There’s more to it than political beliefs.
Buttons image via www.shutterstock.com.
Social scientists investigate when and why liberals and conservatives mistrust science. The apparent split may be more about cultural and personal beliefs than feelings about science itself.
Coining a phrase. Muslim philosopher al-Fabri depicted on Kazakh currency.
Abu Nasr al-Farabi can teach us about the thinking behind radicalisation, and offers a warning to terrorists guilty of 'over-belief'.
Guns collected for the LA County annual Gun Melt.
People with different views on guns don't just see guns differently, they see the world differently.
Can new ideas break through preconceived notions?
Light bulb image via www.shutterstock.com.
The very goal of science, to discover the new and unknown, is hampered by any outdated personal beliefs scientists hold.
Sorry for being so naughty.
While children from religious households may seem less generous according to one piece of research, seen in another light these traits may be a good thing.
People in the West seem to have a bleak vision of the prospects for our way of life and even for the survival of humanity.
People rate the risks of global threats to humanity surprisingly high. We need to understand the impacts of a loss of faith in notions of material progress and scientific and technological fixes.
Religion can be a force for peace, the goal of these Australian religious leaders, or conflict – the believer and not the religion itself bears the responsibility.
There are religious and non-religious extremists and we should not confuse violent believers with religion itself, which has a long history of peacemaking.
‘Naive’ theories of what does and doesn’t make sense.
Gravity by Shutterstock
Naive theories of all kinds persist in the face of contradictory arguments and even in those who know them to be false.
Is religion a relic of the past?
All sorts of claims about religious decline are flying around at the moment, from George Carey’s comment that the Church of England is “one generation away from extinction” to Richard Dawkins’ comments…