Menu Close

Dark Money

Report: government won’t rule out underwriting Adani’s Carmichael coal mine

Gautam Adani’s company is in line to get an extraordinary helping hand from Malcolm Turnbull’s government to develop the Carmichael coal mine. Mick Tsikas/AAP

Is the government secretly planning to put taxpayers on the hook to build the world’s biggest new thermal coal mine? It is refusing to rule it out.

Until now, speculation has centred on a A$1 billion discount loan from the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility (NAIF) to Indian billionaire Gautam Adani to build a rail line from the Galilee Basin to Abbot Point on the Queensland coast. This is a “cart before the horse” proposition, however. There can be no rail line without a mining project, and Adani is yet to attract project finance from commercial banks to build its mine.

A new report by the Australian Conservation Foundation notes that a number of approaches were made to the federal government and its credit agency, Export Finance and Insurance Corporation (EFIC), asking whether the agency was considering supporting the Carmichael thermal coal project. EFIC already has a team working with NAIF on project evaluation.

Detailed questions were put to the minister for trade, tourism and investment, Stephen Ciobo, whose portfolio oversees EFIC, and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). There was no response.

EFIC and NAIF were also contacted by the author, who conducted an investigation for the ACF into the NAIF board. NAIF did not respond at all. EFIC directed questions to NAIF and DFAT, both of which declined to respond.

It is within EFIC’s legal framework to finance export projects – either by guaranteeing or insuring their loans. Adani Mining, the local offshoot of an Indian conglomerate, is eligible under the EFIC legislation for government assistance.

EFIC acts at the instruction of the minister, in this case the Queenslander Stephen Ciobo. Adani Mining is registered in Australia. It is an exporter and EFIC has a track record of financing large fossil fuel projects.

The ACF report, Dirty Deeds, Done for Cheap Dirt, notes that EFIC – despite its mandate to support small and medium-sized exporters – has a track record in making sizeable investments in large fossil fuel projects:

It is currently considering a deal to finance the 12 million tonnes per annum Boikarabelo coal mine and railway in South Africa, ironically a project closer by ship to India than Adani’s Carmichael and one that will directly compete with Australian exports in a declining Indian market for seaborne coal imports.

In 2014, more than three-quarters of the $576.7 million worth of transactions signed by EFIC went to just three parties: a Chilean company that runs the biggest copper mine in the world, a construction giant listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, and a billion-dollar Belgian smelting group.

Even with the support of EFIC, though, Adani requires project finance to develop its Carmichael mine. Adani’s lead banker, Commonwealth Bank, parted ways with Adani in 2015.

Due to public pressure from environment groups and the poor financial prospects for the project, Adani has had trouble attracting interest from commercial banks internationally. The world market for seaborne thermal coal exports is in decline and India is on target to phase out imports by 2021, so the project does not appear to make commercial sense. Futures prices for Newcastle thermal coal, generally of superior quality to Carmichael coal, languish at $US68 per metric tonne, a level at which the mine is unprofitable.

But if the federal government were to provide loan insurance or loan guarantees to a commercial banking syndicate, the banks might be more inclined to fund Adani. Australian taxpayers, however, would then be at risk for the estimated $10 billion in project finance. That’s on top of the concessional loan from NAIF, which is yet to be approved, of $1 billion for the rail line.

ACF chief executive Kelly O'Shanassy said yesterday that it was an outrageous idea that “public money could be put on the line to protect private profit from the Adani coal mine that will help destroy the [Great Barrier] Reef and Australian tourism jobs”.

The report also found the NAIF board is stacked with resource industry directors, past and present. Despite its mandate to invest in a wide range of infrastructure, including communications, transport, airports, education and renewable energy, the board’s expertise is heavily skewed towards mining and coal.

The NAIF investment mandate is also vague and its operations are shrouded in secrecy compared with other government financiers such as EFIC and the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC). Yet is has $5 billion of taxpayers’ money at its disposal.

The minister in charge of NAIF is Matt Canavan who, as minister for resources and northern Australia, is a vocal advocate for coal-fired power plants. He has announced that coal projects are also eligible for NAIF funding.

Even with the enthusiastic support of both the Australian and Queensland governments, the Carmichael project is highly unpopular. Nonetheless, the Queensland government has granted the project an unlimited water licence.

Adani has also been negotiating with the Queensland government for a royalties break. The company announced this week that it would be postponing its final investment decision on Carmichael until the state provided “clarity” on lower or deferred royalties.

This column, co-published by The Conversation with, is part of the Democracy Futures series, a joint global initiative between The Conversation and the Sydney Democracy Network. The project aims to stimulate fresh thinking about the many challenges facing democracies in the 21st century.

Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 171,100 academics and researchers from 4,742 institutions.

Register now