The Paris agreement has given us some solid targets to aim for in terms of limiting global warming. But that in turn begs a whole range of new scientific questions.
Is the sun setting on coal investments?
EPA/Federico Gambarini/AAP
Energy companies are realising that, in light of the Paris climate deal, the economics are starting to line up in favour of climate action, not against it.
Really deep cuts in aircraft emissions are still a distant prospect.
Joakim Lloyd Raboff/Shutterstock.com
Governments and the aviation industry have welcomed new proposed aircraft emissions standards - which rather suggests that the new rules don’t go far enough.
Countries such as Mauritania have contributed little to climate change, yet face the worst impacts such as crop failure.
Oxfam International/Flickr
Australia’s greenhouse emissions are once again rising, after a decade of consistent declines. But the right policies are already in place to turn things around - they just need to be ramped up.
It’s a tall order - especially when it’s spelled out on the Eiffel Tower.
Reuters/Charles Platiau
How will the world actually deliver on the Paris climate ambition to hold global warming to no more than 1.5°C? It’s a tough scientific and technical challenge.
Laurent Fabius has brought the gavel down on a successful deal.
Reuters/Stephane Mahe
The Paris climate summit yielded a pact to reduce air pollutants that contribute to global warming but missed a chance to address the interlinked effects of agriculture and climate.
Leaders celebrate the adoption of the Paris Agreement on Saturday.
Stephane Mahe/Reuters
Australia’s new cap on emissions includes aspects of a “baseline and credit” emissions trading scheme. That’s cheaper for businesses, but means more regulation.