To know the real promise of psychedelic substances like LSD, mushrooms and MDMA, researchers must embrace the principles and practise of ‘open science.’
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Replicability
Displaying all articles
Studies in psychology cannot be replicated in the same way as in other fields. But technology could change that.
Bad research techniques have called into question the results of many psychology studies. Fixing the problem starts with making sure students don’t pick up bad habits.
We are observing two new phenomena. On one hand doubt is shed on the quality of entire scientific fields or sub-fields. On the other this doubt is played out in the open, in the media and blogosphere.
A team of archaeologists strived to improve the reproducibility of their results, influencing their choices in the field, in the lab and during data analysis.
Partly in response to the so-called ‘reproducibility crisis’ in science, researchers are embracing a set of practices that aim to make the whole endeavor more transparent, more reliable – and better.
A century-old case of scientific fraud illustrates how hard it is to untangle the truth when access to new discoveries is limited.
Embracing more rigorous scientific methods would mean getting science right more often than we currently do. But the way we value and reward scientists makes this a challenge.
Only 1% of published psychology research papers are ever repeated. If psychologists want their discipline to be taken seriously, they’ll need to get their house in order.
The field of psychology is trying to absorb a recent big study that was able to replicate only 36 out of 100 major research papers. That finding is an issue, but maybe not for the reason you think.
Researchers from around the globe tried to replicate 100 published psychology studies. They were successful on only 36.
In January, Haruko Obokata and colleagues published two papers in the journal Nature suggesting that a simple acid bath can convert differentiated cells back to a stem-cell-like state. This finding, if…
Bankers aim to maximise profits. Scientists aim to understand reality. But Mike Peacey of the University of Bristol suggests, based on a new model he has just published in Nature, that both professionals…
Top contributors
-
Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina
-
PhD Candidate, Congnitive Neuroscience, University of Toronto
-
Open Evidence Research, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, UOC - Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
-
Professor, University of Guelph
-
Professor of Sociology, University of Nottingham
-
Assistant Professor of Psychology, Grand Valley State University
-
Reader of Clinical Psychology, University of Manchester
-
Associate Professor of Archaeology, University of Washington
-
Lecturer in Clinical Psychology, University of Sheffield
-
Professor of History, UMass Amherst
-
Professor of Cognitive Neuropsychology, University of Hertfordshire
-
PhD student, University of Bristol
-
Professor of Social Science, Cardiff University
-
Associate Professor, University of Guelph
-
Postdoctoral Fellow at the School of Management, Yale University
