An elaborate scheme to shade Earth with millions of tonnes of Moon dust floating in space is unlikely to get off the ground.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Solar geoengineering
Displaying all articles
Injecting reflective particles into the atmosphere won’t immediately cool the entire planet. A new study shows how parts of the US, China and Europe might still see temperatures rising a decade later.
Here are two possible forms of regional geoengineering.
Solar geoengineering could temporarily address the worst impacts of global warming.
The risks of using aerosols to reflect sunlight and cool the planet include creating extreme weather and worsening catastrophes.
An engineered climate recovery needs to be taken seriously — in addition to cutting emissions.
Solar geoengineering could theoretically cool the Earth to slow global warming, and it has been controversial. Still, countries should research its risks and benefits.
Is it time to take drastic steps to modify Earth’s climate to avoid catastrophic warming? A panel of experts says the idea deserves study.
Artificially dimming the sun, by injecting reflective particles into the upper atmosphere, could reduce the risk of Day Zero level droughts in Cape Town by more than 90% in the future.
A disaster fantasy raises questions about tinkering with Earth’s climate. With real-life scientists exploring geoengineering, what conversations should we be having now around these technologies?
The prospect of attempting to engineer the world’s climate has become a lot more real since the Paris Agreement.
It’s increasingly likely that at some point, the world’s nations will need to broach the fraught discussion of geoengineering. The UN climate accord was a natural forum to do it.
Yes, we blunt the effects of climate change by getting off fossil fuels. But countries’ most ambitious targets imply use of climate engineering schemes – and that discussion should be done in public.
Blocking the sun by injecting tiny particles in the atmosphere – called solar geoengineering – can lower the Earth’s temperature but has some real costs. Economists run the numbers.
Top contributors
-
Director, Centre for Climate Repair, University of Cambridge
-
Professor and Scott Presidential Chair in Environmental Science and Engineering, Colorado State University
-
PhD Scholar in Climate Governance, Australian National University
-
Postdoctoral Research Associate in Existential Risk, University of Cambridge
-
Professor of Advanced Technology Transitions, Arizona State University
-
Kirkland & Ellis Professor of Law, Northwestern University
-
Managing Director, Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment, American University School of International Service
-
Assistant Professor and Director of the Global Environmental Politics program in the School of International Service, American University School of International Service
-
Director, African Climate and Development Initiative, University of Cape Town
-
Associate Professor of Economics, Georgia State University
-
Professor of Engineering Dynamics and Vibration, University of Cambridge
-
Founding Head, School of Public Policy, and Vipula and Mahesh Chaturevdi Professor of Policy Studies, The Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
-
Senior Research Fellow in Climate Change Risks, University of Cape Town
-
Presidential Fellow in Environment, University of Manchester
-
Ph.D. Candidate, Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley
