These donors can experience an emotional release by channeling their feelings into something they consider positive.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Displaying 21 - 40 of 46 articles
Justice Samuel Alito said that abortion policy crafted by elected representatives in the states would be more responsive to what constituents want than federal protection of the right. He was wrong.
Barbara Kruger’s ‘Untitled (Your body is a battleground)’ has seamlessly transitioned to social media, inspiring a new generation of media-savvy artists and activists.
Some reasons people oppose abortion seem to be at odds with other positions they hold. Evolutionary social science points to a surprising motivation for anti-abortion attitudes.
Historians of American religious history explain why the Supreme Court’s recent religious liberty rulings are an example of America’s long struggle to define religious freedom.
Abortion funds, which help people who cannot afford the procedure, are facing new kinds of pressures, including potential legal risks and a rising client demand that exceeds their capabilities.
The fundamental issue at stake in abortion debates is personhood, which is viewed differently around the world, an anthropologist writes.
Only 24 countries today totally ban abortion. The Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision in the US is unlikely to lead other countries to join that list.
The judicial theory has been a major talking point during the Supreme Court’s last term. But what does it actually mean?
Several rap songs speak on the subject of abortion from the perspective of the unborn child.
Some companies say they will cover travel expenses to help workers in states where abortion is illegal get the procedure, but doing so could pose legal challenges.
Tennessee and Wisconsin are among the states that can jail pregnant women because of illegal substance use, despite major medical groups saying that this practice isn’t effective.
The justices who decided to overturn the abortion rights precedent of Roe v. Wade explained their reasoning, and signaled other precedents could be reversed as well.
Even in states that ban abortion, legal precedents indicate that donating to, and receiving assistance from, abortion funds is an expression of free speech.
The Supreme Court held off at least another day before announcing a ruling on abortion rights. High profile cases take more time to finalize, but there are also political and public relations factors.
A scholar writes about how the Southern Baptist Convention’s views on abortion changed during the 1980s, when a more conservative wing seized control of the denomination.
There are 13 states with so-called ‘trigger laws’ that aim to ban abortion now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade. But what actually must happen for the laws to take effect?
The Supreme Court potentially overturning Roe v. Wade this spring will be only the first part of a complicated legal saga that will play out at the state level.
A Supreme Court scholar explains the significance of the recent Supreme Court leaked draft opinion.
In 1983, a constitutional referendum outlawed abortion in Ireland. In 2018, another referendum repealed the ban and legalized abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy. What happened?
Top contributors
-
Professor of Law, University of Virginia
-
Professor of Law, George Washington University
-
Postdoctoral Fellow, Harvard Kennedy School
-
Assistant Professor, Gettysburg College
-
Kalb Professor of Global Communications and Professor of Public Policy, Harvard Kennedy School
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, Oklahoma State University
-
Professor of Social Work, University of Tennessee
-
Associate Professor of Family Medicine and Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington
-
Professor of Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Oregon State University
-
Professor of Anthropology, Northwestern University
-
Researcher, University of California, San Francisco
-
Professor of Health Law and Professor of Law, Boston University
-
Professor of Law, University of Tennessee
-
Assistant Professor, Political Science, University of Windsor
-
Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Pennsylvania
