With increasing pressure on Australia’s water resources, many have looked to northern Australia to provide water for agriculture, urban development and other human needs.
Much of northern Australia is in the wet-dry tropics, which stretch from north Queensland through to the Kimberley in Western Australia. This area has one of the largest concentrations of free-flowing rivers in the world. The climate is characterised by a long, hot dry season with little or no rain, and intense flooding rains for a few months in the wet season.
These extremes of climate result in a unique suite of animals and plants that have adapted to survive and flourish in this environment.
About 60% of Australia’s surface water runoff occurs in northern Australia. Recent media stories have highlighted the potential economic and social benefits of developing irrigated agriculture in the wet-dry tropics. Indeed, the federal Regional Development Minister Simon Crean is quoted as saying that there is “plenty of water there that is all now going to waste” (The Australian, Inquirer, October 6-7 page 21). This statement, typical of those voiced by politicians keen to develop northern Australia, is a fallacy and reflects a lack of understanding of how rivers and estuaries in northern Australia work.
Many rivers in the wet-dry tropics reduce to a series of disconnected waterholes in the dry season, with estuaries receiving little or no freshwater. These waterholes become important refuges for many species such as fish (iconic species such as barramundi and sawfish), crustaceans and birds. Water extraction from these rivers for irrigation and other agricultural needs could, if not done sustainably, affect the numbers and kinds of species in these waterholes.
The wet season transforms the landscape. Heavy rainfall causes large-scale flooding, particularly in areas that are low lying and flat. The rivers swell and overflow their banks, creating huge floodplains across vast inland areas and saltflats near the sea.
These floodplains provide a critical food source for fish and crustaceans as they move out onto the floodplain. Fish fatten and breed here, and migrate their length to get suitable food and breeding sites. Extracting water for irrigation, or building on-river dams, will affect fish migration, food availability and breeding. This will affect recreational and commercial fishing downstream.
Dams also fragment river-estuarine systems which rely on the transport of sediment and nutrients downstream, ultimately reducing the productivity of estuaries and coastal areas. So the use of off-channel, rather than on-channel dams is an important component of ensuring that agricultural development minimises impacts.
As the floodwaters drain after the wet season, large volumes of water, and associated nutrients, flow into the sea via estuaries. Salinity drops.
This is a cue for species such as the commercially important banana prawn, which cannot tolerate low salinity, to move out of the estuaries and into deeper waters with higher salinity. Commercial fishers take advantage of this movement, harvesting banana prawns offshore.
The Northern prawn fishery is substantial – in 2002, the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics valued it at $165 million. In some areas, such as the Gulf of Carpentaria, the scale of the freshwater flow is used as a predictor of the scale of the banana prawn catch in the offshore fishery. So, the bigger the flood, the bigger the catch.
Substantially reducing the volumes of flow downstream by extracting water for irrigation, or regulating the flow by damming rivers is very likely to reduce catches of banana prawns.
The benefits of extracting water for irrigated agriculture need to be weighed up against the benefits of recreational and commercial fisheries, and maintaining the inherent value of these ecosystems.
Our northern wet-dry tropical rivers and estuaries are unique habitats that have remained relatively unchanged. The animals and plants are highly adapted to the extremes of climate between the dry and wet seasons, and vulnerable to any future changes due to human impact. Human activities such as water extraction, and dam building for irrigation, can have substantial impacts on both the ecosystems and humans, reducing the environmental, social and economic values of these systems.
Maintaining the natural flow, and ensuring thresholds of water availability, is critical for both the health and sustainability of rivers and estuaries. Managing these systems in the future needs to examine the trade-offs between environmental, social and economic needs.
Comment removed by moderator.
Tim Scanlon
Debunker
But does wildlife vote?
In seriousness though, I'm not a fan of irrigated agriculture, because it is a way of growing crops not suited to an environment. As such I'm very wary of development schemes for northern Australia.
My question relates to the way climate change has been increasing rainfall in the north, especially in Western Australia as tropical moisture is more prevalent due to warming of the Indian Ocean. With this increased water is there a marriage that can occur with agriculture and the environment in the north? I'm guessing the answer is no, as the dry season still dominates and the wet season is too intense for rainfed systems, thus dams would still be doing damage to the waterways.
Michael Hay
retired
Surely there is room for discussion on this subject of northern water. Comments seem to come from fixed views, with room for compromise or new thoughts.
1. Is there not an adequate rainfall which could be harvested by water storages NOT built on a major river ?
2. Is there not scope for the turning of the east-flowing rivers in Queensland (which ,we are told so often, seriously pollute the Great Barrier Reef and will, sooner or later cause its extinction) so that their floods may be used in the hinterland, allowing their normal flows to still feed the sea off the Queensland coast ?
3. Is their NO WAY of collecting the monsoonal flows and the fluid dropped in a tropical cyclone, without hindering the ecosystems indigenous to the area ?
4.
Tim Scanlon
Debunker
Mike, the answer is pretty much no to all three.
The big problem with water storages in the north of WA and NT is that they are based upon intermittent and deluge patterns. Thus, waterways are not formed in the same way as they are in more southern areas. You get examples like the Ord river, which people then want to dam, because it is reliable.
So any water harvesting will have environmental impacts downstream, or is likely to be damaged during rain events (just look at the roads that get washed out each year in the north).
This is why I was hoping Michele might comment on the change in pattern and type of rainfall experienced in the north. Since it has had an increase in rainfall, I'm wondering if the type of rainfall has changed which would allow collection areas (rather than river dams).
Pawan Pandita
logged in via Facebook
Australian Government has established the Northern Australia Water Futures Assessment (the assessment) to provide the science needed to inform the development and protection of Northern Australia’s water resources, so that development is ecologically, culturally and economically sustainable.
Greg Boyles
Lanscaper and former medical scientist
Our population size needs to be managed sustainably along with our immigration intake so that we have no need of 'developing' the tropical north.
Which, as I understand it, is profoundly unsuited to conventional agriculture anyway.
John Harland
bicycle technician
The Gordon River in Tasmania was water flowing to waste.
Keith Thomas
Retired
No river water "flows to waste". A river is a dynamic ecosystem within a series of larger ecosystems. You might as well say "a tree growing to waste", "a coral reef forming to waste". And rivers have an impact on the ecosystem of the outfall - see the impact on the GBR of fertiliser washed down by rivers.
Rivers are not merely drains or channels, taking water from somewhere or to somewhere that humans find inconvenient/convenient.