Sections

Services

Information

UK United Kingdom

Facebook’s so uncool, but it’s morphing into a different beast

What does 2014 hold for your online life? If you’re young, it probably won’t involve Facebook that much. This year marked the start of what looks likely to be a sustained decline of what had been the most…

Age: 16, likes: social networking, dislikes: Facebook. dangaken

What does 2014 hold for your online life? If you’re young, it probably won’t involve Facebook that much.

This year marked the start of what looks likely to be a sustained decline of what had been the most pervasive of all social networking sites. Young people are turning away in their droves and adopting other social networks instead, while the worst people of all, their parents, continue to use the service.

As part of a European Union-funded study on social media, we are running nine simultaneous 15-month ethnographic studies in eight countries. What we’ve learned from working with 16-18 year olds in the UK is that Facebook is not just on the slide, it is basically dead and buried. Mostly they feel embarrassed even to be associated with it. Where once parents worried about their children joining Facebook, the children now say it is their family that insists they stay there to post about their lives. Parents have worked out how to use the site and see it as a way for the family to remain connected. In response, the young are moving on to cooler things.

Instead, four new contenders for the crown have emerged: Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat and WhatsApp. This teaches us a number of important lessons about winning the app war.

Slick isn’t always best

It’s worth noting that the sites and apps that have stolen the hearts of Facebook exiles are no match for it in terms of functionality. Most of the school children in our survey recognised that in many ways, Facebook is technically better than Twitter or Instagram. It is more integrated, better for photo albums, organising parties and more effective for observing people’s relationships.

None of these four have the range of integrated functions found on Facebook. WhatsApp is better for messaging and is now said to have overtaken Facebook as the number one way to send mobile messages. But it doesn’t begin to compare as an overall social network site. Neither can the others. This suggests that the dynamics of new media may depend on factors other than function.

Who’s watching you? Who cares?

Many in journalism and elsewhere wanted Facebook to fall. As Facebook became a behemoth, it started to be seen by some as an evil data corporation that represented global neo-liberal capitalism. The company has long been accused of hoovering up your user data and giving advertisers access to it. This year, concern over this type of activity reached an all time high, when it became clear that the NSA was accessing Facebook information. But young people havn’t gone to the expected alternatives. A lot of them have turned to Snapchat, a picture-sharing service that allows you to send pictures that disappear seconds after they have been sent.

While users are migrating from Facebook, they don’t appear to be doing it to make a statement about mass surveillance or big corporations. One of the most popular alternatives is Instagram, a site which allows you to upload and share photos. And who owns this site? Facebook, of course. Among our UK subjects, there was no evidence that these issues affected their choice of social networking service.

My mum wants to friend me

What appears to be the most seminal moment in a young person’s decision to leave Facebook was surely that dreaded day your mum sends you a friend request. You just can’t be young and free if you know your parents can access your every indiscretion. The desire for the new, also drives each new generation to find their own media and this is playing out now in social media. It is nothing new that young people care about style and status in relation to their peers, and Facebook is simply not cool anymore.

For anthropologists each media is best defined in relation to the others, what we call polymedia. So Facebook may look the same in 2014, but it has changed by virtue of this new competition. In my school research, the closest friends are connected to each other via Snapchat, WhatsApp is used to communicate with quite close friends and Twitter the wider friends. Instagram can include strangers and is used a little differently.

Facebook, on the other hand, has become the link with older family, or even older siblings who have gone to university. To prevent overgrazing as others beasts have occupied its terrain, Facebook has to feed off somewhere else. It has thereby evolved into a very different animal.

Sign in to Favourite

Join the conversation

14 Comments sorted by

  1. F.B. Purity

    logged in via Twitter

    I believe that another factor causing people to abandon facebook in their droves is the fact Facebook are ramping up the number of ads they are showing to their users to a ridiculous level, its the boiling frog theory gone wrong.

    They are turning up the heat slowly, so as not to scare off their users, but its now reaching boiling point, and the frogs are actually deciding to jump out rather than stay in and be boiled alive.

    Their latest plan is to introduce autoplaying Video Ads, which nobody…

    Read more
  2. Ian Graham

    logged in via Twitter

    The claim that young people are becoming sophisticated users of multiple social networks is plausible, but the claim that Facebook is "dead and buried" isn't even supported by the rest of the article. The final paragraph implies that the growth of other social messaging platforms has been at the expense of Facebook, but Facebook and the rest have all been trying to displace SMS amongst users of all ages as feature and smart phones have taken off. Rather than morphing into something new, the less interesting insight is that Facebook started out as a social network platform that has failed to morph into a dominant messaging platform.

    report
  3. Jason Smith

    logged in via Facebook

    "Facebook is not just on the slide, it is basically dead and buried..."

    That doesn't seem hyperbolic, as you've qualified the statement by saying it's not just declining.

    So the study thus far in the UK proves that teens generally no longer log in and post to Facebook, or view their news feeds?

    report
  4. Harry Hawk

    logged in via Facebook

    A very interesting article Prof. Miller. Is there any formal research that has been published or any of your anonymized but otherwise raw data?

    There many factors here. The 1st is that those under 13 are not allowed to use Facebook (TOS). Second, anyone in their late teens (or earlier) is told to effectively shield their life from Facebook/Twitter, Etc. at the risk of ruining their lives by allowing indiscretions of their younger selves to be "permanently" recorded on on "The Internet."

    Finally, there are examples of products which have great appeal to younger individuals who then distance themselves in their teenage years, only to embrace these products later as adults.

    Harry Hawk
    Adj. Instructor in HMGT
    NYCCT

    report
  5. Tyler Shuster

    logged in via Facebook

    "Parents have worked out how to use the site and see it as a way for the family to remain connected. In response, the young are moving on to cooler things."

    I don't think this is necessarily true. I agree with your conclusion: the young are moving on. But I don't think that parents have actively worked out how to use the site. Rather, Facebook has adapted to fit an older userbase. Every time the site goes through a redesign, there are two vocal groups: the people who are upset about the change…

    Read more
  6. Naomi Radunski

    Writer

    It doesn't seem logical to be comparing Facebook to Whatsapp, for example.
    Not only does Facebook appeal to a different demographic, it now serves a different function.
    Whatsapp - free texting, really - has enormous appeal to a kid.
    For adults, Facebook is not about that ... its meaning has become far more textured and nuanced than anyone might have imagined even three years ago, that depth can't be tweeted or whats'd.

    report
  7. Jess Robinson

    Programmer

    I read this, then I thought aobut how I use facebook.. And its mostly for none of the things mentioned. I don't put pictures on it, I only use it for messages for those who don't use other tools I use (which are only a few, family members, heh), and I use Twitter for the Twitter thing.

    What I do use it for is something I'm not sure how to name, groupings of people with similar interests who can share info/updates etc. A bit like IRC (although I still use that for some groups) or Google groups (ditto), but for the less tech savvy. I also use it for events/invitations etc.

    Do young people not use/need these things at all, or are they covered by one of the mentioned tools in a way I've not noticed at all?

    report
  8. Comment removed by moderator.

  9. Comment removed by moderator.

  10. Eng Tarek Hammam

    logged in via Facebook

    افضل شركات نقل الأثاث بالرياض+
    شركة كشف تسربات المياه+
    شركة عزل+
    تخزين اثاث بالرياض+
    شركة نقل عفش بالرياض+
    شركة ترميمات عامة بالرياض+
    شركة تشطيبات بالرياض+
    شركة مكافحة حشرات بجدة+
    شركة نقل اثاث بمكة+
    شركة تنظيف بمكة+
    شركات تنظيف منازل بجدة+
    شركة كشف تسربات بجدة+
    شركة مكافحة حشرات بجدة+
    شركة عزل خزانات بجدة+
    شركة نقل عفش بمكة+
    شركة عزل خزانات بجدة+
    شركات مكافحة حشرات بجدة+
    شركة تنظيف خزانات بجدة+
    شركات نقل عفش مكة+
    شركات تنظيف منازل مكة+
    شركات رش المبيدات حشرية مكة+
    شركة عزل …

    Read more
  11. Comment removed by moderator.

  12. Comment removed by moderator.

  13. Comment removed by moderator.

  14. Comment removed by moderator.