In a world of increasingly convincing AI-generated text, photos and videos, it’s more important than ever to be able to distinguish authentic media from fakes and imitations. The challenge is how.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on ChatGPT
Displaying 121 - 140 of 169 articles
AI chatbots are on the rise in China – but their abilities and purpose may be quite different from the products of US tech giants.
AI tools are now generating content that’s difficult to distinguish from reality.
When OpenAI claims to be “developing technologies that empower everyone,” who is included in the term “everyone?” And in what context will this “power” be wielded?
If people rely on ChatGPT or Google for complex medical questions, they could come unstuck.
The latest release in the GPT series shows marked improvement over predecessors.
Searching the web with ChatGPT is like talking to an expert – if you’re OK getting a mix of fact and fiction. But even if it were error-free, searching this way comes with hidden costs.
Our tendency to view machines as people and become attached to them points to real risks of psychological entanglement with AI technology.
The AI is not a major threat to human employment.
Students could learn about critical thinking, writing and the broader role of artificial intelligence tools like chatbots.
AI chatbots can’t take responsibility for what they say, so we shouldn’t trust them.
It is one thing to treat AI as a tool when it has no scope for emotion. It is quite another when AI has a full suite of emotional responses.
Rather than seeing artificial intelligence as the cause of new problems, we might better understand AI ethics as bringing attention to old ones.
New technologies are often surrounded by hopeful messages that they will alleviate poverty and bring about positive social change. History shows these assumptions are often misplaced.
The irruption of ChatPT has had impact everywhere, including higher education. But can it be a greater impact than expected?
Journalists, policymakers and academics are among those whose worlds could be turned upside down by AI chatbots.
We ought to want student essays to reflect understanding, judgment and caring, something beyond ChatGPT.
Some fear ChatGPT will increase student cheating. But education academics say it can also save time preparing lessons and create new opportunities for learning.
Educators need to carefully consider ChatGPT and issues of academic integrity to move toward an assessment system that leverages AI tools.
Users are having a blast getting creative with AI generators – but your output is only ever as good as your prompt.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Community Information, University of Michigan
-
Professor of Information Systems, Michigan State University
-
Lecturer in Business Analytics, University of Sydney
-
Professor of Philosophy and Director, Applied Ethics Center, UMass Boston
-
Associate Professor of Computer Science, Affiliate Professor of Information Science, University of Colorado Boulder
-
Professor of AI, Research Group Leader, UNSW Sydney
-
Pro Vice-Chancellor, Educational Innovation, University of Sydney
-
Postdoctoral Fellow in Philosophy, UMass Boston
-
Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra
-
Associate Professor, Department of Learning and Teaching Enhancement, Edinburgh Napier University
-
Professor of Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley
-
Associate Vice Chancellor, University of Tennessee
-
Associate Professor of Computer Science, Florida International University
-
Professor of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
-
Associate Professor, University of Sydney
