Is it time for Congress to act?
As the issue of an open and free internet again comes up for public debate, Congress could participate – and help regulators devise a workable set of policies.
How fast is that video really coming in?
How do internet companies decide which network traffic to slow down and which to charge against users' data plans? And what can we learn about net neutrality from the answers?
Are we really headed for a two-speed internet?
There are other more pressing problems when it comes to internet regulation.
In an emergency, responders’ telecommunications could get delayed by overloaded networks.
City of Hampton, Virginia
A new data management system can give emergency responders a fast lane on the internet to help speed rescue efforts after a disaster.
Is America’s digital economy facing a stormy future?
The digital economy in the US is already on the verge of stalling; failing to protect an open internet would further erode the United States’ digital competitiveness.
Some Americans have fast internet, but many still lag behind – especially in rural areas.
BlueRingMedia via shutterstock.com
The Trump administration's proposed budget suggests it will continue to spend federal dollars on expanding broadband internet access. But the rules governing internet traffic matter too.
There’s still a lot of the U.S. waiting to be wired up.
President Trump has touted infrastructure investment as a way to boost the U.S. economy. At the moment, he's missing a key opportunity – expanding broadband internet service.
Speech bubbles via shutterstock.com
As the Trump administration settles into office, regulators and lawmakers have big plans for shifting the country's media landscape, with potentially profound effects on the public.
The US is set to rollback the rules that keep internet companies on a level playing-field. It could make services slower and more expensive.
Trump's FCC chairman Ajit Pai has proposed a major change in internet regulation, doing away with the Open Internet Order. Experts describe what's at stake, and why it matters.
The public must prepare to stand up for a free press, and against online censorship and surveillance.
Not all online traffic is the same; should we treat it the same anyway?
Scale via shutterstock.com
Not all internet traffic is the same. Despite the recent legal win for network neutrality, many questions remain.
The court ruling will keep all internet traffic treated equally.
Laptop with arrows via shutterstock.com
If you like binge-watching Netflix, streaming audio or online gaming, then you should be celebrating this week. And if your business depends on reaching a wide audience online, you should join in.
Supporters of net neutrality say it’s essential to keeping the Internet free and open.
Internet providers increasingly allow services to subsidize the cost of delivering their content to users. That may seem like a win for consumers, but game theory suggests otherwise.
India has hit ‘dislike’ on Facebook.
Image sourced from Shutterstock.com
The decision of an Indian regulator to make Facebook Free Basics illegal saw reason trump propaganda.
The net neutrality debate has sparked many protests in recent years, culminating in the FCC decision to make broadband a utility.
Net neutrality is supposed to keep internet providers from offering preferential treatment, but there's a loophole when the ISP owns the content.
Neutrality in style and substance.
The need for net neutrality regulations in the US speaks volumes about competition in the land of the free market.
Tim Harford got it wrong on net neutrality.
Short answer: it isn’t obvious that it can. Let me back up a second and explain why I am revisiting this issue. Tim Harford published an article a few days ago that took his masterful econsplaining skills…
The 3 to 2 FCC vote favored Chairman Tom Wheeler’s proposed net neutrality rules and will regulate broadband providers more heavily than in the past.
This open internet debate isn't the first time the government has wrestled with the question of how to apportion rights between private media owners and the public.
The FCC’s vote is unlikely to end the controversy over net neutrality.
The FCC proposal could prevent content discrimination but wouldn't solve the main problem: most rules governing the web are 80 years old.