The next prime minister has an opportunity to make abortion rights more or less secure in UK law.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on European Convention on Human Rights
Displaying 1 - 20 of 31 articles
The court blocked the UK from deporting asylum-seekers to Rwanda until after cases in the UK are decided.
The proposals for a new bill of rights are now out for consultation.
‘Show trials’ by dictatorships have repeatedly been shown to have no basis in law.
From wearables with monitoring chips to face scanners that assess your contentment, workplace surveillance seems to be going in one direction.
If the Semenya ruling by the Court for Arbitration in Sport remains unchallenged, this way of thinking and behaving might filter into the International Olympic Committee
Soldier amnesty plans pose grave challenges to human rights – and set the stage for a future showdown with the European Court of Human Rights.
Mistaken links between the EU and the European Convention on Human Rights could be one factor that sees the UK losing out on these vital supranational laws.
Despite its controversial nature, new research into the not proven verdict shows it helps juries ascribe guilt more adequately.
Despite its reputation, Russia has contributed much more to international law than it’s sometimes given credit for.
… and why their treatment angered human rights campaigners at the time.
The Conservative party manifesto’s repudiation of the ‘libertarian right’ bodes ill for the European Court of Human Rights.
A Norwegian appeal court has ruled that the mass murderer’s human rights are not being violated by the conditions of his imprisonment.
Three key rulings by the UK Supreme Court and their legal implications.
The European Court of Human Rights will consider whether Breivik’s human rights have been violated by his solitary detention.
The UK government plans to suspend parts of the European Convention on Human Rights in future conflicts.
Nicola Sturgeon’s ‘named person’ plan for supporting children is a good idea with a major flaw.
It is no threat to UK sovereignty and protects vulnerable citizens – so why replace the Human Rights Act?
The home secretary is campaigning against Brexit, but with a caveat.
The Conservatives have got it half-right by seeking to repeal the Human Rights Act. Too bad they want to replace it with something almost as unhelpful.
Top contributors
-
Senior Lecturer in Law, researcher in international law, Birkbeck, University of London
-
Professor Emeritus of Applied Philosophy, Glasgow Caledonian University
-
Professor, Lancaster Law School, Lancaster University
-
Lecturer in International Human Rights Law at Essex Law School, University of Essex
-
Professor of Criminology, Birmingham City University
-
Lecturer in history, University of Sydney
-
Reader in International Law and Human Rights, University of Liverpool
-
Professor of Law, Durham University
-
Reader in Public International Law, University of Surrey
-
Associate Professor of Politics, Richmond American International University
-
Reader in Constitutional Law and Human Rights, University of Birmingham
-
Professor of Law and Anthropology, University of Brighton
-
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dr Williams's Library, University of Stirling
-
Professor of International Human Rights Law, Queen Mary University of London
-
Professor of Law, University of Essex
