The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report, authored by 209 lead authors, 50 review editors from 39 countries, and by more than 600 contributing authors from 32 countries, with feedback from many hundreds of reviewers, is an authoritative summary of the scientific peer reviewed literature relating to climate science, global warming and future trends in the atmosphere-ocean system.
It is a document humanity can only ignore at its own peril.
Mean global warming of the atmosphere since 1850 reached about 0.9C (above pre-industrial). This translates to mean warming over the continents of about 1.5C and during 1986-2005 over 3C in polar regions. Once the masking effect of sulphur aerosols is discounted, the mean global climate has already exceeded 2C (see Figure 2).
Warming of the ocean accounts for more than 90% of the extra energy absorbed by Earth during 1971-2010. The warming is directly related to the rise in radiative forcing/energy of the Earth system (see Figures 1 and 2). Temperature increases in ocean depths above 700m and below 700m are shown in Figure 3.
The AR5 report exposes the myth global warming has halted over the last 20 years or so. A combination of rising sulphur aerosol emissions from around 2001, a decline in sunspot activity and La-Nina events resulted in a relative lull in warming, while peak temperatures were reached in 2005 and 2010 and warming of the oceans continued (see Figure 3)1.
AR5 future climate projections may convey an impression future temperature rise can be expressed by smooth or gradual trajectories, as in Figure 1. Such a gradual rise might allow sufficient time to mitigate further warming. But the role of sulphur dioxide emissions in mitigating future temperature rise depends on industrial practices and thus remains unclear. Reduction in sulphur emissions associated with clean air policies resulted in temperature spikes about 1975, which could happen again.
The extreme rates of global warming experienced since about 1975 result in feedback effects from warming oceans, drying land sectors, release of methane from permafrost and Arctic lakes and release of CO2 from fires. A continuation of these processes is bound to bring on a synergy of warming processes and potential irreversible tipping points in the climate system.
The rate at which climate forcing (change in energy/heat) in the atmosphere/ocean/cryosphere system rose between 1850-2005 (about 0.01 Watt/m2/year) is more than an order of magnitude faster than during the last glacial termination 17,000 – 10,000 years ago (about 0.00045 Watt/m2/year).
The lesson from the history of the atmosphere/ocean system is that abrupt climate changes at rates such as at present resulted in mass extinction of species. According to Kevin Trenberth, chief scientist of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado:
Some of the human-induced changes are occurring 100 times faster than they occur in nature … And this is one of the things that worries me more than climate change itself. It’s actually the rate of change that’s most worrying… Ecosystems are not prepared for this jolt … And neither are many human endeavors, built around assumptions about how hot it’s going to be, how much it’s going to rain on our croplands, and how high the seas will rise.
The AR5 report says CO2 or CH4 release from thawing permafrost to 2010 are in the range of 33–400 gigatonnes. But not enough focus is drawn to this factor. David Wasdell, Director of the Meridian Institute, made this point earlier, stating:
The Feedback Crisis in Climate Change highlights the all-too-real possibility of runaway climate change, driven by the naturally occurring positive feedback loops of the biosphere. It raises issues of the most fundamental and urgent nature for the world community and calls in question the effectiveness of current strategic responses to global warming.“
The role of fire as a major feedback to global warming has not received enough focus in the AR5 report. According to Professor of Environmental Change Biology, David Bowman, natural and anthropogenic forest and bushfires release 2 to 4 gigatonnes of carbon per year.
He says, "Currently all sources of fire (landscape biomass) cause CO2 emissions equal to 50% of those stemming from fossil-fuel combustion (2 to 4 PgC year−1 versus 7.2 PgC year−1)”. With rising temperatures, a distinction between “natural” and “anthropogenic” fires is obscured. The AR5’s absence of focus on fire as a major feedback remains inexplicable.
Climate change in the 20th and 21st centuries constitutes an unprecedented event horizon - a shift of state in the terrestrial atmosphere. In a new paper Hansen et al state “Burning all fossil fuels, we conclude, would make most of the planet uninhabitable by humans, thus calling into question strategies that emphasize adaptation to climate change.”
No amount of media and internet spin can alter the essential evidence for runaway climate change presented by the AR5 report, nor the consequences for future generations and nature. Even before publication of the AR5 a loud chorus of critics emerged all over the media, none of whom are raising any valid scientific points.
As pointed out by Andy Pitman, those who deny the science will not indicate which evidence will convince them climate science and the IPCC are essentially correct. But for the rest of us, ignoring the evidence of AR5 would be imprudent in the extreme.
Good planets are hard to come by.
1 The negative radiative forcing of sulphur aerosols as shown in Figure 3 is in the range of -0.23 to -0.77 Watt/m2 for direct aerosol effects and -0.55 Watt/m2 for cloud aerosol effects. When combined the forcings are in the range of -0.78 to -1.32 Watt/m2.
According to the accepted mean climate sensitivity of 3C per doubling of CO2, then ¾ of the radiative forcing translates to temperatures in degrees C, the negative temperature effect of aerosols (combined direct and aerosol cloud effects = -0.78 to -1.32 Watt/m2) correlates with -0.58 degrees C to -0.99 degrees C
When this is added to the continental warming of +1.5 degrees C the mean global continental temperature anomaly exceeds 2C. The reference for climate sensitivity is to Hansen et al. 2013