When ideological enemies talk across their great divides, something good can happen – it reduces stereotypes and inflammatory language directed at people who don’t agree on the abortion rights issue.
Disiplin ilmiah, gaya jurnalistik
Artikel-artikel mengenai US Supreme Court
Menampilkan 161 - 180 dari 675 artikel
The U.S. House of Representatives recently voted for a bill that would federally protect same-sex marriage – and 47 Republicans signed on, too. Same-sex marriage isn’t the partisan issue it once was.
Lower federal court judges follow a formal code of ethics, but this does not apply to Supreme Court justices, leaving potential conflicts of interest unchecked.
A doctrine embraced by some conservatives could be adopted by the US Supreme Court. And if the court does, Americans’ political power will be dramatically limited.
Unlike in most countries, US Supreme Court justices enjoy life tenure. Some legal scholars believe that centuries-old custom, meant to protect judicial independence, no longer serves the public.
For the past 50 years, the Supreme Court has issued rulings that narrow tribal rights while Congress has worked to expand them. A recent ruling struck yet another blow against Native sovereignty.
President Joe Biden has pledged sweeping action on climate change but struggled to deliver it. A legal scholar explains why a national emergency declaration should be a last resort.
Historians of American religious history explain why the Supreme Court’s recent religious liberty rulings are an example of America’s long struggle to define religious freedom.
Abortion funds, which help people who cannot afford the procedure, are facing new kinds of pressures, including potential legal risks and a rising client demand that exceeds their capabilities.
History shows that political contests over the ideological slant of the court are nothing new.
As many as 80% of young people want abortion to be legal, and most disagree with the Supreme Court’s recent Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. This could lead to high youth voting rates in the 2022 midterms.
Only 24 countries today totally ban abortion. The Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision in the US is unlikely to lead other countries to join that list.
Same-sex marriage and contraception rights could be under threat, if the same legal principle is used as in the recent abortion case.
The judicial theory has been a major talking point during the Supreme Court’s last term. But what does it actually mean?
By overturning Roe v. Wade, the US Supreme Court has thrown the issue of abortion back to the states – and made it harder for Black and brown women to have access to reproductive health services.
A review of S&P 500 companies finds carbon disclosure doesn’t necessarily mean emissions fall.
A scholar of 18th-century America and the founders analyzes the Supreme Court opinion overturning the constitutional right to abortion, which he says relies on an incomplete version of US history.
Decision-making in the Canadian Supreme Court appears to be more fundamentally rooted in the law, not politics, than it is in the United States. Here’s why.
The court’s history shows it is often at the centre of political arguments.
Unlike Australia, judicial appointments in the US are politicised. Democratic presidents will try to appoint left-wing judges and Republican presidents will try to appoint right-wing judges.
Kontributor teratas
-
Dean of Economics, Politics & History, The University of Austin
-
Joseph Panzer Chair in Education and Research Professor of Law, University of Dayton
-
Associate Professor of American History and Politics, University of East Anglia
-
Professor of Law and Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Wayne State University
-
William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science, Amherst College
-
Professor of Law, University of Richmond
-
Professor Emeritus of Law and Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Case Western Reserve University
-
Professor of Law, University of Virginia
-
Professor of Law, George Washington University
-
Professor of Law Emeritus, Vermont Law & Graduate School
-
Venable Professor of Law, University of Baltimore
-
Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science, UMass Amherst
-
Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Wayne State University
-
Foundation Professor of Law and Political Science, Arizona State University
-
Distinguished Fellow in Law and Government, Dickinson Law, Penn State
