowe
Seeker of Truth
The numbers you quote don't make any sense at all. What are you defining as homeless, only those who are sleeping rough? There are many other forms of homelessness, from staying with friends or relatives to sleeping in a vehicle or tent or sleeping in a hostel.
How does someone sleeping rough submit a census form anyway? This is one of the big flaws as many of those sleeping rough would not be counted at all in any census as they are outside the system. Relying on ABS numbers in this regard is not going to get you anywhere. BS in = BS out.
Jenn Dunkley
Residential Youth Worker
The ABS made a major effort at the time of the most rceent census to go out and count the number of Rough Sleepers, at least in the ACT. I was & am still working within a specialist homelessness service here in the ACT, and saw just how 'hands on' the ABS got this time round with working to count all sorts of people who were not counted ever before - with the result that the numbers were higher (particularly for the ACT).
Dale Bloom
Analyst
"Youth unemployment has soared 80 per cent in the 20 to 24-year age group since the start of the economic downturn, rising from 4.5 per cent in June 2008 to 8.1 per cent in June this year.
At the same time, the number of foreigners with work rights, but not permanent residency, has grown 4 per cent.
Professor Birrell says too many foreign workers are competing against young Australians for first-time jobs - such as stacking supermarket shelves, retail sales or cleaning - in the big cities."
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/student-visas-used-as-back-door-by-foreign-workers-says-monash-university-study/story-e6frg6n6-1226516962190
In many areas, few people will get accommodation unless they have a job.
Due to the insanity of our immigration policies, Australia could end up with high levels of youth unemployment and high levels of youth homelessness.
Judith Olney
Ms
Dale I agree with Professor Birrell, and yourself, on this subject. I think there are far too many working visas given to young people from overseas, and this needs to be addressed. I ran a backpackers hostel in a country town, and saw how backpackers were directly competing for jobs while young people that lived in the town and surrounding area didn't even get a look in.
The problem is that many of the local farms and businesses, would only hire backpackers, and would do so through agencies…
Read moreDale Bloom
Analyst
Judith Olney,
I would agree with the working visas and the backpackers. I know of some who actually plan on leaving Australia to visit another country as a part of their “Christmas holidays”.
The concern is that young Australians can’t get a job, and then they begin to give up and have no motivation left.
It seems that there are backpackers who want work so that they can extend their visas and stay in the country longer, but certain government authorities are now telling them they have to find work in “regional areas”
But the regional areas usually have higher youth unemployment than the cities, (although much of the money in cities is usually grabbed from the surrounding rural areas), and this compounds the problem for regional Australian youth to find work and earn some money.
Of course anyone who finds the situation objectionable could be labelled “racist” or some other term, so few speak out about it.
Andrew Smith
Education Consultant at Australian & International Education Centre
Appears Dr. Bob Birrell is "cherry picking" data or does not understand basic statistics (which is unlikely) as he ignores British, Irish and European working holiday visa makers, and downward trends of international students (plus basic fact that one cannot work on a tourist visa and employers face harsh penalties)
Student visa numbers have been plummeting since a peak in 2008/09 while working holiday visas have risen sharply e.g. Irish, British and other eligible backpackers from countries with…
Read more