Glyn Davis lays out the evidence (or lack thereof) for the argument that free speech on campuses is at risk.
L’expertise universitaire, l’exigence journalistique
Articles sur Free speech
Affichage de 181 à 200 de 317 articles
The University of Reading wrongly judged that Geras’ essay, which discusses political violence, might fall foul of the government’s Prevent strategy.
There’s no evidence we have a problem with free speech on our campuses. The free speech inquiry is expensive and unnecessary.
Begun as part of efforts to preserve online anonymity and privacy, Freenet, Tor and the Invisible Internet Project are, like the rest of the web, home to both crime and free expression.
Universities should very rarely prevent controversial speakers from spreading their message.
Milton’s famous defence of free speech, Areopagitica, was a strange choice for the attorney general.
Is controversy extremist? The Charity Commission seems to think so.
The Ford government in Ontario is taking aim at free speech on the province’s campuses. But is it addressing a problem that doesn’t exist?
Chelsea Manning’s disclosures on the Iraq war were major milestones in the emergence of the digital age whistleblower.
While they may talk about ‘free speech,’ businesses make decisions about their content based on a very different set of principles.
On the one-year anniversary of the tragedy in Charlottesville, we asked the presidents of Bowdoin, Elon and the University of Washington whether free speech should be treated differently on campus.
Judge’s decision means the media cannot identify a suspect until they are arrested. This may be challenged on appeal.
A US gun rights advocate has won the right to publish instructions on the web for 3D printing firearms. In an era where anyone can access a 3D printer, is this the end of gun control?
Free speech may protect offensive speech, but we degrade this central right when we see it as simply the right to offend, regardless of the impact on others.
Jordan Peterson’s lawsuit against Laurier is hardly the action of a free speech advocate. Here’s how he resembles Cleon of ancient Greece.
Though free speech on campus is often a divisive issue, solutions are not hard to find, a First Amendment scholar argues.
A Twitter account used for official purposes is a public forum protected by the First Amendment, a federal appeals court has ruled.
Most people know that the First Amendment protects free speech. But two upcoming Supreme Court cases reveal how it also gives people in the US the right not to speak.
In new guidance, students and universities could be banned from censoring controversial speakers on campuses following the first ministerial intervention on free speech in 30 years.
Despite calls for their ouster, public university professors who utter offensive things enjoy free speech protection. But a scholar argues for another way to respond to what those professors say.
Les contributeurs les plus fréquents
-
Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Advancing Journalism, The University of Melbourne
-
Professor Emeritus of Communication and Rhetorical Studies, Syracuse University
-
Professor of Politics and Public Policy, The University of Queensland
-
Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Wayne State University
-
Deputy Director, Institute for Ethics, Governance & Law, Griffith University
-
Brechner Eminent Scholar in Mass Communication, University of Florida
-
Professor of Law; Kim Santow Chair of Law and Social Justice, University of Sydney
-
Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra
-
Professor of Law, Queen Mary University of London
-
Emeritus Professor of Sociology, University of Technology Sydney
-
Professor of Law, University of Dayton
-
Lecturer in Political Theory and Philosophy, Queen's University Belfast
-
Professor of Higher Education, University of Kentucky
-
Lecturer, School of Law, University of Aberdeen
-
Associate Professor of Hip-Hop, University of Virginia
