Bill C-372 does not curtail free speech and, if anything, demonstrates how banning fossil fuel ads does not go nearly far enough.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Fossil fuel lobbies
Displaying all articles
Does the science support the need for a fossil fuel phase out to reach 1.5 C? The answer depends on whether we believe that carbon capture and removal technologies can be deployed safely at scale.
Many oil and gas companies support a tax on carbon, even though they are significant emitters.
Researchers looked at a decade of political spending by the oil and gas industry and others engaged in climate policy. If money talks, one side had a giant megaphone.
The historic agreement on a loss and damage fund was overshadowed by lack of progress on phasing out fossil fuels.
Top contributors
-
Associate Professor, Australian National University
-
Doctorant en droit international public, coordinateur du Centre du droit de l'environnement et de la durabilité mondiale de l'Université d'Ottawa, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa
-
Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Victoria
-
Professeur en droit, Section de droit civil, Université d’Ottawa (Canada), membre du Conseil scientifique de la Fondation France Libertés, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa
-
Professor of Sociology, Brown University
-
Professeur au Département des sciences juridiques, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM)
-
Professor at Vancouver Island University & Postdoctoral fellow, Centre d’études en gouvernance et du Centre de droit de l’environnement et de la durabilité mondiale, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa
-
Postdoctoral research assistant, University of Oxford
-
PhD Student in Environmental Law, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa
-
PhD Candidate, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa
-
Assistant Professor, Economics, ESSEC
-
Professor and Climate Scientist, Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia University
