In two recent rulings, the conservative justices handed state lawmakers new power to redraw congressional maps to their liking – including in ways that end up diluting the Black vote.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Racial gerrymandering
Displaying all articles
The commission has tight deadlines to finalize new maps. 2 voting rights experts explain the messy situation.
A battle over the voting districts in Detroit has landed in the Supreme Court, but any ruling may come too late for 2024 state elections.
An upcoming Supreme Court case that turns on race and party could affect how state legislatures shape voting maps and how Americans vote for decades to come.
Two Supreme Court rulings on the use of race appear at odds with each other. Blame Chief Justice Roberts’s ambivalence on race, a constitutional law scholar writes.
It’s official: State courts can review lawmakers’ election-district boundary decisions to ensure they comply with state law.
At a time when state legislatures are enacting laws that restrict who, when and where people can vote, the US Supreme Court ruled to protect voting rights.
A ruling by the US Supreme Court to allow unlawful maps to be used in the midterm elections will affect who gets elected to the House of Representatives and may determine control of Congress.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Law, University of Richmond
-
Professor of Political Science, College of Charleston
-
Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science and Public Policy and Law, Trinity College
-
Professor of Critical Race and Ethnic Studies, Miami University
-
Professor of Political Science, Wayne State University
-
Professor of Political Science, Wayne State University
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, College of Charleston
-
Professor of Law, Wayne State University
