It's all about being 'sufficiently distinctive' and in the multi-billion dollar chocolate business, much is at stake.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on European Court of Justice
Displaying 1 - 20 of 24 articles
Genetic modification rules now cover gene edited crops but exclude plants bred traditionally with the same properties.
The UK government has consistently pledged freedom from European laws. It's clear now that the plan is no such thing.
There is historical precedent for suing the EU. But is it a good idea?
It sparked a series of government resignations, but what's actually in Theresa May's Brexit plan?
The European Court of Justice has ruled that EU member states must recognise same-sex marriages concluded elsewhere in the EU, even if they don't allow same-sex marriage.
The prime minister conceded that the UK must continue to abide by European Court of Justice rulings, even after Brexit.
What the EU and UK agree and disagree on when it comes to the transition period after Brexit.
The UK government seems to be accepting some role for the court after leaving the European Union.
It's likely that a future UK-EU trade deal will be subject to approval by all EU member states and their sub-national parliaments.
If you have an Irish granny, a spare €650,000 to spend in Malta, or a hankering for a new villa in Cyprus, then EU citizenship is within reach.
The British government is actually suggesting quite a radical change as part of leaving the EU, but it doesn't want to make it too easy to understand.
After Brexit, Theresa May says the UK will 'take back control of our laws'.
UK companies currently trade in the EU knowing that legal disputes will be enforced in any member state. Brexit risks changing all that.
Free movement will be at the heart of post-Brexit negotiations. But what is it?
The ruling signals part of a wider trend restricting access to welfare for EU migrants.
Without European laws and courts to strike down overreaching UK legislation, post-Brexit Britons may see more invasions of their privacy.
We asked two academics to check the claim by Michael Gove that the EU court has been grabbing power.
Two academics examine the claim by Michael Gove that the deal between the UK and the EU is not legally binding.
Why the rush to replace the Safe Harbour datasharing agreement with something just as leaky? It smacks of placing transatlantic trade over European privacy.
Top contributors
-
Principal Lecturer, College of Business Law & Social Sciences, Nottingham Law School, Nottingham Trent University
-
Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Westminster
-
Jean Monnet Professor of European Union Law, University of Sheffield
-
Professor of Cybersecurity, School of Computer Science and Informatics, De Montfort University
-
Lecturer in Law, researcher in international law, Birkbeck, University of London
-
Professor, Strathclyde University
-
Professor of Law, University of Essex
-
Senior Lecturer in International Relations, University of Bath
-
Postdoctoral research fellow, City, University of London
-
Director of the Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge
-
Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Immigration Politics and Policy, University of Sussex
-
Reader in Politics, Royal Holloway
-
Senior Lecturer, University of Bath
-
Associate Professor of Law & Fellow of Mansfield College, University of Oxford
-
Associate Professor of Law, Georgia State University
