Our study shows the way bank bosses talk about risk can negatively affect financial stability.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on SVB
Displaying all articles
Financial crises are inevitably followed by legislation to restructure the banking system, and the ongoing problems with bank stability are likely to be no exception.
The failure of Silicon Valley Bank has exposed gaps in financial regulation that could be tricky to fill.
The Fed raised rates by a quarter-point – less aggressive than had been expected before the current banking crisis, but signaling inflation is still its focus.
There are two types of systemic risk that can infect the highly interconnected global banking system.
The chances of any bank in Australia or New Zealand following the trajectory of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse is effectively zero.
Companies benefit from certain internal environmental and social checks and balances, particularly when it comes to preventing a tumble in their share price.
The banking crisis has been caused by the interest rate rises, and further hikes were supposed to be a no no.
Top contributors
-
Lecturer in Economics and Finance, University of Huddersfield
-
Professor of Banking and Finance, Brunel University London
-
Senior Lecturer in Economics, University of Huddersfield
-
Professor of Economics, Skidmore College
-
Senior Teaching Fellow in Economics, Lancaster University
-
Director, Latin American Business Environment program, University of Florida
-
Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra
-
Professor of Economics, University of Nottingham
-
Associate Professor of Economics, Skidmore College
-
Associate Professor of Finance, University of Nebraska Omaha
-
Associate Professor of Economics, West Virginia University
-
Lecturer in Financial Services, Edinburgh Napier University
-
Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) in Accounting, Newcastle University
