Courtroom drama is drawing attention to a broader subject: Donald Trump’s approach to the media.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Trump indictments
Displaying all articles
A Georgia election law scholar explains what’s behind the ruling and what it means for the state’s prosecution of Trump.
Trump-aligned political action committees have paid lawyers for the former president tens of millions of dollars. Are there any limits on how much, or on what, they can spend?
Despite what January polls suggest, in a Donald Trump vs. Joe Biden rematch in November, a result similar to 2020 would be probable: a big Biden vote lead and tight state-by-state battles.
The former president has raised several legal arguments that do not yet have clear answers. A constitutional scholar says they’re questions worth asking.
The Constitution makes clear that a president who was impeached and convicted can still be prosecuted − but what about one who is acquitted in two impeachment trials?
Trump’s call for violence is only part of a larger push for social disruption and destruction. For only in the wake of such events can a new, white, Christian, illiberal world arise.
With co-defendants of Donald Trump accepting plea bargains, an expert in criminal law explains what these legal agreements are and how they work.
Trump’s lawyers, and those prosecuting him, aren’t the only ones grappling with the problem of finding unbiased jurors in the age of social media.
Trump has not been silenced. The limits on his speech protect fundamental rights − including his right to a fair trial by an unbiased jury and the public’s right to a working justice system.
From immigration and federal spending to Ukraine and the state of American schools, eight GOP presidential candidates had a lot to say.
Department of Justice prosecutors could have composed a technocratic document intelligible only to other criminal law insiders when indicting Donald Trump in the documents case. They did much more.
Trump has trial dates set for three of his four criminal cases. But generally, state and federal prosecutors will coordinate to make sure that their dates don’t overlap.
What can President Trump and his lawyers say about documents and witness statements used as evidence in his upcoming trial over his alleged attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election?
Donald Trump’s trial for his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election will promote accountability – but could this show trial have a dangerous outcome, too?
New findings by political scientists at Northwestern University and Harvard Kennedy School provide a clearer picture of which demographic groups support Trump.
While Trump has received early warnings ahead of indictments and detailed explanations behind the charges, criminal defendants typically get a bare-bones explanation.
Donald Trump’s legal woes will nourish and strengthen his rhetorical style, and his followers will continue to be persuaded by how he makes them feel, not by reason, facts or critical thought.
Top contributors
-
Foundation Professor of Law and Political Science, Arizona State University
-
Professor, Department of Communication Arts, University of Waterloo
-
Associate Professor of Law, University of Alabama
-
Professor of Law, Boston University
-
Ph.D. Candidate in Political Science, Northwestern University
-
Kalb Professor of Global Communications and Professor of Public Policy, Harvard Kennedy School
-
Co-Director, National Security and Civil Rights Program, Loyola University Chicago
-
Distinguished Practitioner in Residence, Loyola University Chicago
-
Professor of Law, University of Virginia
-
Teaching Professor of Law, University of Colorado Boulder
-
Professor of Law and Harold Norris Faculty Scholar, Michigan State University
-
Provost Associate Professor, American University School of International Service
-
Professor of History, Arizona State University
-
Professor Emeritus of Communication and Rhetorical Studies, Syracuse University
-
Professor of Law, University of Dayton
